Skip to main content
Log in

Domino connector for thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy reduction: surgical technique and patient series

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Different techniques have been previously described to close the pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) site for correction of sagittal malalignment; the use of a side-to-side domino connector as a correction tool in the thoracic spine has not been specifically studied.

Methods

Twenty adult patients who underwent single-level thoracic PSO from T1 to T12 were included and retrospectively reviewed (two centers). Preoperative and postoperative full-body X-rays, perioperative data, clinical data and complications were recorded with a minimum 2 years of follow-up. Surgical technique and the nuances in using the domino connector were described in detail.

Results

Patients had a mean age of 40y; 40% were female. Two different techniques involving the domino were applied for closure of the PSO site depending on the type of kyphosis (smooth vs. angular deformity). Both techniques provided significant correction of the local kyphosis (from 48° to 18°) with reciprocal reduction of compensatory cervical lordosis (from 37.6° to 18.6°, p < 0.01) in upper thoracic PSO or lumbar lordosis (from 74.5° to 46.6°, p < 0.01) in lower thoracic PSO. Four patients presented postoperative complications that resolved (hemothorax, GI bleeding), and two patients presented transient neurological deficit. Oswestry Disability Index score improved in the majority of the patients (from 32.7 to 22.5, p < 0.05). There were no pseudarthroses, symptomatic instrumentation breakage, or surgical site infection.

Conclusion

Use of a side-to-side domino connector in combination with two different rod cantilever techniques is effective for the reduction of thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy achieving satisfactory radiological and clinical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K (2003) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:454–463. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200303000-00009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lau D, Haddad AF, Fury MT, Deviren V, Ames CP (2021) Multilevel pedicle subtraction osteotomy for correction of severe rigid adult spinal deformities: a case series, indications, considerations, and literature review. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 20:343–354. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opaa419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomasen E (1985) Vertebral osteotomy for correction of kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 194:142–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bullmann V, Halm HF, Schulte T, Lerner T, Weber TP, Liljenqvist UR (2006) Combined anterior and posterior instrumentation in severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 15:440–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-1016-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Sharkawi MM, Koptan WM, El-Miligui YH, Said GZ (2011) Comparison between pedicle subtraction osteotomy and anterior corpectomy and plating for correcting post-traumatic kyphosis: a multicenter study. Eur Spine J 20:1434–1440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1720-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Faciszewski T, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Johnson L (1995) The surgical and medical perioperative complications of anterior spinal fusion surgery in the thoracic and lumbar spine in adults. A review of 1223 procedures. Spine 20:1592–1599. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199507150-00007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiffolot X, Lemaire JP, Bogorin I, Steib JP (2006) Pedicle closing-wedge osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0035-1040(06)75733-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Girod PP, Kogl N, Molliqaj G, Lener S, Hartmann S, Thome C (2021) Flexing a standard hinge-powered operating table for lumbosacral three-column osteotomy (3-CO) site closure in 84 consecutive patients. Neurosurg Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01559-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta S, Gupta MC (2018) The Nuances of pedicle subtraction osteotomies. Neurosurg Clin N Am 29:355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2018.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bakaloudis G, Lolli F, Di Silvestre M, Greggi T, Astolfi S, Martikos K, Vommaro F, Barbanti-Brodano G, Cioni A, Giacomini S (2011) Thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the treatment of severe pediatric deformities. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 1):S95-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1749-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cesare F, Francesca B, Giovanni V, Marco M, Giuseppe G, Alberto R (2022) Multilevel non-contiguous thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed rounded hyperkyphotic deformity of the thoraco-lumbar junction with anterior bony fusion: technical note. J Orthop Traumatol 23:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-022-00665-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bourghli A, Boissiere L, Konbaz F, Al Eissa S, Al-Habib A, Qian BP, Qiu Y, Hayashi K, Pizones J, Ames C, Vital JM, Obeid I (2021) On the pedicle subtraction osteotomy technique and its modifications during the past two decades: a complementary classification to the Schwab’s spinal osteotomy classification. Spine Deform 9:515–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00247-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Obeid I, Hauger O, Aunoble S, Bourghli A, Pellet N, Vital JM (2011) Global analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in major deformities: correlation between lack of lumbar lordosis and flexion of the knee. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):681–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1936-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec JC (2011) Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 5):626–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1930-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hyun SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YC, Koester LA, Blanke KM (2015) Long-term radiographic outcomes of a central hook-rod construct for osteotomy closure: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 40:E428-432. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Faundez A, Le Huec JC, Hansen LV, Poh Ling F, Gehrchen M (2019) Optimizing pedicle subtraction osteotomy techniques: a new reduction plier to increase technical safety and angular reduction efficiency. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 16:383–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opy086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang BP, Ondra SL, Chen LA, Jung HS, Koski TR, Salehi SA (2006) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of thoracic and lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance. J Neurosurg Spine 5:9–17. https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2006.5.1.9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bourghli A, Boissiere L, Cawley D, Larrieu D, Pizones J, Alanay A, PelIise F, Kleinstuck F, Obeid I, European Spine Study G (2022) Domino connector is an efficient tool to improve lumbar lordosis correction angle after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for adult spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 31:2408–2414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07322-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Shaughnessy BA, Kuklo TR, Hsieh PC, Yang BP, Koski TR, Ondra SL (2009) Thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal spinal deformity. Spine 34:2893–2899. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c40bf2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cacho-Rodrigues P, Campana M, Obeid I, Vital JM, Gille O (2016) Sagittal correction and reciprocal changes after thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine 41:E791–E797. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Blondel B, Schwab F, Hostin R, Hart R, O’Shaughnessy B, Bess S, Hu SS, Deviren V, Ames CP, International Spine Study G (2012) Spontaneous improvement of cervical alignment after correction of global sagittal balance following pedicle subtraction osteotomy. J Neurosurg Spine 17:300–307. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.6.SPINE1250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lamartina C, Berjano P (2014) Classification of sagittal imbalance based on spinal alignment and compensatory mechanisms. Eur Spine J 23:1177–1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3227-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bourghli A, Abduljawad SM, Boissiere L, Obeid I (2020) Thoracolumbar kyphoscoliotic deformity with neurological impairment secondary to a butterfly vertebra in an adult. Spine Deform 8:819–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00050-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anouar Bourghli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest for this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bourghli, A., Boissiere, L., Konbaz, F. et al. Domino connector for thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy reduction: surgical technique and patient series. Eur Spine J 32, 1800–1809 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07650-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07650-3

Keywords

Navigation