Skip to main content
Log in

The anatomic study of clival screw fixation for the craniovertebral region

  • Chinese section
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study the anatomic parameters related to clival screw and establish reference data concerning the craniovertebral fixation technique.

Methods

Morphometric measurement of the clivus and the surrounding anatomic structures were obtained on 41 dry bone specimens. Then, 2-D CT reconstruction of the craniovertebral region of 30 patients (19 men and 11 women, ranging in age from 20–64 years with an average age of 38.8 years) were performed to measure the safety range for a 3.5-mm screw placement. Nine entry points were evaluated. Finally, one male fresh cadaver specimen (age 46 years) was dissected to observe the craniovertebral region.

Results

The clivus faces the basilar artery, the V ~ XII cranial nerves, the pons, and ventral medulla oblongata at its intracranial surface. The longitudinal diameter of extracranial clivus was 25.87 ± 2.64 mm. The narrowest diameter of the clivus was 12.84 ± 1.08 mm, the distance between the left and right hypoglossal canal was 32.70 ± 2.09 mm at its widest part. The distance between the left and right structures, the maximum value was 49.31 ± 4.16 mm at carotid canal, the minimum value was 16.54 ± 2.04 mm at the occipital condyle. The measurement of clival screws placement simulation via 2-D CT reconstruction images shows the maximum upper insertion angle of three components the optimal entry points, the candidate points, the limit entry points was 130.19°, 125.23° and 85.72°, and the total mean screw length was 7.57, 10.13 and 15.6 mm at the vertical entry angle, respectively.

Conclusions

Clival screw placement is a viable option for craniovertebral fixation. There is a safe scope for the screw length and angle of the screw placement. And, these parameters obtained in the present study will be helpful for anyone contemplating the use of clival screw fixation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee SC, Chen JF, Lee ST (2004) Complications of fixation to the occiput-anatomical and design implications. Br J Neurosurg 18:590–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lopez-Barea F, Rodriguez-Peralto JL, Hernandez-Moneo JL et al (1994) Tumors of the atlas. 3 incidental cases of osteochondroma, benign osteoblastoma, and atypical Ewing’s sarcoma. Clin Orthop 307:182–185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hart RA, Boriani S, Biaqini R et al (1997) A system for surgical staging and management of spinal tumors. A clinical outcome study of giant cell tumors of the spine. Spine 22:1773–1782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Porchet F, Sonntag VK, Vrodos N (1998) Cervical amyloidoma of C2. Case report and review of the literature. Spine 23:133–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harms J, Schmelzle R, Stoltze D (1987) Osteosynthesen im occipitocervicalen Übergang vom transoralen Zugang aus. In: XVII SICOT World Congress (eds) Abstract Book. Demeter Verlag, Munich, pp 32–33

  6. Kanzdiora F, Pflugmacher R, Ludwig K et al (2002) Biomechanical comparison of four anterior atlantoaxial plate systems. J Neurosurg 96:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yin QS, Ai FZ, Xia H et al (2004) Design and biomechanical evaluation of transoralpharyngeal atlantoaxial reduction plate. Chin J Exp Surg 21:65–67

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suchomel P, Buchvald P, Barsa P et al (2007) Single-stage total C-2 intralesional spondylectomy for chordoma with three-column reconstruction. J Neurosurg Spine 6:611–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rawlins JM, Batchelor AG, Liddington MI et al (2004) Tumor excision and reconstruction of the upper cervical spine: a multidisciplinary approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1534–1538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goel A, Karapurkar AP (1994) Transoral plate and screw fixation of the craniovertebral region—a preliminary report. Br J Neurosurg 8:743–745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bailey CS, Fisher CG, Boyd MC et al (2006) En bloc marginal excision of a multilevel cervical chordoma. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 4:409–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rhines LD, Fourney DR, Siadati A, Suk I et al (2005) En bloc resection of multilevel cervical chordoma with C-2 involvement. Case report and description of operative technique. J Neurosurg Spine 2:199–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sar C, Eralp L (2001) Transoral resection and reconstruction for primary osteogenic sarcoma of the second cervical vertebra. Spine 26:1936–1941

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maira G, Pallini R, Anile C et al (1996) Surgical treatment of clival chordomas: the transsphenoidal approach revisited. J Neurosurg 85:784–792

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Couldwell WT, Weiss MH, Rabb C et al (2004) Variations on the standard transsphenoidal approach to the sellar region, with emphasis on the extended approaches and parasellar approaches: surgical experience in 105 cases. Neurosurgery 55:539–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fatemi N, Dusick JR, Gorgulho AA et al (2008) Endonasal microscopic removal of clival chordomas. Surg Neurol 69:331–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Enepelcides DJ, Donald PJ (2001) Transoral approaches to the clivus and nasopharynx. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 34:1105–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stamm AC, Pignatari SS, Vellutini E (2006) Transnasal endoscopic surgical approaches to the clivus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 39:639–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elwany S, Yacout YM, Talaat M et al (1983) Surgical anatomy of the sphenoid sinus. J Laryngol Otol 97:227–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Crockard HA (1985) The transoral approach to the base of the brain and upper cervical cord. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67:321–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Harsh GR IV, Joseph MP, Swearingen B et al (1996) Anterior midline approaches to the central skull base. Clin Neurosurg 43:15–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Drake CG (1969) The surgical treatment of vertebral–basilar aneurysms. Clin Neurosurg 16:114–169

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sano K, Jinbo M, Saito I (1966) Vertebro-basilar aneurysms, with special reference to the transpharyngeal approach to basilar artery aneurysm. No To Shinkei 18:1197–1203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mullan S, Naunton R, Hekmat-Panah J et al (1966) The use of an anterior approach to ventrally placed tumors in the foramen magnum and vertebral column. J Neurosurg 24:536–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Derome PJ, Guiot G (1979) Surgical approaches to sphenoidal and clival areas. In: Krayenbuhl H (ed) Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, vol 6. Springer, Vienna, pp 101–136

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Archer DJ, Young S, Uttley D (1987) Basilar aneurysms: a new transclival approach via maxillotomy. J Neurosurg 67:54–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. James D, Crockard HA (1991) Surgical access to the base of skull and upper cervical spine by extended maxillotomy. Neurosurgery 29:411–416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Miyagi A, Maeda K, Sugawara T (1998) Usefulness of neuroendoscopy and a neuronavigator for removal of clival chordoma. No Shinkei Geka 26:169–175

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sandor GK, Charles DA, Lawson VG et al (1990) Transoral approach to the nasopharynx and clivus using the Le Fort I osteotomy with midpalatal split. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 19:352–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rabadan A, Conesa H (1992) Transmaxillary-transnasal approach to the anterior clivus: a microsurgical anatomical model. Neurosurgery 30:473–481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Janecka IP, Nuss DW, Sen CN (1991) Facial translocation approach to the cranial base. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 53:193–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Imamural J, Ikeyanma Y, Tsutida E et al (2001) Transoral transclival approach for intradural lesions using a protective bone baffle to block cerebrospinal fluid pulse energy—two cases reports. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 41:222–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by Zhejiang Top Key Discipline of Surgery, National Natural Science Foundation of China (30700843).

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang-Yang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ji, W., Wang, XY., Xu, HZ. et al. The anatomic study of clival screw fixation for the craniovertebral region. Eur Spine J 21, 1483–1491 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2151-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2151-0

Keywords

Navigation