Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The efficacy of rhBMP-2 versus autograft for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in elderly patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few studies have specifically examined the outcomes following rhBMP-2 usage in patients 65 years and older. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy of rhBMP-2 with allograft versus autograft for posterolateral lumbar fusion in patients 65 years and older. One hundred twenty-seven patients were divided into three groups based on fusion material and age. Subjects in group A (n = 34) consisted of patients 65 years and older who received rhBMP-2 and allograft. Group B (n = 52) was composed of patients under 65 years of age with rhBMP-2 and allograft. Subjects in group C (n = 41) were 65 years and older with autograft use. A comparison was made of fusion rate, fusion time (noticed, solid), clinical outcome, VAS, perioperative complications and revision rate between each group. The fusion rate and fusion time were similar in groups A and C; however, these were lower than that observed in group B. Clinical outcomes were similar amongst the groups. There were no significant differences in VAS and perioperative complication rate between groups A and C. In patients 65 years and older, rhBMP-2 with allograft may lead to acceptable fusion rates and fusion times, good clinical outcomes and reduced perioperative complications. The combination of rhBMP-2 with allograft yields equivalent outcomes as autograft in elderly patients undergoing instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. Additionally, when compared to patients under 65 years of age undergoing posterolateral lumbar fusion, the use of rhBMP-2 was not sufficient to overcome all aspects of the age-related weakened osteoinductive capacity encountered in elderly patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Dimar JR et al (2007) Clinical outcomes in older patients after posterolateral lumbar fusion. Spine J 7:547–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Li G, Patil CG, Lad SP et al (2008) Effects of age and comorbidities on complication rates and adverse outcomes after lumbar laminectomy in elderly patients. Spine 33:1250–1255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang MY, Green BA, Shah S et al (2003) Complications associated with lumbar stenosis surgery in patients older than 75 years of age. Neurosurg Focus 14:1–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton DK, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Sansur C et al (2008) Outcomes of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in mature adults: posterolateral non-instrument-assisted lumbar decompression and fusion. Surg Neurol 69:457–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT (1991) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 73:802–808

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsutsumimoto T, Shimogata M, Yoshimura Y et al (2008) Union versus nonunion after posterolateral lumbar fusion: a comparison of long-term surgical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J 17:1107–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu CH, Kao YH, Yang SC et al (2008) Supplementary pedicle screw fixation in spinal fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis in patients aged 65 and over. Acta Orthop 79:67–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bae HW, Stambaugh J, Glassman SD et al (2007) Level-1 data comparing rhBMP-2/ACS combined with an osteoconductive bulking agent with iliac crest bone graft in posterolateral lumbar fusion. Spine J 7:9s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dimar JR, Glassman SD, Burkus KJ et al (2006) Clinical outcomes and fusion success at 2 years of single-level instrumented posterolateral fusions with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2/compression resistant matrix versus iliac crest bone graft. Spine 31:2534–2539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Djurasovic M et al (2007) Posterolateral lumbar fusion with INFUSE bone graft. Spine J 7:44–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Singh K, Smucker JD, Boden SD (2006) Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 as an adjunct in posterolateral lumbar spine fusion. A prospective CT-scan analysis at one and 2 years. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:416–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Djurasovic M et al (2009) RhBMP-2 versus iliac crest bone graft for lumbar spine fusion in patients over 60 years of age. A cost-utility study. Spine 34:238–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kirkaldy-Willis WH, Paine KWE, Cauchoz J (1974) Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 99:30–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gibson S, McLeod I, Wardlaw D et al (2002) Allograft versus autograft in instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion. A randomized control trial. Spine 27:1599–1603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nasca RJ, Whelchel ILL (1987) Use of cryopreserved bone in spinal surgery. Spine 12:222–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. An HS, Lynch K, Toth J (1995) Prospective comparison of autograft vs. allograft for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: differences among freeze-dried, frozen, and mixed grafts. J Spinal Disord 8:131–135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nugent PJ, Dawson EG (1993) Intertransverse process lumbar arthrodesis with allogeneic fresh-frozen bone graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 287:107–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss LE, Vaccaro AR, Scuderi G et al (1997) Pseudarthrosis after postoperative wound infection in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 10:482–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Burkus JK, Sandhu HS, Gornet MF et al (2005) Use of rhBMP-2 in combination with structural cortical allografts: clinical and radiographic outcomes in anterior lumbar spinal surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:1205–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Slosar PJ, Josey R, Reynolds J (2007) Accelerating lumbar fusions by combining rhBMP-2 with allograft bone: a prospective analysis of interbody fusion rates and clinical outcomes. Spine J 7:301–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Glassman SD, Carreon LY, Djurasovic M et al (2008) RhBMP-2 versus iliac crest bone graft for lumbar spine fusion. A randomized, controlled trial in patients over sixty years of age. Spine 33:2843–2849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Epstein NE (2008) Fusion rates and SF-36 outcomes after multiple laminectomy and noninstrumented lumbar fusions in a predominantly geriatric population. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:159–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liang CT, Barnes J, Seedor JG et al (1992) Impaired bone activity in aged rats: alterations at the cellular and molecular levels. Bone 13:435–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Muller SM, Glowacki J (2001) Age-related decline in the osteogenic potential of human bone marrow cells cultured in three-dimensional collagen sponges. J Cell Biochem 82:583–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nyssen-Behets C, Delaere O, Duchesne PY et al (1996) Aging effect on inductive capacity of human demineralized bone matrix. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115:303–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD (1992) Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine. The influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Jt Surg Am 74:536–543

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Carreon LY, Puno RM, Dimar JR et al (2003) Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85:2089–2092

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cassinelli EH, Eubanks J, Vogt M et al (2007) Risk factors for the development of perioperative complications in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression and arthrodesis for spinal stenosis: an analysis of 166 patients. Spine 32:230–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brodsky ARE, Kovalsky ES, Khalil MA (1991) Correlation of radiologic assessment of lumbar spine fusions with surgical exploration. Spine 6(Suppl 6):S261–S265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Carreon LY, Djurasovic M, Glassman SD et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion with surgical exploration as reference standard. Spine 32:892–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Etminan M, Girardi FP, Khan SN et al (2002) Revison surgeries for lumbar pseudoarthrosis. Orthop Clin N Am 33:381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey C. Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, KB., Taghavi, C.E., Hsu, M.S. et al. The efficacy of rhBMP-2 versus autograft for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in elderly patients. Eur Spine J 19, 924–930 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1248-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1248-6

Keywords

Navigation