Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The median effective concentration of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided caudal block in children: a dose-finding study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the 50% minimum effective concentration (MEC50) and the 95% effective concentration (MEC95) of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided caudal block during hypospadias repair surgery of pediatric patients.

Methods

Children were enrolled with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I–II undergoing elective hypospadias repair surgery. Children were grouped into two age groups: toddlerhood (1–3 years old) and preschool (3–6 years old). We measured The MEC50 using Dixon’s up-and-down method. The first children received the caudal block with 1.0 mL/kg of 0.15% ropivacaine. We determined each subsequent patient’s concentration based on the previous patient’s response and adjusted the concentration in intervals of 0.015%. Meanwhile, the probit regression analysis obtains 95% effective concentration (MEC95). In addition, we recorded the general condition, adverse events, and postoperative pain of each child.

Results

46 children undergoing elective hypospadias repair surgery were included in this study, 22 in the toddlerhood group and 24 in the preschool group. Of the total number of patients, the caudal block was successful in 25 (54%) and failed in 21 (46%). The MEC50 of 1 ml/kg ropivacaine was 0.102% (95% CI 0.099%, 0.138%) in the toddlerhood group and 0.129% (95% CI 0.124%, 0.138%) in the preschool group. The MEC95 of 1 ml/kg ropivacaine was 0.148% (95% CI 0.131%, 0.149%) in the toddlerhood group and 0.162% (95% CI 0.134%, 0.164%) in the preschool group. Our results showed that ropivacaine concentration was statistically different between preschool children and toddlers (P < 0.001). None of the adverse events occurred.

Conclusions

This study showed that children in the preschool group required higher concentrations of ropivacaine than children in the toddler group during ultrasound-guided sacral block combined with non-intubated general anesthesia. At the same time, this method of anesthesia is safe and effective for children undergoing surgery for hypospadias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

References

  1. Hansen TG. Ropivacaine: a pharmacological review. Expert Rev Neurother. 2004;4(5):781–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dobereiner EF, Cox RG, Ewen A, Lardner DR. Evidence-based clinical update: which local anesthetic drug for pediatric caudal block provides optimal efficacy with the fewest side effects? Can J Anaesth. 2010;57(12):1102–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Sparks TN. Hypospadias. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(5):B18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alizadeh F, Heydari SM, Nejadgashti R. Effectiveness of caudal epidural block on interaoperative blood loss during hypospadias repair: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(5):420.e1-420.e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hong JY, Han SW, Kim WO, Cho JS, Kil HK. A comparison of high volume/low concentration and low volume/high concentration ropivacaine in caudal analgesia for pediatric orchiopexy. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(4):1073–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas ML, Roebuck D, Yule C, Howard RF. The effect of volume of local anesthetic on the anatomic spread of caudal block in children aged 1–7 years. Paediatr Anaesth. 2010;20(11):1017–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinha C, Kumar A, Sharma S, et al. Ultrasound assessment of cranial spread during caudal blockade in children: Effect of different volumes of local anesthetic. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11(4):449–53. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_284_17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dixon WJ. Staircase bioassay: the up-and-down method. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1991;15(1):47–50.

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a précis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007;107(1):144–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dimmitt S, Stampfer H, Martin JH. When less is more - efficacy with less toxicity at the ED50. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;83(7):1365–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hirabayashi Y, Shimizu R, Saitoh K, Fukuda H. Spread of subarachnoid hyperbaric amethocaine in adolescents. Br J Anaesth. 1995;74(1):41–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lönnqvist PA, Westrin P, Larsson BA, et al. Ropivacaine pharmacokinetics after caudal block in 1–8 year old children. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85(4):506–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hocking G, Wildsmith JA. Intrathecal drug spread. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93(4):568–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zadrazil M, Opfermann P, Marhofer P, Westerlund AI, Haider T. Brachial plexus block with ultrasound guidance for upper-limb trauma surgery in children: a retrospective cohort study of 565 cases. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(1):104–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Willschke H, Marhofer P, Machata AM, Lönnqvist PA. Current trends in paediatric regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(Suppl 1):97–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Benz-Wörner J, Jöhr M. Kinderanästhesie-Regionalanästhesie bei Kindern: Kaudalanästhesie und Bauchwandblockaden [Regional anaesthesia in children–caudal anaesthesia and trunk blocks]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2013;48(4):272–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deng XM, Xiao WJ, Tang GZ, Luo MP, Xu KL. The minimum local anesthetic concentration of ropivacaine for caudal analgesia in children. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(6):1465–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deng XM, Xiao WJ, Tang GZ, Luo MP, Xu KL. Minimum local analgesic concentration of ropivacaine for intra-operative caudal analgesia in pre-school and school age children. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(10):991–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Leary JD, Warner DO. What do recent human studies tell us about the association between anaesthesia in young children and neurodevelopmental outcomes? Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(3):458–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Assistance with the article: We would like to thank all staff from the Anesthesia Department and Urology Department at the Children’s Hospital affiliated with Chongqing Medical University, China, for their help with this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shengfen Tu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, Y., Li, S., Yang, F. et al. The median effective concentration of ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided caudal block in children: a dose-finding study. J Anesth 38, 179–184 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03294-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03294-1

Keywords

Navigation