Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of recommendations’ presentation on persuasion and satisfaction in a movie recommender system

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Multimedia Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The explosive growth of Internet applications and content, during the last decade, has revealed an increasing need for information filtering and recommendation. Most research in the area of recommendation systems has focused on designing and implementing efficient algorithms that provide accurate recommendations. However, the selection of appropriate recommendation content and the presentation of information are equally important in creating successful recommender applications. This paper addresses issues related to the presentation of recommendations in the movies domain. The current work reviews previous research approaches and popular recommender systems, and focuses on user persuasion and satisfaction. In our experiments, we compare different presentation methods in terms of recommendations’ organization in a list (i.e. top N-items list and structured overview) and recommendation modality (i.e. simple text, combination of text and image, and combination of text and video). The most efficient presentation methods, regarding user persuasion and satisfaction, proved to be the “structured overview” and the “text and video” interfaces, while a strong positive correlation was also found between user satisfaction and persuasion in all experimental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alliance of Women Film Journalists (AWFJ): Opinion poll: all about movie trailers. http://awfj.org/2008/05/07/awfj-opinion-poll-all-about-movie-trailers/ (2008)

  2. Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy. In: Ramachaudran, V. S., (ed.) Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol. 4, pp. 71-81, Academic Press (Reprinted in Friedman, H., [ed.] Encyclopedia of mental health. San Diego: Academic Press, 1998) (1994)

  3. Bilgic, M., Mooney, R.J.: Explaining recommendations: satisfaction vs. promotion. In: Beyond Personalization: a Workshop on the Next Stage of Recommender Systems Research at the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2005)

  4. Chen, L., Pu, P.: Trust building in recommender agents. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Web Personalization, Recommender Systems and Intelligent User Interfaces at the 2nd International Conference on E-Business and Telecommunication Networks(ICETE'02) (2005)

  5. Cosley, D., Lam, S.K., Albert, I., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Is seeing believing? How recommender system interfaces affect users’ opinions. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’03), pp. 585–592. ACM Press, New York (2003)

  6. Cramer, H., Evers, V., Ramlal, S., Someren, M., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., Aroyo, L., Wielinga, B.: The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. In: User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 18, issue 5, pp. 455–496. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2008)

  7. Dias, M.B., Locher, D., Li, M., El-Deredy, W., Lisboa, P.J.: The value of personalised recommender systems to e-business: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’08), pp. 291–294. ACM Press, New York (2008)

  8. Felfernig, A., Gula B.: Consumer behavior in the interaction with knowledge-based recommender applications. In: Proceedings of the ECAI 2006 Workshop on Recommender Systems (2006)

  9. Felfernig, A., Friedrich, G., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Guest editors’ introduction: recommender systems. IEEE Intell. Syst. 22(3):18–21 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive technologies. Commun. ACM 42(5), 26–29 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fogg, B.J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D.R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., Tauber, E.R.: How do users evaluate the credibility of websites? A study with over 2,500 participants. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences (DUX ’03), pp. 1–15. ACM Press, New York (2003)

  12. Herlocker J.: Understanding and improving automated collaborative filtering systems. Thesis, University of Minnesota (2000)

  13. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW ’00), pp. 241–250. ACM Press, New York (2000)

  14. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G., Riedl, J.T.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 5–53 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hughes, A., Wilkens, T., Wildemuth, B., Gary, M.: Text or pictures? An eyetracking study of how people view digital video surrogates. In: Bakker E.M. et al. (eds.) CIVR 2003, LNCS, vol. 2728, pp. 271–280. Springer, Berlin (2003)

  16. Iskold A.: The art, science and business of recommendation engines. Posted in ecommerce services of ReadWriteWeb technology blog. http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/recommendation_engines.php (2007)

  17. Leino, J., Räihä, K.: Case amazon: ratings and reviews as part of recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’07), pp. 137–140. ACM Press, New York (2007)

  18. Linden, G., Smith, B., York, J.: Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Comput. 07(1), 76–80 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McNee, S.M., Riedl, J., Konstan, J.A.: Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In: CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’06), pp. 1097–1101. ACM Press, New York (2006)

  20. Miller, B., Albert, I., Lam, S.K., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: MovieLens unplugged: experiences with a recommender system on four mobile devices. In: Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction Conference (HCI 2003) (2003)

  21. Montaner, M., López, B., De La Rosa, J.L.: A taxonomy of recommender agents on the Internet. Artif. Intell. Rev. 19(4), 285–330 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nageswara Rao, K., Talwar, V.G.: Application domain and functional classification of recommender systems—a survey. DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol. 28(3), 17–35 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Needleman, R.: Complete list of 2009 Webware 100 winners, CNET. http://news.cnet.com/8300-13546_109-29.html?tag=bc (2009)

  24. Nielsen, J.: Ten usability heuristics. http://www.useit.com/papers/heuristic/heuristic_list.html (2005)

  25. Perugini, S., Gonçalves, M.A., Fox, E.A.: Recommender systems research: a connection-centric survey. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 23(2):107–143 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pipino, L., Lee, Y., Wang, R.: Data quality assessment. Commun. ACM 45(4), 211–218 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Posselt, T., Gerstner, E.: Pre-sale vs. post-sale e-satisfaction: impact on purchase intention and overall satisfaction. J. Interact. Mark. 19(4), 35–47 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. PRWeb: Drupal wins best overall 2008 open source CMS award for second year in a row. http://www.prweb.com/releases/2008/10/prweb1552274.htm (2008)

  29. Pu, P.H., Kumar, P.: Evaluating example-based search tools. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC ’04), pp. 208–217. ACM Press, New York (2004)

  30. Rhoads, K.: Introduction to Influence. Retrieved from http://www.workingpsychology.com/definit.html (2002)

  31. Schafer, J.B., Konstan, J., Riedi, J.: Recommender systems in e-commerce. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 158–166. ACM Press, New York (1999)

  32. Swearingen, K., Sinha, R.: Beyond algorithms: an HCI perspective on recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGIR 2001 Workshop on Recommender Systems (2001)

  33. Swearingen, Κ., Sinha, Ρ.: Interaction design for recommender systems. In: Designing Interactive Systems. ACM Press, New York (2002)

  34. Tintarev, N.: Explaining recommendations. In: Conati C., McCoy K., Paliouras G. (eds.) UM 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4511. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

  35. Tintarev, N.: Explanations of recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’07), pp. 203–206. ACM Press, New York (2007)

  36. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Effective explanations of recommendations: user-centered design. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’07), pp. 153–156. ACM Press, New York (2007)

  37. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: Survey of explanations in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the Data Engineering Workshop (ICDE), 2007 IEEE 23rd International Conference (WPRSIUI), pp. 801–810. IEEE (2007)

  38. Tintarev, N., Masthoff, J.: The effectiveness of personalized movie explanations: an experiment using commercial meta-data. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (AH ’08), vol. 5149, pp. 204–213. Springer, Berlin (2008)

  39. Van Barneveld, J., Van Setten, J.: Designing usable interfaces for TV recommender systems. In: Ardissono L., Kobsa A., Maybury M. (eds.) Personalized Digital Television: Targeting Programs to Individual Viewers. Human-Computer Interaction Series, vol. 6, pp. 259–286. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)

  40. Wildemuth, B., Marchionini, G., Wilkens, T., Yang, M., Geisler, G., Fowler, B., Hughes, A., Mu, X.: Alternative surrogates for video objects in a digital library: users’ perspectives on their relative usability. In: Agosti M., Thanos C. (eds.) ECDL 2002, LNCS, vol. 2458, pp. 493–507. Springer, Berlin (2002)

  41. Wildemuth, B., Marchionini, G., Yang, M., Geisler, G., Wilkens, T., Hughes, A., Gruss, R.: How fast is too fast? Evaluating fast forward surrogates for digital video. In: Marshall C.C., Henry G., Delcambre L. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. IEEE Computer Society (2003)

  42. Yu, Z., Zhou, X., Yu, Z., Zhang, D., Chin, C.: An OSGi-based infrastructure for context-aware multimedia services. Commun. Mag. 44(10), 136–142 (2006). IEEE

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yu, Z., Zhou, X., Zhang, D., Chin, C., Wang, X., Men, J.: Supporting context-aware media recommendations for smart phones. Pervasive Comput. IEEE. 5(3), 68–75 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zanker, M., Bricman, M., Gordea, S., Jannach, D., Jessenitschnig, M.: Persuasive online selling in quality and taste domains. In: Bauknecht K., Pröll B., Werthner H. (eds.) EC-Web 2006, LNCS, vol. 4082, pp. 51–60. Springer, Berlin (2006)

  45. Ziegler, C.N., McNee, S.M., Konstan, J.A., Lausen, G.: Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In: Proceedings of the 14th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW2005), pp. 22–32. ACM Press, New York (2005)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Lekakos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nanou, T., Lekakos, G. & Fouskas, K. The effects of recommendations’ presentation on persuasion and satisfaction in a movie recommender system. Multimedia Systems 16, 219–230 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-010-0190-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-010-0190-0

Keywords

Navigation