Skip to main content
Log in

“Now we have to cope with the rest of our lives”. Existential issues related to parenting a child surviving a brain tumour

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The aim of the paper was to explore the existential issues expressed by parents of children who had been treated for brain tumours.

Background

A brain tumour in childhood is an event that triggers acute traumatic stress and it has long-term consequences for the child as well as for the parents. Due to advanced treatment techniques, more children survive brain tumours today. However, for most survivors a brain tumour is associated with sequelae and uncertainty about the future.

Method

Eleven parents of seven children successfully treated for brain tumours were interviewed in 2006. The semi-structured interviews were conducted by two licensed psychologists. The Inductive Thematic method was used to analyse the data.

Findings

Consequences of a perceived threat, uncertainty and loss were described in terms of grief and sadness, loneliness, changes in the conditions for parenting, and changed views regarding identity and meaning. A traumatic experience is typically followed by an existential crisis, i.e. a process of restoring the person’s assumptive world. As summarized by one parent: “Now we have to cope with the rest of our lives”. The statement can be seen as a metaphor for the reconstruction of everyday life – a new picture including the child’s disease and its sequelae, as well as the uncertainty about what the future might be like.

Conclusion

The findings underscore the importance of the social network, validating and supporting parents through this process. Moreover, in this social network the paediatric oncology and neurology care is a significant part.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arvidson J, Larsson B, Lönnerholm G (1999) A long-term follow-up study of psychosocial functioning after autologous bone marrow transplantation in childhood. Psychooncology 8(2):123–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Attig T (1996) How we grieve: relearning the world. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Attig T (2004) Meanings of death seen through the lens of grieving. Death Stud 28(4):341–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG (1999) Facilitating posttraumatic growth. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cremeens J, Eiser C, Blades M (2006) Factors influencing agreement between child self-report and parent proxy-reports on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL) generic core scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 4(58

  6. Forinder U (2004) Bone marrow transplantation from a parental perspective. J Child Health Care 8(2):134–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Forinder U, Löf C, Winiarski J (2006) Quality of life following allogeneic stem cell transplantation, comparing parents’ and children’s perspective. Pediatr Transplant 10(4):491–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Frank AW (2001) Can we research suffering? Qual Health Res 11(3):353–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harvey AG, Bryant RA, Tarrier N (2003) Cognitive behaviour therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Clin Psychol Rev 23(3):501–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hjern A, Lindblad F, Boman KK (2007) Disability in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a Swedish national cohort study. J Clin Oncol 25(33):5262–5266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson AC, Stewart H, O’Toole M, Tokatlian N, Enderby K, Miller J, Ashley D (2007) Pediatric brain tumor patients: their parents’ perceptions of the hospital experience. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 24(2):95–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Janoff-Bulman R (1992) Shattered assumptions: Towards a new psychology of trauma. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joseph S, Linley PA (2006) Growth following adversity: theoretical perspectives and implications for clinical practice. Clin Psychol Rev 26(8):1041–1053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kazak AE, Stuber ML, Barakat LP, Meeske K, Guthrie D, Meadows AT (1998) Predicting posttraumatic stress symptoms in mothers and fathers of survivors of childhood cancers. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 37(8):823–831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kvale S (1996) InterViews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. SAGE, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lillrank A (1998) Living one day at a time: parental dilemmas of managing the experience and the care of childhood cancer. National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lindahl Norberg A, Boman KK (2007) Parents’ perceptions of support when a child has cancer: a longitudinal perspective. Cancer Nurs 30(4):294–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindahl Norberg A, Steneby S (accepted April 9 2008) Parents of children surviving brain tumour: A happy ending and a rough beginning. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl),

  19. Mack JW, Grier HE (2004) The day one talk. J Clin Oncol 22(3):563–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marris P (1974) Loss and change. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Matheson K, Anisman H (2003) Systems of coping associated with dysphoria, anxiety and depressive illness: a multivariate profile perspective. Stress 6(3):223–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mulhern RK, Merchant TE, Gajjar A, Reddick WE, Kun LE (2004) Late neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of brain tumours in childhood. Lancet Oncol 5(7):399–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Phipps S (2007) Adaptive style in children with cancer: implications for a positive psychology approach. J Pediatr Psychol 32(9):1055–1066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pöder U, Ljungman G, von Essen L (2007) Posttraumatic stress disorder among parents of children on cancer treatment: a longitudinal study. Psychooncology,

  25. Quin S (2004) The long-term psychosocial effects of cancer diagnosis and treatment on children and their families. Soc Work Health Care 39(1–2):129–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Dongen-Melman JEWM, Van Zuuren FJ, Verhulst FC (1998) Experiences of parents of childhood cancer survivors: a qualitative analysis. Patient Educ Couns 34(3):185–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vance YH, Eiser C, Horne B (2004) Parents’ views of the impact of childhood brain tumours and treatment on young people’s social and family functioning. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 9(2):271–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Young B, Dixon-Woods M, Heney D (2002) Identity and role in parenting a child with cancer. Pediatr Rehabil 5(4):209–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the time and energy contributed by the parents participating. Thanks also to Sara Steneby, Lic. Psychologist, who conducted four of the interviews, and Annacarin Pal, RN, who assisted in the process of inviting parents to participate in the interviews. The study was supported by the Children’s Cancer Foundation of Sweden (RKT05/006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulla Forinder.

Additional information

Annika Lindahl Norberg and Ulla Forinder have contributed equally to the paper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forinder, U., Lindahl Norberg, A. “Now we have to cope with the rest of our lives”. Existential issues related to parenting a child surviving a brain tumour. Support Care Cancer 18, 543–551 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0678-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0678-3

Keywords

Navigation