Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation modeling and analysis on the network effects of multi-value chain based on the third-party manufacturing platform

  • Soft computing in decision making and in modeling in economics
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the rapid development of information technology, third-party platforms have emerged and become the important channels to promote collaborations among manufacturing enterprises. Under this background, this paper focuses on a third-party platform whose multilateral users are manufacturers, suppliers, and logistics providers. There exist various cross-side network effects (i.e., CNEs) and same-side network effects (i.e., SNEs) among users (including manufacturers, suppliers, and logistics providers) at different development stages of the platform, which may affect the multi-value chain collaboration of users positively or negatively. By building a system dynamics model, this paper examines the interactions of the network effects and analyzes their impacts on the multi-value chain collaboration and platform’s revenues. Then, the key factors that affect the network effect interactions are explored. The results show that the network effect interactions are significant in the early development stage of the platform. The growth of the SNEs of suppliers and logistics providers has significant impacts on their own CNEs and profits. Interestingly, the increase of manufacturers’ SNEs can affect the CNEs of their own and suppliers simultaneously, which may decrease the profits of other participants but does not change their own profits. Affected by multiple network effects, the platform needs to implement a differentiated pricing strategy for its users. That is, the platform should charge suppliers and logistics providers access fee while giving manufacturers a certain subsidy. These findings can provide some valuable insights to the operation of the third-party platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this paper are available within the article.

References

  • Anari Z, Hatamlou A, Masdari M (2020) CALA-FOMF: a continuous action-set learning automata-based approach to finding optimized membership functions for fuzzy association rules in web usage data. Soft Comput 24:18089–18112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson EG, Parker GG, Tan B (2014) Platform performance investment in the presence of network externalities. Inf Syst Res 25(1):152–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos Y, Halaburda H (2020) Platform competition with multi-homing on both sides: subsidize or not? Manag Sci 66(12):5599–5607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos Y, Katsamakas E (2008) Design and ownership of two-sided networks: implications for internet platforms. J Manag Inf Syst 25(2):171–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balocco R, Perego A, Perotti S (2010) B2B eMarketplaces: a classification framework to analyze business models and critical success factors. Ind Manag Data Syst 110(8):1117–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu A, Bhaskaran S, Mukherjee R (2019) An analysis of search and authentication strategies for online matching platforms. Manag Sci 65(5):2412–2431

    Google Scholar 

  • Chellappa RK, Mukherjee R (2021) Platform preannouncement strategies: the strategic role of information in two-sided markets competition. Manag Sci 67(3):1527–1545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu J, Manchanda P (2016) Quantifying cross and direct network effects in online consumer-to-consumer platforms. Mark Sci 35(6):870–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou G, Lin X, Xu X (2018) Value-added service investment strategy of a two-sided platform with the negative intra-group network externality. Kybernetes 47(5):937–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans DS (2003) Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries. Rev Netw Econ 2(3):191–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu WH, Wang Q, Zhao XD (2017) The influence of platform service innovation on value co-creation activities and the network effect. J Serv Manag 28(2):348–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu A, Hałaburda H (2014) Information and two-sided platform profits. Int J Ind Organ 34:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halaburda H, Piskorski MJ, Yildirim P (2018) Competing by restricting choice: the case of matching platforms. Manag Sci 64(8):3574–3594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Xiao TJ (2020) Preannouncement strategy of platform-type new product for competing platforms: technical or marketing information. J Ind Manag Optim. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2020155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joghee S (2021) Internet of things-assisted E-marketing and distribution framework. Soft Comput 25:12291–12303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karthiban K, Raj JS (2020) An efficient green computing fair resource allocation in cloud computing using modified deep reinforcement learning algorithm. Soft Comput 24:14933–14942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Zhang Y (2020) The side with larger network externality should be targeted aggressively? Monopoly pricing, reference price and two-sided markets. Electron Commer R A 43:100995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Shen Q, Bart Y (2021) Dynamic resource allocation on multi-category two-sided platforms. Manag Sci 67(2):984–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Chen DQ, Gao W (2020) How does customer orientation (in) congruence affect B2B electronic commerce platform firms’ performance? Ind Mark Manag 87:18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loux P, Aubry M, Sébastien T, Baudoin E (2019) Multi-sided platforms in B2B contexts: the role of affiliation costs and interdependencies in adoption decisions. Ind Mark Manag 84:212–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucking-Reiley D, Spulber DF (2001) Business-to-business electronic commerce. J Econ Perspect 15(1):55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manasrah AM, Abu Nasir M, Salem M (2020) A privacy-preserving multi-keyword search approach in cloud computing. Soft Comput 24:5609–5631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre DP, Srinivasan A (2017) Networks, platforms, and strategy: emerging views and next steps. Strateg Manag J 38(1):141–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohtaramzadeh M, Ramayah T, Jun-Hwa C (2018) B2B E-commerce adoption in Iranian manufacturing companies: analyzing the moderating role of organizational culture. Int J Hum Comput Int 34(7):621–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song T, Liu H, Wei C, Zhang C (2014) Common engines of cloud manufacturing service platform for SMEs. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(1–4):557–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thitimajshima W, Esichaikul V, Krairit D (2018) A framework to identify factors affecting the performance of third-party B2B e-marketplaces: a seller’s perspective. Electron Mark 28(2):129–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veerabathiran VK, Mani D, Kuppusamy S, Subramaniam B, Velayutham P, Sengan S, Krishnamoorthy S (2020) Improving secured ID-based authentication for cloud computing through novel hybrid fuzzy-based homomorphic proxy re-encryption. Soft Comput 24:18893–18908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Chen H, Wu D (2019) Regulating platform competition in two-sided markets under the O2O era. Int J Prod Econ 215(S1):131–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie J, Zhu W, Wei L, Liang L (2021) Platform competition with partial multi-homing: when both same-side and cross-side network effects exist. Int J Prod Econ 233:108016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo B, Choudhary V, Mukhopadhyay T (2002) A model of neutral B2B intermediaries. J Manag Inf Syst 19(3):43–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Li P, Wang N (2021) Multi-period price competition of blockchain-technology-supported and traditional platforms under network effect. Int J Prod Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1884308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Yao X (2017) A hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for optimal selection of QoS-based cloud manufacturing service composition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9–12):3371–3387

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support by the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant number 2018YFB1701502) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant number 2019CDCGJG332), as well as the contributions from all partners of the mentioned project.

Funding

This work was supported by [the National Key Research and Development Program] (Grant number [2018YFB1701502]) and [the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities] (Grant number [2019CDCGJG332]).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [RS], [XZ], [YL], [YD] and [WL]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [RS], and all the authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript. Conceptualization: [RS], [XZ], [YL], [YD], [WL]; methodology: [RS], [XZ], [YL]; formal analysis and investigation: [RS], [XZ], [YL], [YD], [WL]; writing—original draft preparation: [RS], [XZ], [YL], [YD], [WL]; writing—review and editing: [RS], [XZ], [YL], [YD]; funding acquisition: [XZ]; resources: [RS], [XZ]; supervision: [RS]; [XZ].

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xumei Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. All the authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

Ethical approval

Ethics approval was not involved in this research.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not involved in this research.

Authorship clarified

We confirm that all the authors agree with the content and give explicit consent to submit. It is confirmed that the manuscript has obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institute before the work is submitted. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us, and there are no other persons who satisfy the criteria for authorship but are not listed. Besides, we confirm that we have given due consideration to the protection of intellectual property associated with this work and there are no impediments to publication, including the timing of publication, with respect to intellectual property. In so doing, we confirm that we have followed the regulations of our institutions concerning intellectual property. We understand that the Corresponding Author is the sole contact for the Editorial process (including connection with Editorial Manager and direct communication with the office). He/she is responsible for communicating with the other authors about progress, submissions of revisions and final approval of proofs. We confirm that all listed authors have approved the manuscript before submission, including the names and order of authors. We further confirm that we have provided a current, correct email address which is accessible by the Corresponding Author and which has been configured to accept email from: zhangxumei@cqu.edu.cn.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sui, R., Zhang, X., Liu, Y. et al. Simulation modeling and analysis on the network effects of multi-value chain based on the third-party manufacturing platform. Soft Comput 28, 235–252 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09102-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09102-y

Keywords

Navigation