Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of profitability and efficiency of regulatory acts on energy-intensive industries: a panel data methodology and case study in India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Energy sources are of paramount significance in the contemporary landscape, categorically classified into two main types: (i) primary sources, encompassing a wide spectrum ranging from nuclear energy to fossil fuels like natural gas and oil; and (ii) renewable sources, including geothermal, hydropower, solar, and wind energies. Governments have taken proactive measures since 2010, culminating in the establishment of the Bureau of Energy Efficiency under the Energy Conservation Act, aimed at curtailing energy consumption across diverse economic sectors. The interconnectedness of energy consumption, environmental ramifications, and economic progress is undeniable. A noteworthy project originating in 2010 is rooted in the pioneering market-based mechanism known as the perform, achieve, and trade (PAT) framework, which predominantly targets industrial energy utilization. Given the substantial role of energy costs within the broader spectrum of total production expenses, it becomes imperative to gauge the profit margin intensity (PMI) within energy-intensive sectors and industries encompassed by the PAT initiative. This entails an exploration of the influence exerted by these sectors on PMI. Consequently, the identification of variables influencing industrial profitability with respect to energy employment becomes pivotal. This article introduces a methodology grounded in panel data analysis, applied to a specific case study involving Indian energy-intensive corporations. The investigation takes into account the impact of both the Energy Conservation Act (ECA) and PAT as dichotomous covariates. Notably, the ambit of PAT encompasses the eight most energy-intensive industries in India, spanning the years 2012 to 2015. India stands among the world’s foremost energy consumers, with its industrial sector notably emerging as the largest energy consumer in 2015. Evidently, energy serves as a driving force behind the country’s manufacturing costs. The findings of this study underscore a negative correlation between energy costs and profitability. While the overall impact of PAT on industry performance appears limited, the ECA emerges as a potent factor significantly affecting earnings. Moreover, a compelling indirect relationship between energy costs and profitability is discerned, wherein rising revenues correspondingly lead to amplified energy costs. Consequently, the implications drawn from our study are intricately linked to the efficacy of energy utilization regulations within energy-intensive industrial contexts. The statistical analyses integral to this study were diligently carried out using the R software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baltagi BH (2021) Econometric analysis of panel data. Edition 6. Springer, New York, NY, USA

  • Bertoldi P, Rezessy S, Lees E, Baudry P, Jeandel A, Labanca N (2010) Energy supplier obligations and white certificate schemes: comparative analysis of experiences in the European Union. Energy Policy 38:1455–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari D, Shrimali G (2017) The perform, achieve and trade scheme in India: an effectiveness analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:1286–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari D, Shrimali G (2018) The perform, achieve and trade scheme in India: An effectiveness analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:1286–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona M, Feria J, Golpe AA, Iglesias J (2017) Energy consumption in the US reconsidered. Evidence across sources and economic sectors. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 77:1055–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow GC (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28:591–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen AC, Wettestad J (2003) The EU as a frontrunner on greenhouse gas emissions trading: how did it happen and will the EU succeed? Clim Policy 3:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson PM, Li Y, Pinnuck M, Richardson GD (2015) The valuation relevance of greenhouse gas emissions under the European Union carbon emissions trading scheme. Eur Account Rev 24:551–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta S, Roy J (2017) Analysing energy intensity trends and decoupling of growth from energy use in Indian manufacturing industries during 1973–1974 to 2011–2012. Energ Effic 10:925–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Andrade Guerra JBSO, Berchin II, Garcia J et al (2021) A literature-based study on the water-energy-food nexus for sustainable development. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 35:95–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Rue du Can S, Khandekar A, Abhyankar N, Phadke A, Khanna NZ, Fridley D, Zhou N (2019) Modeling India’s energy future using a bottom-up approach. Appl Energy 238:1108–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta M, Mukherjee S (2010) An outlook into energy consumption in large scale industries in India: the cases of steel, aluminium and cement. Energy Policy 38:7286–7298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzò S, Frattini F, Cagno E, Trianni A (2019) A multi-stakeholder analysis of the economic efficiency of industrial energy efficiency policies: empirical evidence from ten years of the Italian white certificate scheme. Appl Energy 240:424–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaurav N, Sivasankari S, Kiran GS, Ninawe A, Selvin J (2017) Utilization of bioresources for sustainable biofuels: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 73:205–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2008) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, Saddle River, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrin J, Vine E, Sharick A (2007). The potential for energy savings certificates as a major tool in greenhouse gas reduction programs. Report of the Center for Resource Solutions, Henry P. Kendall Foundation, Boston, MA, USA. Available at: http://resource-solutions.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Draft_Report_ESC_V12_cleanFINAL_5-24-07.pdf

  • Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (2007) Panel data analysis-advantages and challenges. TEST 16:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C, Mountain DC, HO-Illman K (1995) Bayesian Integration of end use metering and conditional deman analysis. J Econom 109:107–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudedmani MG, Soppimath VM, Hubballi SV, Kundur Z (2019) Perform achieve and trade (PAT) a revolutionary measure in energy efficiency and conservation-review. Int J Adv Sci Eng 6:1206–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A (2003) Energy intensity: a quantitative exploration for Indian manufacturing. IGIDR Working Paper, 152. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=468440

  • Kumar R, Agarwala AK (2013) Renewable energy certificate and perform, achieve, trade mechanisms to enhance the energy security for India. Energy Policy 55:669–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langniss O, Praetorius B (2006) How much market do market-based instruments create? An analysis for the case of white certificates. Energy Policy 34:200–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liming H (2009) Financing rural renewable energy: a comparison between China and India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:1096–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee K (2008) Energy use efficiency in US manufacturing: a nonparametric analysis. Energy Econ 30:76–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oak H (2017) Factors influencing energy intensity of Indian cement industry. Int J Environ Sci Dev 8:331–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu SK, Narayanan K (2014) Energy use patterns and firm performance: evidence from Indian industries. J Energy Dev 40:111–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahu S, Narayanan K (2009) Determinants of energy intensity: a preliminary investigation of Indian manufacturing industries. In: Proceedings of the 44th conference of The Indian Econometrics Society, 16606. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/16606/1/MPRA_paper_16606.pdf

  • Saikawa E, Trail M, Zhong M et al (2017) Uncertainties in emissions estimates of greenhouse gases and air pollutants in India and their impacts on regional air quality. Environ Res Lett 12:065002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Roy H, Dalei NN (2019) Estimation of energy intensity in Indian iron and steel sector: a panel data analysis. Stat Trans New Ser 20:107–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer U, Varilek M (2004) Estimating the price of tradable permits for greenhouse gas emissions in 2008–12. Energy Policy 32:611–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng Y (2012) Indigenous R &D, technology imports and energy consumption intensity: evidence from industrial sectors in China. Energy Procedia 16:2019–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO (2012) Industrial energy efficiency for sustainable wealth creation: capturing environmental, economic and social dividends. Industrial Development Report 2011, United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), Vienna, Austria.

  • Vasudevan R, Cherail K, Bhatia R, Jayaram N (2011) Energy efficiency in India: history and overview. Alliance for an Energy Efficient Economy, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek M (2008) A guide to modern econometrics. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Vig S, Datta M (2023) The impact of corporate governance on sustainable value creation: a case of selected Indian firms. J Sustain Finance Invest. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1923337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vine E, Hamrin J (2008) Energy savings certificates: a market-based tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 36:467–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Yuan X, Ren L, Ma C, Zhang K (2010) Is there a concrete relationship between energy consumption, economic development and environmental load in developing economies? A case study in Shandong Province, China. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 24:1225–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZX (1998) Greenhouse gas emission trading and the world trading system. J World Trade 32:219–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Víctor Leiva.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, P., Sharma, A., Leiva, V. et al. Assessment of profitability and efficiency of regulatory acts on energy-intensive industries: a panel data methodology and case study in India. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 37, 5009–5027 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02536-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-023-02536-8

Keywords

Navigation