Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic definitive surgery for congenital biliary dilatation with aggressive hilar bile ductoplasty and complete resection of the intrapancreatic bile duct in pediatric patients is safe and effective, comparable to open surgery

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

After surgery for congenital biliary dilatation (CBD), hilar and hepatic bile duct stenosis and intrapancreatic bile duct remnants can cause many postoperative complications. We investigated the efficacy of laparoscopic surgery with aggressive bile ductoplasty and complete excision of the intrapancreatic bile duct in CBD patients compared to open surgery.

Methods

Pediatric patients who underwent surgery for CBD at our institution between 2006 and 2020 were divided into two groups: laparoscopic surgery (Lap group) and open surgery (Op group). Surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

Results

We enrolled 160 patients (85 in the Lap group and 75 in the Op group). Hilar bile ductoplasty was performed in 52 (61%) patients from the Lap group and 40 (53%) patients from the Op group. The operative time was significantly longer, the amount of blood loss was significantly lower, and the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Lap group than in the Op group. Postoperative early and late complications occurred at a similarly low rate in both groups. When the surgical outcomes were compared between the group who underwent laparoscopic bile ductoplasty and the group that did not, postoperative early and late complications occurred similarly in both groups.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic surgery for CBD with aggressive hilar bile ductoplasty and complete excision of the intrapancreatic bile duct is safe and effective, comparable to open surgery. However, it is necessary to verify whether long-term occurrence of hepatolithiasis similar to open definitive surgery can be obtained in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kasai M, Asakura Y, Taira Y (1970) Surgical treatment of choledochal cyst. Ann Surg 172:844–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lilly JR (1978) Total excision of choledochal cyst. Surg Gynecol Obstet 146:254–256

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ishibashi H, Shimada M, Kamisawa T, Fujii H, Hamada Y, Kubota M et al (2017) Japanese Study Group on Congenital Biliary Dilatation (JSCBD) Japanese clinical practice guidelines for congenital biliary dilatation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Todani T, Watanabe Y, Toki A, Urushihara N, Sato Y (1988) Reoperation for congenital choledochal cyst. Ann Surg 207:142–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chijiiwa K, Tanaka M (1994) Late complications after excisional operation in patients with choledochal cyst. J Am Coll Surg 179:139–144

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ando H, Ito T, Kaneko K, Seo T, Ito F (1996) Intrahepatic bile duct stenosis causing intrahepatic calculi formation following excision of a choledochal cyst. J Am Coll Surg 183:56–60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amano H, Shirota C, Tainaka T, Sumida W, Yokota K, Makita S et al (2021) Late postoperative complications of congenital biliary dilatation in pediatric patients: a single-center experience of managing complications for over 20 years. Surg Today 51:1488–1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shirota C, Kawashima H, Tainaka T, Sumida W, Yokota K, Makita S et al (2021) Double-balloon endoscopic retrograde cholangiography can make a reliable diagnosis and good prognosis for postoperative complications of congenital biliary dilatation. Sci Rep 11:11052

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ando H, Kaneko K, Ito T, Watanabe Y, Seo T, Harada T et al (1996) Complete excision of the intrapancreatic portion of choledochal cysts. J Am Coll Surg 183:317–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Farello GA, Cerofolini A, Rebonato M, Bergamaschi G, Ferrari C, Chiappetta A (1995) Congenital choledochal cyst: video-guided laparoscopic treatment. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:354–358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Amano H, Uchida H, Kawashima H, Deie K, Murase N, Makita S et al (2015) The umbilical Benz incision for reduced port surgery in pediatric patients. JSLS 19(e2014):00238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ure BM, Schier F, Schmidt AI, Nustede R, Petersen C, Jesch NK (2005) Laparoscopic resection of congenital choledochal cyst, choledochojejunostomy, and extraabdominal Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Surg Endosc 19:1055–1057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. She WH, Chung HY, Lan LCL, Wong KKY, Saing H, Tam PKH (2009) Management of choledochal cyst: 30 years of experience and results in a single center. J Pediatr Surg 44:2307–2311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liem NT, Pham HD, Vu HM (2011) Is the laparoscopic operation as safe as open operation for choledochal cyst in children? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Technol A 21:367–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liuming H, Hongwu Z, Gang L, Jun J, Wenying H, Wong KKY et al (2011) The effect of laparoscopic excision vs open excision in children with choledochal cyst: a midterm follow-up study. J Pediatr Surg 46:662–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Urushihara N, Fukumoto K, Fukuzawa H, Mitsunaga M, Watanabe K, Aoba T et al (2012) Long-term outcomes after excision of choledochal cysts in a single institution: operative procedures and late complications. J Pediatr Surg 47:2169–2174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhen C, Xia Z, Long L, Lishuang M, Pu Y, Wenjuan Z et al (2015) Laparoscopic excision versus open excision for the treatment of choledochal cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Surg 100:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Diao M, Li L, Cheng W (2011) Laparoscopic versus open Roux-en-Y hepatojejunostomy for children with choledochal cysts: intermediate-term follow-up results. Surg Endosc 25:1567–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ando H, Ito T, Kaneko K, Seo T (1995) Congenital stenosis of the intrahepatic bile duct associated with choledochal cysts. J Am Coll Surg 181:426–430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ando H, Kaneko K, Ito F, Seo T, Ito T (1997) Operative treatment of congenital stenoses of the intrahepatic bile ducts in patients with choledochal cysts. Am J Surg 173:491–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Urushihara N, Fukuzawa H, Fukumoto K, Sugiyama A, Nagae H, Watanabe K et al (2011) Totally laparoscopic management of choledochal cyst: Roux-en-Y jejunojejunostomy and wide hepaticojejunostomy with hilar ductoplasty. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tanaka Y, Tainaka T, Sumida W, Shirota C, Hinoki A, Murase N et al (2017) The efficacy of resection of intrahepatic bile duct stenosis-causing membrane or septum for preventing hepatolithiasis after choledochal cyst excision. J Pediatr Surg 52:1930–1933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanaka Y, Tainaka T, Sumida W, Hinoki A, Shirota C, Murase N et al (2018) Introduction of resection of intrahepatic bile duct stenosis-causing membrane or septum into laparoscopic choledochal cyst excision. Pediatr Surg Int 34:1087–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Todani T, Watanabe Y, Urushihara N, Noda T, Morotomi Y (1995) Biliary complications after excisional procedure for choledochal cyst. J Pediatr Surg 30:478–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jalleh RP, Williamson RC (1991) Choledochal cyst and chronic pancreatitis–treated by proximal pancreatectomy. HPB Surg 4:245–249 (discussion 250)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yoshikawa K, Yoshida K, Shirai Y, Sato N, Kashima Y, Coutinho DS et al (1986) A case of carcinoma arising in the intrapancreatic terminal choledochus 12 years after primary excision of a giant choledochal cyst. Am J Gastroenterol 81:378–384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Urushihara N, Fukumoto K, Yamoto M, Miyake H, Takahashi T, Nomura A et al (2018) Characteristics, management, and outcomes of congenital biliary dilatation in neonates and early infants: a 20-year, single-institution study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 25:544–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was provided for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahisa Tainaka.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Takahisa Tainaka, Chiyoe Shirota, Akinari Hinoki, Wataru Sumida, Kazuki Yokota, Satoshi Makita, Hizuru Amano, Yujiro Tanaka and Hiroo Uchida declare no conflicts of interest for this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tainaka, T., Shirota, C., Hinoki, A. et al. Laparoscopic definitive surgery for congenital biliary dilatation with aggressive hilar bile ductoplasty and complete resection of the intrapancreatic bile duct in pediatric patients is safe and effective, comparable to open surgery. Surg Endosc 36, 7352–7359 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09132-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09132-x

Keywords

Navigation