Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of post-operative dysphagia following anti-reflux surgery

  • 2021 SAGES Oral
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anti-reflux surgery (ARS) has known long-term complications, including dysphagia, bloat, and flatulence, among others. The factors affecting the development of post-operative dysphagia are poorly understood. We investigated the correlation of intra-operative esophagogastric junction (EGJ) characteristics and procedure type with post-operative dysphagia following ARS.

Methods

Robotic ARS was performed on 197 consecutive patients with pathologic reflux utilizing EndoFLIP™ technology. Intraoperative EGJ measurements including distensibility index (DI), cross-sectional area (CSA), and high-pressure zone (HPZ) length were collected. Dysphagia was assessed pre-operatively and at 3 months post-operatively.

Results

The median pre-operative DI for all procedures was 2.6 (IQR 1.6–4.5) mm2/mmHg. There was no difference in post-operative DI between procedures [Hill: 0.9 (IQR 0.7–1.1) mm2/mmHg, Nissen: 1.0 (IQR 0.7–1.4) mm2/mmHg, Toupet: 1.2 (IQR 0.8–1.5) mm2/mmHg, Linx: 1.0 (IQR 0.7–1.2) mm2/mmHg, p = 0.24], whereas post-operative HPZ length differed by augmentation type [Hill: 3 (IQR 2.8–3) cm, Nissen: 3.5 (IQR 3–3.5) cm, Toupet: 3 (IQR 2.5–3.5) cm, Linx: 2.5 (IQR 2.5–3) cm, p = 0.032].

Eighty-nine patients (45.2%) had pre-operative dysphagia. Thirty-two patients (27.6%) reported any dysphagia at their 3-month post-operative visit and 12 (10.3%) developed new or worsening post-operative dysphagia [Hill: 2/18 (11.1%), Nissen: 2/35 (5.7%), Toupet: 4/54 (7.4%), Linx: 4/9 (44.4%), p = 0.006]. The median pre-operative and post-operative DI of patients who developed new or worsening dysphagia was 2.0 (IQR 0.9–3.8) mm2/mmHg and 1.2 (IQR 1.0–1.8) mm2/mmHg, respectively, and that of those who did not was 2.5 (IQR 1.6–4.0) mm2/mmHg and 1.0 (IQR 0.7–1.4) mm2/mmHg (p = 0.21 and 0.16, respectively).

Conclusions

Post-operative DI was similar between procedures, and there was no correlation with new or worsening post-operative dysphagia. Linx placement was associated with higher rates of new or worsening post-operative dysphagia despite a shorter post-procedure HPZ length and similar post-operative DI when compared to other methods of LES augmentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cho SY, Choung RS, Saito YA, Schleck CD, Zinsmeister AR, Locke GR III et al (2015) Prevalence and risk factors for dysphagia: a USA community study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 27(2):212–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shin GH, Sankineni A, Parkman HP (2014) Bolus retention in hiatal hernia identified by high-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance. Neurogastroenterol Motil 26(5):679–684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Philpott H, Sweis R (2017) Hiatus hernia as a cause of dysphagia. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 19(8):40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nwokedi U, Nguyen DT, Meisenbach LM, Chihara R, Chan EY, Graviss EA et al (2020) Short-term outcome of routine use of EndoFLIP during hiatal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 35(7):3840–3849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Su B, Callahan ZM, Novak S, Kuchta K, Ujiki MB (2020) Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) to evaluate myotomy and predict outcomes after surgery for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 24(4):964–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Patterson EJ, Herron DM, Hansen PD, Ramzi N, Standage BA, Swanstrom LL (2000) Effect of an esophageal bougie on the incidence of dysphagia following Nissen fundoplication: a prospective, blinded, randomized clinical trial. Arch Surg 135(9):1055–1061; discussion 61–62

  7. Catarci M, Gentileschi P, Papi C, Carrara A, Marrese R, Gaspari AL et al (2004) Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication. Ann Surg 239(3):325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Su B, Novak S, Callahan ZM, Kuchta K, Carbray J, Ujiki MB (2020) Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) in the operating room to assess gastroesophageal junction distensibility and predict patient outcomes following fundoplication. Surg Endosc 34(4):1761–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ayazi S, Zheng P, Zaidi AH, Chovanec K, Chowdhury N, Salvitti M et al (2020) Magnetic sphincter augmentation and postoperative dysphagia: characterization, clinical risk factors, and management. J Gastrointest Surg 24(1):39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stylopoulos N, Rattner DW (2005) The history of hiatal hernia surgery: from Bowditch to laparoscopy. Ann Surg 241(1):185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perretta S, McAnena O, Botha A, Nathanson L, Swanstrom L, Soper NJ et al (2013) Acta from the EndoFLIP(R) Symposium. Surg Innov 20(6):545–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stefanova DI, Limberg JN, Ullmann TM, Liu M, Thiesmeyer JW, Beninato T et al (2020) Quantifying factors essential to the integrity of the esophagogastric junction during antireflux procedures. Ann Surg 272(3):488–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Richter JE, Rubenstein JH (2018) Presentation and epidemiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 154(2):267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yadlapati R, Hungness ES, Pandolfino JE (2018) Complications of antireflux surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 113(8):1137–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu M, Stefanova DI, Finnerty BM, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Katz PO, Fahey TJ III et al (2021) The impact of pneumoperitoneum on esophagogastric junction distensibility during anti-reflux surgery. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08291-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Bradley DD, Louie BE, Farivar AS, Wilshire CL, Baik PU, Aye RW (2015) Assessment and reduction of diaphragmatic tension during hiatal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 29(4):796–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fei L, del Genio G, Rossetti G, Sampaolo S, Moccia F, Trapani V et al (2009) Hiatal hernia recurrence: surgical complication or disease? Electron microscope findings of the diaphragmatic pillars. J Gastrointest Surg 13(3):459–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Horgan S, Pohl D, Bogetti D, Eubanks T, Pellegrini C (1999) Failed antireflux surgery: what have we learned from reoperations? Arch Surg 134(8):809–815; discussion 15–17

  19. Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU (2002) Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(22):2453–2458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ngamruengphong S, von Rahden BH, Filser J, Tyberg A, Desai A, Sharaiha RZ et al (2016) Intraoperative measurement of esophagogastric junction cross-sectional area by impedance planimetry correlates with clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 30(7):2886–2894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Asti E, Aiolfi A, Lazzari V, Sironi A, Porta M, Bonavina L (2018) Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies. Updates Surg 70(3):323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. Paul Christos was partially supported by the following Grant: Clinical and Translational Science Center at Weill Cornell Medical College (1-UL1-TR002384-01).

Funding

This study was internally funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rasa Zarnegar.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Rasa Zarnegar works as a consultant for Bard (BD). Dr. Philip Katz works as a consultant for Phathom Pharma. Jacques A. Greenberg, Dessislava I. Stefanova, Fernando Valle Reyes, Rodrigo C.L. Edelmuth, Lamia Harik, Jessica W. Thiesmeyer, Caitlin E. Egan, Federico Palacardo, Mengyuan Liu, Paul Christos, Felice H Schnoll-Sussman, Brendan M. Finnerty, and Thomas J. Fahey III have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Greenberg, J.A., Stefanova, D.I., Reyes, F.V. et al. Evaluation of post-operative dysphagia following anti-reflux surgery. Surg Endosc 36, 5456–5466 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08888-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08888-y

Keywords

Navigation