Skip to main content
Log in

Can laparoscopic liver resection provide a favorable option for patients with large or multiple intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The role of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for large or multiple intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICCs) remains equivocal. The main concerns are potential risks of inadequate resection margin, tumor rupture, uncontrollable bleeding, tumor seeding, and inadequate lymph node sampling. In this study, we aimed to determine the safety, feasibility, and oncological efficacy of LLR for large (≥5 cm) or multiple (≥2) ICCs.

Methods

Among 50 patients receiving liver resection for ICC between May 2004 and January 2016, 12 patients who had undergone LLR for large or multiple ICCs (Group A, n = 12) were compared with 18 patients who had undergone LLR for small solitary ICCs (Group B, n = 18), as well were compared with 20 patients who had undergone open liver resection for large or multiple ICCs (Group C, n = 20). Perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Compared with Group B, Group A had fewer patients with T1 tumors (58.3 vs. 100%; P = 0.006) and a longer hospital stay (14 vs. 9 days; P = 0.039); operating time, blood loss, surgical margin, cases receiving lymph node dissection, conversion rates, and morbidity were comparable. There were no life-threatening complications and no mortality. No tumor rupture or dissemination occurred, nor did port-site recurrence follow surgery. After a median follow-up of 22 months, no difference was noted in 3-year overall survival (56.3 vs. 59.5%; P > 0.05) and recurrence-free survival (43.8 vs. 50%; P > 0.05) between the two groups. Similarly, perioperative and long-term outcomes were comparable between Group A and Group C.

Conclusion

LLR for large or multiple ICCs is technically safe, feasible, and oncologically effective in select patients. It provides a favorable option for patients seeking curative treatment. The minimally invasive nature will benefit these patients without compromising the oncological efficacy. Future larger-scale studies and well-designed randomized trials are warranted to evaluate this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bridgewater J, Galle PR, Khan SA, Llovet JM, Park JW, Patel T, Pawlik TM, Gores GJ (2014) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 60(6):1268–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel T (2001) Increasing incidence and mortality of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Hepatology 33(6):1353–1357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shaib Y, El-Serag HB (2004) The epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 24(2):115–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saha SK, Zhu AX, Fuchs CS, Brooks GA (2016) Forty-year trends in cholangiocarcinoma incidence in the U.S.: intrahepatic disease on the rise. Oncologist 21(5):594–599

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hyder O, Hatzaras I, Sotiropoulos GC, Paul A, Alexandrescu S, Marques H, Pulitano C, Barroso E, Clary BM, Aldrighetti L, Ferrone CR, Zhu AX, Bauer TW, Walters DM, Groeschl R, Gamblin TC, Marsh JW, Nguyen KT, Turley R, Popescu I, Hubert C, Meyer S, Choti MA, Gigot JF, Mentha G, Pawlik TM (2013) Recurrence after operative management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery 153(6):811–818

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Spolverato G, Yakoob MY, Kim Y, Alexandrescu S, Marques HP, Lamelas J, Aldrighetti L, Gamblin TC, Maithel SK, Pulitano C, Bauer TW, Shen F, Poultsides GA, Marsh JW, Pawlik TM (2015) The impact of surgical margin status on long-term outcome after resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 22(12):4020–4028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Doussot A, Groot-Koerkamp B, Wiggers JK, Chou J, Gonen M, DeMatteo RP, Allen PJ, Kingham TP, D’Angelica MI, Jarnagin WR (2015) Outcomes after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: external validation and comparison of prognostic models. J Am Coll Surg 221(2):452–461

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Vitale A, Spolverato G, Bagante F, Gani F, Popescu I, Marques HP, Aldrighetti L, Gamblin TC, Maithel SK, Sandroussi C, Bauer TW, Shen F, Poultsides GA, Marsh JW, Pawlik TM (2016) A multi-institutional analysis of elderly patients undergoing a liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 113(4):420–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jutric Z, Johnston WC, Hoen HM, Newell PH, Cassera MA, Hammill CW, Wolf RF, Hansen PD (2016) Impact of lymph node status in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated by major hepatectomy: a review of the National Cancer Database. HPB (Oxford) 18(1):79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, Asbun H, O’Rourke N, Tanabe M, Koffron AJ, Tsung A, Soubrane O, Machado MA, Gayet B, Troisi RI, Pessaux P, Van Dam RM, Scatton O, Abu Hilal M, Belli G, Kwon CH, Edwin B, Choi GH, Aldrighetti LA, Cai X, Cleary S, Chen KH, Schon MR, Sugioka A, Tang CN, Herman P, Pekolj J, Chen XP, Dagher I, Jarnagin W, Yamamoto M, Strong R, Jagannath P, Lo CM, Clavien PA, Kokudo N, Barkun J, Strasberg SM (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G (2016) Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 263(4):761–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aldrighetti L, Guzzetti E, Pulitano C, Cipriani F, Catena M, Paganelli M, Ferla G (2010) Case-matched analysis of totally laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC: short and middle term results. J Surg Oncol 102(1):82–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schiffman SC, Kim KH, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA (2015) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a metaanalysis of 610 patients. Surgery 157(2):211–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoon SY, Kim KH, Jung DH, Yu A, Lee SG (2015) Oncological and surgical results of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC less than 5 cm: case-matched analysis. Surg Endosc 29(9):2628–2634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY, Yoon CJ, Kim JH (2012) Laparoscopic approach for treatment of multiple hepatocellular carcinomas. Surg Endosc 26(11):3133–3140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ai JH, Li JW, Chen J, Bie P, Wang SG, Zheng SG (2013) Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor size of 5-10 cm. PLoS ONE 8(8):e72328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwon Y, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY (2015) Are large hepatocellular carcinomas still a contraindication for laparoscopic liver resection? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(2):98–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shelat VG, Cipriani F, Basseres T, Armstrong TH, Takhar AS, Pearce NW, AbuHilal M (2015) Pure laparoscopic liver resection for large malignant tumors: does size matter? Ann Surg Oncol 22(4):1288–1293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nomi T, Fuks D, Louvet C, Nakajima Y, Gayet B (2016) Outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection for patients with large colorectal liver metastases: a case-matched analysis. World J Surg 40(7):1702–1708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Uy BJ, Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY (2015) Laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25(4):272–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ratti F, Cipriani F, Ariotti R, Gagliano A, Paganelli M, Catena M, Aldrighetti L (2015) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based case-matched analysis from a single institution. Surg Endosc 30(5):1999–2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee W, Park JH, Kim JY, Kwag SJ, Park T, Jeong SH, Ju YT, Jung EJ, Lee YJ, Hong SC, Choi SK, Jeong CY (2016) Comparison of perioperative and oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 30(11):4835–4840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Takahashi M, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, Takeda D, Hasegawa Y, Takahara T, Ito N (2013) Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy by anterior approach with hanging maneuver for large intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 27(12):4732–4733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nathan H, Pawlik TM (2010) Staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 26(3):269–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cai X, Li Z, Zhang Y, Yu H, Liang X, Jin R, Luo F (2014) Laparoscopic liver resection and the learning curve: a 14-year, single-center experience. Surg Endosc 28(4):1334–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cai X, Duan L, Wang Y, Jiang W, Liang X, Yu H, Cai L (2016) Laparoscopic hepatectomy by curettage and aspiration: a report of 855 cases. Surg Endosc 30(7):2904–2913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Akyuz M, Yazici P, Yigitbas H, Dural C, Okoh A, Aliyev S, Aucejo F, Quintini C, Fung J, Berber E (2016) Oncologic results of laparoscopic liver resection for malignant liver tumors. J Surg Oncol 113(2):127–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cai L, Wei F, Yu Y, Yu H, Liang X, Cai X (2016) Laparoscopic right hepatectomy by the caudal approach versus conventional approach: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26(7):540–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Spolverato G, Kim Y, Alexandrescu S, Popescu I, Marques HP, Aldrighetti L, Clark Gamblin T, Miura J, Maithel SK, Squires MH, Pulitano C, Sandroussi C, Mentha G, Bauer TW, Newhook T, Shen F, Poultsides GA, Wallis Marsh J, Pawlik TM (2015) Is hepatic resection for large or multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma justified? Results from a multi-institutional collaboration. Ann Surg Oncol 22(7):2218–2225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Doussot A, Lim C, Gomez Gavara C, Fuks D, Farges O, Regimbeau JM, Azoulay D (2016) Multicentre study of the impact of morbidity on long-term survival following hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 103(13):1887–1894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B (2015) Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 102(7):796–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brown KM, Geller DA (2016) What is the learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 20(5):1065–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mavros MN, Economopoulos KP, Alexiou VG, Pawlik TM (2014) Treatment and prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 149(5):432–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Spolverato G, Kim Y, Ejaz A, Alexandrescu S, Marques H, Aldrighetti L, Gamblin TC, Pulitano C, Bauer TW, Shen F, Sandroussi C, Poultsides G, Maithel SK, Pawlik TM (2015) Conditional probability of long-term survival after liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of 535 patients. JAMA Surg 150(6):538–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Farges O, Fuks D, Boleslawski E, Le Treut YP, Castaing D, Laurent A, Ducerf C, Rivoire M, Bachellier P, Chiche L, Nuzzo G, Regimbeau JM (2011) Influence of surgical margins on outcome in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter study by the AFC-IHCC-2009 study group. Ann Surg 254(5):824–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ogiso S, Nomi T, Araki K, Conrad C, Hatano E, Uemoto S, Fuks D, Gayet B (2015) Laparoscopy-specific surgical concepts for hepatectomy based on the laparoscopic caudal view: a key to reboot surgeons’ minds. Ann Surg Oncol 22(Suppl 3):S327–S333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vigano L, Ferrero A, Amisano M, Russolillo N, Capussotti L (2013) Comparison of laparoscopic and open intraoperative ultrasonography for staging liver tumours. Br J Surg 100(4):535–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Araki K, Conrad C, Ogiso S, Kuwano H, Gayet B (2014) Intraoperative ultrasonography of laparoscopic hepatectomy: key technique for safe liver transection. J Am Coll Surg 218(2):e37–e41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Weber SM, Ribero D, O’Reilly EM, Kokudo N, Miyazaki M, Pawlik TM (2015) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: expert consensus statement. HPB (Oxford) 17(8):669–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bagante F, Gani F, Spolverato G, Xu L, Alexandrescu S, Marques HP, Lamelas J, Aldrighetti L, Gamblin TC, Maithel SK, Pulitano C, Bauer TW, Shen F, Poultsides GA, Marsh JW, Pawlik TM (2015) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: prognosis of patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy. J Am Coll Surg 221(6):1031–1040.e1–e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Nakagawa T, Kamiyama T, Kurauchi N, Matsushita M, Nakanishi K, Kamachi H, Kudo T, Todo S (2005) Number of lymph node metastases is a significant prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg 29(6):728–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. de Jong MC, Nathan H, Sotiropoulos GC, Paul A, Alexandrescu S, Marques H, Pulitano C, Barroso E, Clary BM, Aldrighetti L, Ferrone CR, Zhu AX, Bauer TW, Walters DM, Gamblin TC, Nguyen KT, Turley R, Popescu I, Hubert C, Meyer S, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Gigot JF, Mentha G, Pawlik TM (2011) Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an international multi-institutional analysis of prognostic factors and lymph node assessment. J Clin Oncol 29(23):3140–3145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Li DY, Zhang HB, Yang N, Quan Y, Yang GS (2013) Routine lymph node dissection may be not suitable for all intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients: results of a monocentric series. World J Gastroenterol 19(47):9084–9091

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim DH, Choi DW, Choi SH, Heo JS, Kow AW (2015) Is there a role for systematic hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A review of 17 years of experience in a tertiary institution. Surgery 157(4):666–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yamamoto Y, Turkoglu MA, Aramaki T, Sugiura T, Okamura Y, Ito T, Ashida R, Uemura S, Miyata T, Kato Y, Kakuta Y, Nakanuma Y, Uesaka K (2016) Vascularity of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma on computed tomography is predictive of lymph node metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 23(Suppl 4):485–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Grants from the Public Welfare Project of Technology Application Research of Zhejiang Province (No. 2013C33141).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiujun Cai.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

All authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, F., Lu, C., Cai, L. et al. Can laparoscopic liver resection provide a favorable option for patients with large or multiple intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas?. Surg Endosc 31, 3646–3655 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5399-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5399-3

Keywords

Navigation