Abstract
Background
Acute appendicitis is the most common acute abdomen in general surgery. Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital began an AITS/IRCAD laparoscopic training program in late May 2008. In this retrospective analysis, we surveyed the impact of the AITS training program on surgeons’ preference for open appendectomy (OA) versus laparoscopic appendectomy (LA).
Methods
From January 1, 2004 to July 31, 2009, patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis in Changhua Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital and Chang-Bing Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data, laboratory examinations, surgical methods, hospital stay, and complication rate data were collected and analyzed. The LA rate and effect of surgeons’ preference before and after AITS were compared.
Results
In all, 1,267 patients (58.2% male and 41.8% female; mean age, 36.6 years) were diagnosed with acute appendicitis during this period. Among them, 78.9% of patients had uncomplicated and 21.1% complicated appendicitis; 784 patients (61.9%) underwent OA, and 465 (36.7%) received LA. In 2004, only 8.1% of patients underwent LA, but the number increased rapidly to 90.4% in 2009 (P < 0.001). The average LA rate before AITS was 21%; however, after AITS, the LA rate increased to 84.6% (P < 0.001). The LA rate increased for all surgeons completing the training course, ranging from 16 to 83%. The overall appendectomy complication rate was 8.4%, with no significant difference between OA (9.7%) and LA (6.5%; P = 0.174). Hospital stay was shorter in the LA group (4.05 ± 1.9 days) compared with the OA group (4.55 ± 3.6; P = 0.006).
Conclusions
Attending the laparoscopic training course significantly increased surgeons’ preference for LA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925
Fitz R (1886) Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix, with special reference to its early diagnosis and treatment. Am J Med Sci 92:321–346
McBurney CIV (1894) The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg 20:38–43
Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ (1998) Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med 338:141–146
Aziz O, Athanasiou T, Tekkis PP, Purkayastha S, Haddow J, Malinovski V, Paraskeva P, Darzi A (2006) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in children: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 243:17–27
Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS (1999) A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 42:377–383
Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–256
Sauerland S, Lefering R, Holthausen U, Neuqebauer EA (1998) Laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 383:289–295
Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D (1998) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg 186:545–553
Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B (1999) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9:17–26
Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorqyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448 (discussion 48–50)
Sporn E, Petroski GF, Mancini GJ, Astudillo JA, Miedema BW, Thaler K (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005. J Am Coll Surg 208:179–185
Faiz O, Clark J, Brown T, Bottle A, Antoniou A, Farrands P, Darzi A, Aylin P (2008) Traditional and laparoscopic appendectomy in adults outcomes in English NHS hospitals between 1996 and 2006. Ann Surg 248:800–806
Van Hove C, Hardiman K, Diggs B, Deveney C, Sheppard B (2008) Demographic and socioeconomic trends in the use of laparoscopic appendectomy from 1997 to 2003. Am J Surg 195:580–584
Nguyen NT, Zainabadi K, Mavandadi S, Paya M, Stevens CM, Root J, Wilson SE (2004) Trends in utilization and outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Am J Surg 188:813–820
Paterson HM, Qadan M, de Luca SM, Nixon SJ, Paterson-Brown S (2008) Changing trends in surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 95:363–368
Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Greer M, Schmeler KM, Moroney J, Bodurka DC, Ramirez PT (2008) Laparoscopy training in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs. Gynecol Oncol 111:197–201
Ross HM, Simmang CL, Fleshman JW, Marcello PW (2008) Adoption of laparoscopic colectomy: results and implications of ASCRS hands-on course participation. Surg Innov 15:179–183
Pareek G, Hedican SP, Bishoff JT, Shichman SJ, Wolf JS Jr, Nakada SY (2008) Skills-based laparoscopy training demonstrates long-term transfer of clinical laparoscopic practice: additional follow-up. Urology 72:265–267
Semm K (1983) Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15:59–64
Reynolds W (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 5:89–94
Dolan JP, Diggs BS, Sheppard BC, Hunter JG (2005) Ten-year trend in the national volume of bile duct injuries requiring operative repair. Surg Endosc 19:967–973
Johnston SM, Kidney S, Sweeney KJ, Zaki A, Tanner WA, Keane FV (2003) Changing trends in the management of gallstone disease. Surg Endosc 17:781–786
Kirshtein B, Perry ZH, Mizrahi S, Lantsberg L (2009) Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly patient. World J Surg 33:918–922
Lai HW, Loong CC, Chiu JH, Chau GY, Wu CW, Lui WY (2006) Interval appendectomy after conservative treatment of an appendiceal mass. World J Surg 30:352–357
Lai HW, Loong CC, Tai LC, Wu CW, Lui WY (2006) Incidence and odds ratio of appendicitis as first manifestation of colon cancer: a retrospective analysis of 1,873 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:1693–1696
Lai HW, Loong CC, Wu CW, Lui WY (2005) Watchful waiting versus interval appendectomy for patients who recovered from acute appendicitis with tumor formation: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Chin Med Assoc 68:431–434
Lai HW (2008) Mini review: interval appendectomy after conservative treatment of an appendiceal mass. Formos J Surg 41:135–140
Eriksson S, Granstrom L (1995) Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 82:166–169
Styrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I, Ahlberg G, Haapaniemi S, Neovius G, Rex L, Badume I, Granstrom L (2006) Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 30:1033–1037
Meeks DW, Kao LS (2008) Controversies in appendicitis. Surg Infect 9:553–558
Slim K, Chipponi J (2006) Laparoscopy for every acute appendicitis? Surg Endosc 20:1785–1786
Schick KS, Hüttl TP, Fertmann JM, Hornung H-M, Jauch K-W, Hoffmann AJN (2008) A critical analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy: how experience with 1,400 appendectomies allowed innovative treatment to become standard in a university hospital. World J Surg 32:1406–1413
Disclosures
This study was not funded by any foundation or organization. Asian Institute of Telesurgery (AITS) is a nonprofit training center, and this study was performed by objective researchers, who have no attachments with the industry. There are no conflicts of interest in this study. Dr. H-W Lai, S-H Tseng, Y-T Lee, C-H Hsu, D-A Chou, H-S Wu, and M-H Huang have no conflicts of interests or financial ties to disclosure.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lai, HW., Tseng, SH., Lee, YT. et al. Impact of AITS laparoscopic training center on surgeons’ preference for appendectomy. Surg Endosc 24, 2210–2215 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0930-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0930-4