Skip to main content
Log in

Principles of privileging and credentialing for endoscopy and colonoscopy

  • Consensus document
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Additional reading

  1. Anderson ML, Heigh RI, McCoy GA, Parent K, Muhm JR, McKee GS, Eversman WG, Collins JM (1992) Accuracy of assessment of the extent of examination by experienced colonoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc 38: 560–563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barthel J, Hinojosa T, Shah N (1995) Colonoscope length and procedure efficiency. J Clin Gastroenterol 21: 30–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chak AM, Cooper GS, Blades EW, Canto M, Sivak Jr MV (1996) Prospective assessment of colonoscopic intubation skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 44: 54–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Church JM (1994) Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not? Am J Gastroenterol 89: 556–560

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cosgrove JM, Cohen JR, Wait RB, Margolis IB (1995) Endoscopy training during general surgery residency. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 393–395

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Galandiuk S (1995) A surgical subspecialist enhances general surgical operative experience. Arch Surg 130: 1136–1138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gruber M (1996) Performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy by a clinical nurse specialist. Gastroenterol Nurs 19: 105–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hasseman JH, Lemmel GT, Emad RY, Douglas RK (1997) Failure of colonoscopy to detect colorectal cancer: evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals. Gastrointest Endosc 45: 451–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jentschura D, Raute M, Winter J, Henkel TH, Kraus M, Manegold BC (1994) Complications in endoscopy of the lower gastrointestinal tract (therapy and prognosis). Surg Endosc 8: 672–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marshall JB (1995) Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 42: 287–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parry BR, Williams SM (1991) Competency and the colonoscopist: a learning curve. Aust NZJ Surg 61: 419–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rai S, Moran MR, Rai AM (1996) Are colonoscopies performed by subspecialists more expensive? (abstract). Dis Colon Rectum 39:A2

    Google Scholar 

  13. Saad JA, Pirie P, Sprafka JM (1994) Relationships between flexible sigmoidoscopy training during residency and subsequent sigmoidoscopy performance in practice. Fam Med 26: 250–253

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wexner SD, Garbus JE, Singh JJ, the SAGES Colonoscopy Outcomes Study Group (2001) A prospective analysis of 13,580 colonoscopies: reevaluation of credentialing guidelines. Surg Endosc 15: 251–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wexner SD, Forde KA, Sellers G, Geron N, Lopes A, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ (1998) How well do surgeons perform colonoscopy? Surg Endosc 12: 1410–1414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wigton RS, Blank LL, Monsour H, Nicolas JA (1990) Procedural skills of practicing gastroenterologists: a national survey of 700 members of the American College of Physicians. Ann Int Med 113: 540–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Parry BR, Williams SM (1991) Competency and the colonoscopist: a learning curve. Aust NZJ Surg 61: 419–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cass OW, Freeman ML, Cohen J, Zuckerman G, Watkins J, Nord J, Locke GR, Jensen D, Diehl D, Cerulli M, Lyche K, Fennerty M, Edmundowicz S, Etzkorn K, AI-Kawas F, Cave D, Lehman G, ACES Study Group (1993) Acquisition of competency in endoscopic skills (ACES) during training: a multicenter study (abstract). Gastrointest Endosc 43:308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cass OW, Freeman ML, Peine CJ, Zera R, Onstad GR (1993) Objective evaluation of endoscopic skills during training. Ann Intern Med 118: 40–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Galandiuk S, Ahmad P (1998) Impact of sedation and resident teaching on complications of colonoscopy. Dis Surg 15: 60–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for gastrointestinal endoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 48: 679-682

  2. Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 49: 845-853

  3. Statement on role of short courses in endoscopic training gastrointest Endosc 50: 913-914

  4. Alternative pathways to training in gastrointestinal endoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 43: 658-660

  5. Proctoring for hospital endoscopy privileges Gastrointest Endosc 50: 901-905

  6. Renewal of Endoscopic privileges Gastrointest Endosc 49: 823-825

  7. Methods of privileging for new technology in gastrointestinal endoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 50: 899-900

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This consensus document was jointly prepared and endorsed by SAGES, ASGE, and ASCRS and simultaneously published in Diseases of the Colon and Rectum and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wexner, S., Eisen, G. & Simmang, C. Principles of privileging and credentialing for endoscopy and colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 16, 367–369 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-0073-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-0073-8

Keywords

Navigation