Skip to main content
Log in

Ma–Schlenker c-Octahedra in the 2-Sphere

  • Published:
Discrete & Computational Geometry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present constructions inspired by the Ma–Schlenker example of “Non-rigidity of spherical inversive distance circle packings” (Discrete Comput Geom 47(3):610–617, 2012). In contrast to the use in Ma and Schlenker (2012) of an infinitesimally flexible Euclidean polyhedron, embeddings in de Sitter space, and Pogorelov maps, our elementary constructions use only the inversive geometry of the 2-sphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In both Luo [4] and Ma–Schlenker [5] there is a typo in the expression for the spherical formula for inversive distance. They report the negative of this formula. A quick 2nd order Taylor approximation shows that this formula reduces to Expression (1.1) in the limit as the arguments of the sines and cosines approach zero.

  2. Any circle in \({\mathbb {S}}^{2}\) bounds two distinct disks. Without explicitly stating so, we always assume that one of these has been chosen as a companion disk. The center and radius of a circle in \({\mathbb {S}}^{2}\) are the center and radius of its companion disk. The ambiguity should cause no confusion.

  3. It is in no way obvious that formulæ (1.1) and (1.2) are Möbius invariants of circle pairs. There is a not so well-known development of inversive distance, which applies equally in spherical, Euclidean, and hyperbolic geometry, that uses the cross-ratio of the four points of intersection of \(C_{1}\) and \(C_{2}\) with a common orthogonal circle. It is computationally less friendly than (1.1) and (1.2), but has the theoretical advantage of being manifestly Möbius-invariant. See [1].

  4. By an application of (3.14).

References

  1. Bowers, P.L., Hurdal, M.K.: Planar conformal mappings of piecewise flat surfaces. In: Hege, H.-C., Polthier, K. (eds.) Visualization and Mathematics III, Chapter 1, pp. 3–34. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowers, P.L., Stephenson, K.: Uniformizing dessins and Belyĭ maps via circle packing. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 170(805), 1–97 (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo, R.: Local rigidity of inversive distance circle packing. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 363(9), 4757–4776 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Luo, F.: Rigidity of polyhedral surfaces, III. Geom. Topol. 15(4), 2299–2319 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma, J., Schlenker, J.-M.: Non-rigidity of spherical inversive distance circle packings. Discrete Comput. Geom. 47(3), 610–617 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John C.  Bowers.

Additional information

Editor in Charge: Kenneth Clarkson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

 Bowers, J.C.,  Bowers, P.L. Ma–Schlenker c-Octahedra in the 2-Sphere. Discrete Comput Geom 60, 9–26 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-017-9928-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00454-017-9928-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation