Skip to main content
Log in

Study on the mechanism of anaerobic fluidized bed microbial fuel cell for coal chemical wastewater treatment

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The coal chemical wastewater (CCW) was treated by anaerobic fluidized bed microbial fuel cell (AFB-MFC) with macroporous adsorptive resin (MAR) as fluidized particle. Isosteric heat calculation and molecular dynamics simulation (MDS) have been performed to study the interaction between organics of CCW and MAR. The isosteric heat of MAR to m-cresol was the largest at 65.4961 kJ/mol, followed by phenol. Similarly, the diffusion coefficient of m-cresol on MAR was the largest, which was 0.04350 Å2/ps, and the results were verified by the kinetic adsorption experiments. Microbial community analysis showed that the dominant bacteria in activated sludge of MFC fed with CCW were acinetobacter, aeromonas, pseudomonas and sulfurospirillum. The synergistic cooperation of bacteria contributed to improving CCW degradation and the power generation of MFC. Headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS–GC–MS) was used to detect intermediate of organics in CCW. It was proved that the intermediate of m-cresol degradation was 4-methyl-2-pentanone and acetic acid, and the intermediate of phenol degradation included cyclohexanone, hydroxyhexanedither and hydroxyacetic acid. Combined with the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) analysis results of organic matter obtained by molecular simulation, the degradation pathway of organic matter in CCW was predicted. The energy of organics degradation pathway was analyzed by Materials Studio (MS) software, and the control step of organics degradation was determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu C, Chen X-X, Zhang J, Zhou H-Z, Zhang L, Guo Y-K (2018) Advanced treatment of bio-treated coal chemical wastewater by a novel combination of microbubble catalytic ozonation and biological process. Sep Purif Technol 197:295–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang Y, Hou X, Liu S, Ni J (2016) Correspondence analysis of bio-refractory compounds degradation and microbiological community distribution in anaerobic filter for coking wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 304:864–872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu X, Wei C, Wu H, Jiang Z, Xu R (2015) Improvement of biodegradability for coking wastewater by selective adsorption of hydrophobic organic pollutants. Sep Purif Technol 151:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shi S, Qu Y, Ma Q, Zhang X, Zhou J, Ma F (2015) Performance and microbial community dynamics in bioaugmented aerated filter reactor treating with coking wastewater. Biores Technol 190:159–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Niu Y, Liu X, Chang G, Guo Q (2020) Treatment of isopropanol wastewater in an anaerobic fluidized bed microbial fuel cell filled with macroporous adsorptive resin as multifunctional biocarrier. Sci Total Environ 719:137495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Yaqoob AA, Ibrahim MNM, Rodríguez-Couto S (2020) Development and modification of materials to build cost-effective anodes for microbial fuel cells (MFCs): an overview. Biochem Eng J 164:107779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kong W, Guo Q, Wang X, Yue X (2011) Electricity generation from wastewater using an anaerobic fluidized bed microbial fuel cell. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:12225–12232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu XM, Niu YJ, Wang LY, Guo QJ (2020) Treatment of m-cresol wastewater in an anaerobic fluidized bed microbial fuel cell equipped with different modified carbon cloth cathodes. Energy Fuels 34:10059–10066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Palanisamy G, Jung H-Y, Sadhasivam T, Kurkuri MD, Kim SC, Roh S-H (2019) A comprehensive review on microbial fuel cell technologies: processes, utilization, and advanced developments in electrodes and membranes. J Clean Prod 221:598–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen DT, Taguchi K (2019) Enhancing the performance of E. coli-powered MFCs by using porous 3D anodes based on coconut activated carbon. Biochem Eng J 151:107357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Benmakhlouf N, Azzouz S, Elcafsi A (2020) The determination of isosteric heats of sorption of leather: experimental and mathematical investigations. Arab J Chem 13:4286–4293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan W, Chakraborty A, Leong KC (2018) Theoretical and experimental investigations of isosteric heats for water adsorption on silica gel surfaces. Appl Therm Eng 141:134–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang R, Wang J, Song Q (2020) The effect of Na+ and H2O on structural and mechanical properties of coal gangue-based geopolymer: molecular dynamics simulation and experimental study. Constr Build Mater 268:121081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu Y, Huang L, Shan M, Sang J, Li Y, Jia L, Wang N, Wang S, Shao S, Liu F, Lu F (2019) Enhancing the activity and thermostability of Streptomyces mobaraensis transglutaminase by directed evolution and molecular dynamics simulation. Biochem Eng J 151:107333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen Y, Li J, Wang F, Yang H, Liu L (2020) Adsorption of tetracyclines onto polyethylene microplastics: a combined study of experiment and molecular dynamics simulation. Chemosphere 265:129133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo F, Zhou M, Xu J, Fein JB, Yu Q, Wang Y, Huang Q, Rong X (2021) Glyphosate adsorption onto kaolinite and kaolinite-humic acid composites: experimental and molecular dynamics studies. Chemosphere 263:127979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghahghaey Z, Hekmati M, Darvish Ganji M (2020) Theoretical investigation of phenol adsorption on functionalized graphene using DFT calculations for effective removal of organic contaminants from wastewater. J Mol Liq 324:114777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Billeter SR, Curioni A, Andreoni W (2003) Efficient linear scaling geometry optimization and transition-state search for direct wavefunction optimization schemes in density functional theory using a plane-wave basis. Comput Mater Sci 27:437–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee E, Rout PR, Kyun Y, Bae J (2020) Process optimization and energy analysis of vacuum degasifier systems for the simultaneous removal of dissolved methane and hydrogen sulfide from anaerobically treated wastewater. Water Res 182:115965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin M, Wang F, Zhu Y (2020) Modeled structure-based computational redesign of a glycosyltransferase for the synthesis of rebaudioside D from rebaudioside A. Biochem Eng J 159:107626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu XM, Wu JJ, Guo QJ (2017) Analysis of organic compounds’ degradation and electricity generation in anaerobic fluidized bed microbial fuel cell for coking wastewater treatment. Environ Technol 38:3115–3121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shi W, Cang H, Xu W, Shao R, Yan X, Liu C-W, Chen C-L (2020) Dynamic behavior in lithium ion/graphene/propylene carbonate electrolyte systems through molecular dynamics simulation. Comput Mater Sci 174:109496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuan M, Gao M, Shi Q, Dong J (2020) Understanding the characteristics of water adsorption in zeolitic imidazolate framework-derived porous carbon materials. Chem Eng J 379:122412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu Y, Lu W, Wang H, Gao X, Huang Q (2019) Improved impact assessment of odorous compounds from landfills using Monte Carlo simulation. Sci Total Environ 648:805–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhuang S, Chen R, Liu Y, Wang J (2020) Magnetic COFs for the adsorptive removal of diclofenac and sulfamethazine from aqueous solution: adsorption kinetics, isotherms study and DFT calculation. J Hazard Mater 385:121596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ghasemi A, Asgarpour Khansary M, Marjani A, Shirazian S (2017) Using quantum chemical modeling and calculations for evaluation of cellulose potential for estrogen micropollutants removal from water effluents. Chemosphere 178:411–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Park Y, Cho H, Yu J, Min B, Kim HS, Kim BG, Lee T (2017) Response of microbial community structure to pre-acclimation strategies in microbial fuel cells for domestic wastewater treatment. Biores Technol 233:176–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Deng Q, Su C, Lu X, Chen W, Guan X, Chen S, Chen M (2020) Performance and functional microbial communities of denitrification process of a novel MFC-granular sludge coupling system. Biores Technol 306:123173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Han JL, Liu Y, Chang CT, Chen BY, Chen WM, Xu HZ (2011) Exploring characteristics of bioelectricity generation and dye decolorization of mixed and pure bacterial cultures from wine-bearing wastewater treatment. Biodegradation 22:321–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu XW, Li WW, Yu HQ (2014) Cathodic catalysts in bioelectrochemical systems for energy recovery from wastewater. Chem Soc Rev 43:7718–7745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Toh H, Sharma VK, Oshima K, Kondo S, Hattori M, Ward FB, Free A, Taylor TD (2011) Complete genome sequences of arcobacter butzleri ED-1 and Arcobacter sp. Strain L, both isolated from a microbial fuel cell. J Bacteriol 193:6411–6412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Michaelidou U, Ter Heijne A, Euverink GJW, Hamelers HVM, Stams AJM, Geelhoed JS (2011) Microbial communities and electrochemical performance of titanium-based anodic electrodes in a microbial fuel cell. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:1069–1075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Raghavulu SV, Modestra JA, Amulya K, Reddy CN, Venkata Mohan S (2013) Relative effect of bioaugmentation with electrochemically active and non-active bacteria on bioelectrogenesis in microbial fuel cell. Biores Technol 146:696–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fuchs G (2010) Anaerobic metabolism of aromatic compounds. Eur J Biochem 1125:82–99

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hassan H, Jin B, Donner E, Vasileiadis S, Saint C, Dai S (2018) Microbial community and bioelectrochemical activities in MFC for degrading phenol and producing electricity: microbial consortia could make differences. Chem Eng J 332:647–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Harayama S, Rekik M (1989) Bacterial aromatic ring-cleavage enzymes are classified into two different gene families. J Biol Chem 264:15328–15333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sanakis Y, Mamma D, Christakopoulos P, Stamatis H (2003) Catechol 1,2-dioxygenase from Pseudomonas putida in organic media–an electron paramagnetic resonance study. Int J Biol Macromol 33:101–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kim SI, Leem SH, Choi JS, Chung YH, Kim S, Park YM, Park YK, Lee YN, Ha KS (1997) Cloning and characterization of two catA genes in Acinetobacter lwoffii K24. J Bacteriol 179:5226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Foundation of State Key Laboratory of High-efficiency Utilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering (2021-K20), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21706141).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinmin Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 1456 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, Y., Liu, X., Wang, L. et al. Study on the mechanism of anaerobic fluidized bed microbial fuel cell for coal chemical wastewater treatment. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 45, 481–492 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-021-02672-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-021-02672-x

Keywords

Navigation