Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of fluorimetric pH sensors for bioprocess monitoring at low pH

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optical chemical sensors are the standard for pH monitoring in small-scale bioreactors such as microtiter plates, shaking flasks or other single-use bioreactors. The dynamic pH range of the so far commercially available fluorescent pH sensors applied in small-scale bioreactors is restricted to pH monitoring around neutral pH, although many fermentation processes are performed at pH < 6 on industrial scale. Thus, two new prototype acidic fluorescence pH sensors immobilized in single-use stirred-tank bioreactors, one with excitation at 470 nm and emission at 550 nm (sensor 470/550) and the other with excitation at 505 nm and emission at 600 nm (sensor 505/600), were characterized with respect to dynamic ranges and operational stability in representative fermentation media. Best resolution and dynamic range was observed with pH sensor 505/600 in mineral medium (dynamic range of 3.9 < pH < 7.2). Applying the same pH sensors to complex medium results in a drastic reduction of resolution and dynamic ranges. Yeast extract in complex medium was found to cause background fluorescence at the sensors’ operating wavelength combinations. Optical isolation of the sensor by adding a black colored polymer layer above the sensor spot and fixing an aperture made of adhesive photoresistant foil between the fluorescence reader and the transparent bottom of the polystyrene reactors enabled full re-establishment of the sensor’s characteristics. Reliability and operational stability of sensor 505/600 was shown by online pH monitoring (4.5 < pH < 5.8) of parallel anaerobic batch fermentations of Clostridium acetobutylicum for the production of acetone, butanol and ethanol (ABE) with offline pH measurements with a standard glass electrode as reference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huber R, Ritter D, Hering T, Hillmer A-K, Kensy F, Müller C, Wang L, Büchs J (2009) Robo-Lector—a novel platform for automated high-throughput cultivations in microtiter plates with high information content. Microb Cell Fact 8:42. doi:10.1186/1475-2859-8-42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hortsch R, Weuster-Botz D (2010) Milliliter-scale stirred tank reactors for the cultivation of microorganisms. In Laskin AI, Sariaslani S and Gadd GM (Eds): Advances in Applied Microbiology, Vol. 73, Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, pp 61–82

  3. Kirk T, Szita N (2012) Oxygen transfer characteristics of miniaturized bioreactor systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 110:1005–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harms P, Kostov Y, Rao G (2002) Bioprocess monitoring. Curr Op Biotechnol 13:124–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wencel D, Abel T, McDonagh C (2014) optical chemical pH sensors. Anal Chem 86:15–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klimant I, Huber C, Liebsch G, Wolfbeis OS (2001): Dual lifetime referencing (DLR)—a new scheme for converting fluorescence intensity into a frequency-domain or time-domain information. In: Valeur, Bernard und Brochon, Jean-Claude, (eds.) New trends in fluorescence spectroscopy: applications to chemical and life sciences. Springer Series on Fluorescence, 1 (13). Springer, Berlin, 257-274

  7. Liebsch G, Klimant I, Krause C, Wolfbeis OS (2001) Fluorescent imaging of pH with optical sensors using time domain dual lifetime referencing. Anal Chem 73:4354–4363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arain A, John GT, Krause C, Gerlach J, Wolfbeis OS, Klimant I (2006) Characterization of microtiterplates with integrated optical sensors for oxygen and pH, and their applications to enzyme activity screening, respirometry, and toxicological assays. Sens Actuat B 113:639–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Walker GM (2000) Yeast physiology and biotechnology. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 144–149

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knorr B, Schlieker H, Hohmann H-P, Weuster-Botz D (2007) Scale-down and parallel operation of the riboflavin production process with Bacillus subtilis. Biochem Eng J 33:263–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Faust G, Janzen N, Bendig C, Römer L, Kaufmann K, Weuster-Botz D (2014) Feeding strategies enhance high cell density cultivation and protein expression in milliliter-scale bioreactors. Biotechnol J 9:1293–1303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kusterer A, Krause C, Kaufmann K, Arnold M, Weuster-Botz D (2008) Fully automated single-use stirred-tank bioreactors for parallel microbial cultivations. Bioproc Biosys Eng 31:207–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hortsch R, Krispin H, Weuster-Botz D (2011) Process performance of parallel bioreactors for batch cultivation of Streptomyces tendae. Bioproc Biosys Eng 34:297–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bendig C, Weuster-Botz D (2013) Reaction engineering analysis of cellulase production with Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 with intermittent substrate supply. Bioproc Biosys Eng 36:893–900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Riedlberger P, Brüning S, Weuster-Botz D (2013) Characterization of stirrers for screening studies of enzymatic biomass hydrolyses on a milliliter-scale. Bioproc Biosys Eng 36:927–935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Puskeiler R, Kaufmann K, Weuster-Botz D (2005) Development, parallelization and automation of a gas-inducing milliliter-scale bioreactor for high-throughput bioprocess design (HTBD). Biotechnol Bioeng 89:512–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Weuster-Botz D, Puskeiler R, Kusterer A, Kaufmann K, John G, Arnold M (2005) Methods and milliliter scale devices for high- throughput bioprocess design. Bioproc Biosys Eng 28:109–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt M, Weuster-Botz D (2012) Reaction engineering studies of acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation with Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol J 7:656–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Klimant I (2003) Patent US 6,602,716 B1

  20. Monot F, Martin JR, Petitdemange H, Gay R (1982) Acetone and butanol production by Clostridium acetobutylicum in a synthetic medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:1318–1324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Korz DJ, Rinas U, Hellmuth K, Sanders EA, Deckwer WD (1995) Simple fed-batch technique for high cell density cultivation of Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol 39:59–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs and Media, Energy and Technology and the companies PreSens Precision Sensing GmbH, Regensburg, Germany and 2mag AG, Munich, Germany. Assistance from Michael Geitner and software support by Dirk Hebel (Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the support of Nils H. Janzen and Michael Schmidt by the TUM Graduate School at the Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nils H. Janzen or Dirk Weuster-Botz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Janzen, N.H., Schmidt, M., Krause, C. et al. Evaluation of fluorimetric pH sensors for bioprocess monitoring at low pH. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38, 1685–1692 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1409-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-015-1409-4

Keywords

Navigation