Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hydrogen production from biodiesel byproduct by immobilized Enterobacter aerogenes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent rapid growth of the biodiesel industry has generated a significant amount of glycerol as a byproduct. As a result, the price of glycerol is currently relatively low, making it an attractive starting material for the production of chemicals with higher values. Crude glycerol can be directly converted through microbial fermentation into various chemicals such as hydrogen. In this study, we optimized immobilization of a facultative hydrogen producing microorganism, Enterobacter aerogenes, with the goal of developing biocatalysts that was appropriate for the continuous hydrogen production from glycerol. Several carriers were tested and agar was found to be the most effective. In addition, it was clearly shown that variables such as the carrier content and cell loading should be controlled for the immobilization of biocatalysts with high hydrogen productivity, stability, and reusability. After optimization of these variables, we were able to obtain reusable biocatalysts that could directly convert the byproduct stream from biodiesel processes into hydrogen in continuous processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adhikari S, Sandun D, Fernando S, Agus H (2009) Hydrogen production from glycerol: an update. Energy Convers Manag 50:2600–2604

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Patrick H, Dipankar G (2009) Advances in fermentative bio-hydrogen production; the way forward. Trends Biotechnol 27:287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ewan BCR, Allen RWK (2005) A figure of merit assessment of the routes to hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 30:809–819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tullo A (2006) Firms advance chemicals from renewable resources. Chem Eng News 85:14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pagliaro M, Ciriminna R, Kimura H, Rossi M, Pina CD (2007) From glycerol to valueadded products. Angew Chem Int 46:4434–4440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Claude S (1999) Research of new outlets for glycerol. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 101:101–104

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seifert K, Waligorska M, Wojtowski M, Laniecki M (2009) Hydrogen generation from glycerol in bath fermentation process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:3671–3678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jong Hwan S, Tai Hyun P (2006) Biological hydrogen production processes. Korean Chem Eng Res 44:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  9. Patrick CH (2009) Fermentative hydrogen production: principles, progress, and prognosis. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:7379–7389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morimoto M, Atsuko M (2004) Biological production of hydrogen from glucose by natural anaerobic microflora. Int J Hydrogen Energy 29:709–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sergei AM, Jared A, Waldron B (2011) Bioreactor for glycerol conversion into H2 by bacterium Enterobacter aerogenes. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:262–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guillaume SP, Patrick CH (2009) High yield conversion of a crude glycerol fraction from biodiesel production to hydrogen by photofermentation. Bioresour Technol 100:3513–3517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vassilev N, Toro M, Vassileva M (1997) Rock phosphate solubilization by immobilized cells of Enterobacter sp. in fermentation and soil conditions. Bioresour Technol 61:29–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yokoi H, Ohkawara T (1995) Characteristics of hydrogen production by aciduric Enterobacter aerogenes strain HO-39. J Ferment Bioeng 80:481–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ito T, Ankashimada Y (2005) Hydrogen and ethanol production from glycerol-containing wastes discharged after biodiesel manufacturing process. J Biosci Bioeng 100:260–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Malvessi E, Carra S, Mauricio MDS, Marco AZA (2010) Effect of substrate concentration, pH and temperature on the activity of the complex glucose-fructose oxidoreductase/glucono-∂-lactonase present in calcium alginate-immobilized Zymomonas mobilis cells. Biochem Eng J 51:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sonomoto K, Chinachoti N, Naoyuki E, Ayaaki I (2000) Biosynthetic production of nisin Z by immobilized Lactococcus lactis IO-1. J Mol Catal B Enzym 10:325–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sunhee P (1987) Hydrogen production by Rhodopseudomonas spp. immobilized. Ewhas Womans University, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  19. Para G, Baratti J (1988) Synthesis of l-Dopa by Escherichia intermedia cells immobilized in a carrageenan gel. Enzym Microb Technol 10:729–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Castillo E, Rodriguez M, Casas L, Quintero R, Ldpez-Munguia A (1991) Design of two immobilized cell catalysts by entrapment on gelatin: internal diffusion aspects. Enzym Microb Technol 13:127–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kennedy JF, Kalogerakis B, Cabral JMS (1984) Surface immobilization and entrapping of enzymes on glutaraldehyde crosslinked gelatin particles. Enzym Microb Technol 6:127–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Champagne PP, Ramsay JA (2010) Dye decolorization and detoxification by laccase immobilized on porous glass beads. Bioresour Technol 101:2230–2235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Emine K, Sule P (2009) Immobilization of apricot pectinesterase (Prunus armeniaca L.) on porous glass beads and its characterization. J Mol Catal B Enzym 56:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rebecca C, Hany A, Isabelle G, Rahul B, Mansel G, Michael AB (2010) Immobilization of bacteriophages on modified silica particles. J Biomater 31:1904–1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ji Hye J, Dae Sung L, Donghee P, Woo-Seok C, Jong P (2008) Optimization of key process variables for enhanced hydrogen production by Enterobacter aerogenes using statistical methods. Bioresour Technol 99:2061–2066

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yandi D, Abhishek M, Ramon G (2006) Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol by Escherichia coli: a new platform for metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng 10:821–829

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sung Hun P, Kyn Ho K, Eui-Young K (2008) Analysis of hydrogen production by mixed culture with Enterobacter aerogenes and Clostridium butyridium. Korean J Biotechnol Bioeng 3:216–218

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mike R, Francesco R, Françoise Q (2011) Natural materials with high surface area. Physisorption methods for the characterization of the texture and surface of polysaccharide aerogels. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 140:9–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Eco-Technopia 21 project (2009-03002-002-0) of Ministry of Environment, Korea and by the Basic Research Program of Korea Institute of Industrial Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jeewon Lee or Sangyong Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, J., Lee, D., Cho, J. et al. Hydrogen production from biodiesel byproduct by immobilized Enterobacter aerogenes . Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 35, 151–157 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0593-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0593-0

Keywords

Navigation