Skip to main content
Log in

The coalescence and organization of lahars at Semeru volcano, Indonesia

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Volcanology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present multi-parameter geophysical measurements of rainfall-induced lahars at Semeru Volcano, East Java, using two observation sites 510 m apart, 11.5 km from the summit. Our study site in the Curah Lengkong channel is composed of a 30-m wide box-valley, with a base of gravel and lava bedrock, representing an ideal geometry for high density measurements of active lahars. Instrumentation included pore-pressure sensors (stage), a broad-band seismograph (arrival times, vibrational energy, and turbulence), video footage, and direct bucket sampling. A total of 8 rainfall-induced lahars were recorded, with durations of 1–3 h, heights 0.5–2 m, and peak velocities 3–6 m/s. Flow types ranged from dilute to dense hyperconcentrated flows. These recorded flows were commonly composed of partly coalesced, discrete and unsteady gravity current packets, represented by multiple peaks within each lahar. These packets most likely originate from multiple lahar sources, and can be traced between instrument sites. Those with the highest concentrations and greatest wetted areas were often located mid-lahar at our measured reach, accelerating towards the flow front. As these lahars travel downstream, the individual packets thus coalesce and the flow develops a more organised structure. Observations of different degrees of coalescence between these discrete flow packets illustrate that a single mature debris flow may have formed from multiple dynamically independent lahars, each with different origins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arattano M, Moia F (1999) Monitoring the propagation of a debris flow along a torrent. Hydrol Sci J 44:811–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Arattano M, Marchi L (2008) Systems and sensors for debris-flow monitoring and warning. Sensors 8:2436–2452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beverage J, Culbertson J (1964) Hyperconcentrations of suspended sediment. Am Soc Civ Eng 90:117–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrivick JL, Manville V, Cronin SJ (2008) A fluid dynamics approach to modelling the 18th March 2007 lahar at Mt. Ruapehu, New Zealand. Bull Volcanol 71:153–169. doi:10.1007/s00445-008-0213-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole S, Cronin S, Sherburn S, Manville V (2009) Seismic signals of snow- slurry lahars in motion: 25 Sept. 2007, Mt. Ruapehu, N.Z. Geophys Res Lett 36:L09405. doi:10.1029/2009GL038030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coussot P, Meunier M (1996) Recognition, classification and mechanical description of debris flows. Earth Sci Rev 40:209–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin SJ, Neall VE, Lecointre JA, Palmer AS (1997) Changes in Whangaehu River lahar characteristics during the 1995 eruption sequence, Ruapehu volcano, N.Z. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 76:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin SJ, Neall VE, Lecointre JA, Palmer AS (1999) Dynamic interactions between lahars and stream flow: a case study from Ruapehu volcano, N.Z. Geol Soc Am Bull 111:28–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle EE, Cronin SJ, Cole SE, Thouret J-C (2009) The challenges of incorporating temporal and spatial changes into numerical models of lahars. In: Proceedings of the 18th World International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, Cairns, 13–17 July 2009

  • Dumaisnil C, Thouret J-C, Chambon G, Doyle EE, Cronin SJ (2010) Distinctive hydraulic characteristics and a frictional model apply to lahar flows at Semeru volcano (Indonesia). Earth Surf Proc Landf. doi:10.1002/esp.2003

  • Fagents SA, Baloga SM (2006) Toward a model for the bulking and debulking of lahars. J Geophys Res 111:B10201. doi:10.1029/2005JB003986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CJ, Shieh CL, Yin HY (2004) Laboratory study of the underground sound generated by debris flows. J Geophys Res 109:F01008. doi:10.1029/2003JF000048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C-J, Yin H-Y, Chen C-Y, Yeh C-H, Wang C-L (2007) Ground vibrations produced by rock motions and debris flows. J Geophys Res 112:F02014. doi:10.1029/2005JF000437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hürlimann M, Rickenmann D, Graf C (2003) Field and monitoring data of debris-flow events in the Swiss Alps. Can Geotech J 40:161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35:245–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Denlinger RP (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain. 1. Coulomb mixture theory. J Geophys Res 106:537–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson RM, Reid ME, LaHusen RG (1997) Debris-flow mobilization from landslides. Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 25:85–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne S, Suwa H (2004) Contrasts between debris flows, hyperconcentrated flows and stream flows at a channel of Mt. Semeru, East Java, Indonesia. Geomorphology 61:41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne F, Thouret J-C, Voight B, Young K, La Husen R, Marso J, Suwa H, Sumaryono A, Sayudi DS, Dejean M (2000) Instrumental lahar monitoring at Merapi volcano. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 100:457–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavigne F, Tirel A, Le Froch D, Veyrat-Charvillon S (2003) A real-time assessment of lahar dynamics and sediment load based on video-camera recording at Semeru volcano, Indonesia. In: Rickenman D, Chen C (eds) Debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction and assessment, vol 2. Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 871–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedonio G, Pareschi M (1992) Numerical simulation of some lahars from Mount St. Helens. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 54:65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major JJ (1997) Depositional processes in large-scale debris-flow experiments. J Geol 105:345–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manville V, Cronin SJ (2007) Breakout lahar from New Zealand’s Crater Lake. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 88(43):441–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchi L, Arattano M, Deganutti AM (2002) Ten years of debris-flow monitoring in the Moscardo Torrent (Italian Alps). Geomorphology 46:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcial S, Melosantos AA, Hadley KC, LaHusen RG, Marso JN (1996) Instrumental lahar monitoring at Mt. Pinatubo. In: Newhall CG, Punongbayan RS (eds) Fire and mud: eruptions and lahars of Mt. Pinatubo, Philippines. Seattle, University of Washington Press, pp 1015–1022

    Google Scholar 

  • Massimo A (2000) On debris flow front evolution along a torrent. Phys Chem Earth (B) 25:733–740

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien JS (1999) FLO-2D users manual, version 99.2, pp 157

  • Okuda S, Suwa K, Okunishi K, Yokoyama K, Ogawa K, Hamana S (1979) Synthetic observation of debris flows (part 5). Annuals of Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, 22:175–204. Japanese with English Abstract.

  • Pierson TC (2005) Hyperconcentrated flow transition process between water flow and debris flow. In: Jakob M, Hungr O (eds) Debris flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 159–196

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rickenmann D, McArdel BW (2007) Continuous measurement of sediment transport in the Erlenbach stream using piezoelectric bedload impact sensors. Earth Surf Proc Landf 32:1362–1378. doi:10.1002/esp.1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling SP (1998) LAHARZ, GIS programs for automated mapping of lahar-inundation hazard zones. US Geol Surv Open-File Rep 98–638:1–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwa H, Yamakoshi T, Sato K (2000) Relationship between debris-flow discharge and ground vibration. In: Wieczorek G, Naeser N (eds) Debris-flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction and assessment. Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 311–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (ed) (2007) Debris flow: mechanics, prediction and countermeasures. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Witham C (2005) Volcanic disasters and incidents: A new database. J Volcanol Geotherm Res. 148:191–233. doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2005.04.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanuttigh B, Lamberti A (2007) Instability and surge development in debris flows. Rev Geophys 45:RG3006. doi:10.1029/2005RG000175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobin VM, Plascencia I, Reyes G, Navarro C (2009) The characteristics of seismic signals produced by lahars and pyroclastic flows: Volcán de Colima, México. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 179:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Céline Dumaisnil, Yves Bru, the Lengkong villagers, Mahjum and Latif Usman for field assistance, Gert Lube for helpful discussions and Jenny Barclay, Chris Waythomas, and an anonymous journal reviewer for helpful comments to improve our presentation. EED and SJC are supported by the Marsden Fund (MAUX0512) and the NZ FRST (MAUX0401). SEC thanks the Commonwealth Scholarship Scheme and Massey University Graduate Research School. JCT was supported by the French-Indonesian VELI (Volcanisme Explosif Laboratoire Indonésien) research and exchange programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. E. Doyle.

Additional information

Editorial responsibilty: H. Delgado

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doyle, E.E., Cronin, S.J., Cole, S.E. et al. The coalescence and organization of lahars at Semeru volcano, Indonesia. Bull Volcanol 72, 961–970 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-010-0381-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-010-0381-8

Keywords

Navigation