Skip to main content
Log in

Further evaluation in field tests of the activity of three anthelmintics (fenbendazole, oxibendazole, and pyrantel pamoate) against the ascarid Parascaris equorum in horse foals on eight farms in Central Kentucky (2009–2010)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Parasitology Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The activity of three anthelmintics (fenbendazole–FBZ; oxibendazole–OBZ; and pyrantel pamoate–PRT) was ascertained against the ascarid Parascaris equorum in horse foals on eight farms in Central Kentucky (2009–2010) in field tests. A total of 316 foals were treated, and 168 (53.2%) were passing ascarid eggs on the day of treatment. Evaluation of drug efficacy was determined qualitatively by comparing the number of foals passing ascarid eggs in their feces before and after treatment. The main purpose was to obtain data on current activity of these compounds against ascarids. Additionally, the objective was to compare these findings with those from earlier data on the efficacy of these three compounds on nematodes in foals in this geographical area. Efficacies (average) for the foals ranged for FBZ (10 mg/kg) from 50% to 100% (80%), for OBZ (10 mg/kg) from 75% to 100% (97%), and for PRT at 1× (6.6 mg base/kg) from 0% to 71% (2%) and at 2× (13.2 mg base/kg) 0% to 0% (0%). Although the efficacy varied among the drugs, combined data for all farms indicated a significant reduction of ascarid infections for FBZ (p < 0.0001) and OBZ (p < 0.0001) but not for PRT (p = 0.0953).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Boersema JH, Eykser M, Nas JWM (2002) Apparent resistance of Parascaris equorum to macrocyclic lactones. Vet Rec 150:279–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton HM (1986) Ascarids. Recent advances. In: Herd RP (ed) Veterinary clinics of North America (Equine Practice), vol. 2. Sanders, Philadelphia, pp 313–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton HM, Duncan JL (1977) Experimental Parascaris equorum infection of foals. Res Vet Sci 23:109–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craig TM, Diamond PL, Ferwerda NS, Thompson JA (2007) Evidence of ivermectin resistance by Parascaris equorum on a Texas horse farm. J Equine Vet Sci 27:67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drudge JH, Lyons ET (1983) Ascariasis. In: Robinson NE (ed) Current therapy in equine medicine. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 262–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ǿ, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4 (1): 9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm. Accessed 19 January 2011

  • Hearn FP, Peregrine AS (2003) Identification of foals infected with Parascaris equorum apparently resistant to ivermectin. J Am Vet Med Assoc 223:482–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RM, Reinemeyer CR, Slocombe O, Murray MJ (2006) Confirmation of ivermectin resistance in a purportedly resistant Canadian isolate of Parascaris equorum in foals. Proc Am Assoc Vet Parasitol 51:69

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons ET, Tolliver SC (2009) Some historic aspects of small strongyles and ascarids in equids featuring drug resistance with notes on ovids-emphasis on research at the University of Kentucky. SR-102 (Bulletin) Ag Exper Stat, University of Kentucky College of Agriculture, Lexington, KY

  • Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Collins SS (2006a) Field studies on endoparasites of Thoroughbred foals on seven farms in central Kentucky in 2004. Parasitol Res 98:496–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Collins SS (2006b) Prevalence of large endoparasites at necropsy in horses infected with Population B small strongyles in a herd established in Kentucky in 1966. Parasitol Res 99:114–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons ET, Tolliver SC, Ionita M, Collins SS (2008) Evaluation of parasiticidal activity of fenbendazole, ivermectin, oxibendazole, and pyrantel pamoate in horse foals with emphasis on ascarids (Parascaris equorum) in field studies on five farms in Central Kentucky in 2007. Parasitol Res 103:287–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peaty M (2008) Parascaris equorum resistance to moxidectin? Vet Rec 162:387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reinemeyer CR (2009) Diagnosis and control of anthelmintic-resistant Parascaris equorum. Parasit Vectors 2 (Suppl 2):S8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reinemeyer CR, Marchiondo AA (2007) Efficacy of pyrantel pamoate in horses against a macrocyclic lactone-resistant isolate of Parascaris equorum. Proc Am Assoc Vet Parasitol 52:78

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinemeyer CR, Prado JC, Marchiondo AA (2008) Efficacy of 2X pyrantel pamoate paste against a macrocyclic lactone-resistant isolate of Parascaris equorum in horses. Proc Am Assoc Vet Parasitol 53:32

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinemeyer CR, Prado JC, Eric C, Nichols EC, Marchiondo AA (2010) Efficacy of pyrantel pamoate against a macrocyclic lactone-resistant isolate of Parascaris equorum in horses. Vet Parasitol 171:111–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schougaard H, Nielsen MK (2007) Apparent ivermectin resistance of Parascaris equorum in foals in Denmark. Vet Rec 160:439–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slocombe JO, de Gannes RV, Lake MC (2007) Macrocyclic lactone resistant Parascaris equorum on stud farms in Canada and effectiveness of fenbendazole and pyrantel pamoate. Vet Parasitol 145:371–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srihakim S, Swerczek TW (1978) Pathologic changes and pathogenesis of Parascaris equorum infection in parasite-free pony foals. Am J Vet Res 39:1155–1160

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Doorn DCK, Lems S, Weteling A, Ploeger HW, Eysker M (2007) Resistance of Parascaris equorum against ivermectin due to frequent anthelmintic treatment of foals in The Netherlands. Proc World Assoc for the Advan Vet Parasitol, 21st Inter Conf, 19–23 August, 2007, Gent, Belgium

  • Veronesi F, Moretta I, Moretti A (2009) Field effectiveness of pyrantel and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment in Italian horse farms. Vet Parasitol 161:138–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi F, Fioretti DP, Genchi C (2010) Are macrocyclic lactones useful drugs for the treatment of Parascaris equorum infections in foals? Vet Parasitol 172:164–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, von Fritzen B, Demeler J, Schürmann S, Rohn K, Schnieder T, Epe C (2007) Cases of reduced cyathostomin egg-reappearance period and failure of Parascaris equorum egg count reduction following ivermectin treatment as well as survey on pyrantel efficacy on German horse farms. Vet Parasitol 144:74–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This investigation (paper no. 11-14-027) was made in connection with a project of the University of Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published with the approval of the director. The authors thank Dr. Igor Dzeverin from the Institute of Zoology NAS of Ukraine for his consultations in statistically processing the results. Research on the animals used in the study was approved by the University of Kentucky Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) under Protocol 2008–0257.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugene T. Lyons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyons, E.T., Tolliver, S.C., Kuzmina, T.A. et al. Further evaluation in field tests of the activity of three anthelmintics (fenbendazole, oxibendazole, and pyrantel pamoate) against the ascarid Parascaris equorum in horse foals on eight farms in Central Kentucky (2009–2010). Parasitol Res 109, 1193–1197 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2379-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2379-3

Keywords

Navigation