Skip to main content
Log in

Prevention of intestinal adhesions after laparotomy in a rat model — a randomized prospective study

  • Published:
Research in Experimental Medicine

Abstract

We prospectively studied the effect of a foam composite containing glycerin, propylene glycol, polyol, stearine, stearate and silicone oil, which is known to form a temporary barrier layer when applied to epithelial surface, on adhesion prevention in rats. The small intestine abrasion model was used for creation of adhesions. Sixty male Sabra rats of a mean weight of 295±23 g were randomly assigned into four groups: group 1 (n =20) underwent laparotomy and abrasion; group 2 (n =20) underwent laparotomy, abrasion and intra-peritoneal instillation of the foam composite; group 3 (n =10) underwent laparotomy with abrasion and a second laparotomy with adhesiolysis 2 weeks later; and group 4 (n =10), was treated in the same way as group 3 but during the second laparotomy the foam composite was instilled intraperitoneally. All animals were relaparotomized 2 weeks (groups 1 and 2) and 4 weeks (groups 3 and 4) after the initial laparotomy for adhesion scoring performed by a blinded independent investigator using the standard 0–3 adhesion grading score. Representative specimens of small intestine and liver from animals in groups 2 and 4 were analyzed. A significantly lower mean adhesion score was noted in group 2 (1.15±0.3) compared with that of group 1 (2.65±0.1) or group 3 (2.60±0.1) (P<0.01). Group 4 had a significantly lower score (1.4±0.3) than group 3 or group 1 (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean adhesion score between groups 1 and 3. Histological examination revealed no evidence of residual foam composite or adverse reaction to its use in the intestine and liver. The foam composite tested may reduce the severity of intestinal adhesions after laparotomy and may also reduce the severity of recurrent adhesions after adhesiolysis. Intraperitoneal use of this composite is safe in rats. The exact mechanism of action is unclear but may be related to the formation of a temporary microlayer that coats the injured surface of the intestine and facilitates healing without adhesion formation. Further investigation is needed to evaluate its full potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellis H (1982) The causes and prevention of intestinal adhesions. Br J Surg 69:241–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellis H (1980) Internal overhealing: the problem of intraperitoneal adhesions. World J Surg 4:303–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Menzies D, Ellis H (1989) Intra-abdominal adhesions and their prevention by topical tissue plasminogen activator. J R Soc Med 82:534–535

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yaacobi Y, Israel A, Goldberg E (1993) Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by tissue precoating with polymer solutions. J Surg Res 55:422–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg E, Sheets J, Habal M (1980) Peritoneal adhesion prevention with the use of hydrophilic polymer coating. Arch Surg 115:776–780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Second world week of professional updating in surgical and oncological disciplines of the university of Milan, July 15–21, 1990, Milan, Italy

  7. Protezione e prevenzione nella practica medica e chirurgica; 1990: September 30, Silviri Istanbul, Turkey

  8. Reissman P, Bloom A, Roisman I, Gross D, Durst A (1993) Prevention of post laparotomy adhesions using a foam composite of glycerine, propylene glycol, polyol, stearine, stearate and silicone oil. Res Surg 5:36–38

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dargenio R, Cimino C, Ragusa G, et al (1986) Pharmacological prevention of postoperative adhesions experimentally induced in rats. Acta Eur Fertil 17:267–270

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holtz G, Baker E, Tsai C (1980) Effect of thirty-two per cent dextran 70 on peritoneal adhesion formation and re-formation after lysis. Fertil Steril 33:660–662

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Oelsner G, Graebe RA, Pan SB, et al (1987) Chondroitin sulfate; a new intraperitoneal treatment for postoperative adhesion prevention in the rabbit J Reprod Med 32:812–814

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ballantyne DL, Howthorne G, Ben-Hur N, et al (1971) Effect of silicone fluid on experimentally induced peritoneal adhesions. Isr J Med Sci 7:1046–1049

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elkins TE, Bury RJ (1984) Adhesion prevention by solutions of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose in the rat. Fertil Steril 41:926–928

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gilmore OJA, Reid C (1987) Prevention of peritoneal adhesions by a new povidoneiodine/PVP solution. J Surg Res 25:477–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayer M, Yedgar S, Hurwitz A, et al (1988) Effect of viscous macromolecules on plasminogen activator activity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 159:957–963

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Manzies D (1993) Peritoneal adhesions-incidence, causes and prevention. Surg Ann 24:29–45

    Google Scholar 

  17. Interceed (TC7) Adhesion barrier study group (1989) Prevention of postsurgical adhesion by Interceed (TC7), an absorbable adhesion barrier: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Fertil Steril 51:933–938

    Google Scholar 

  18. Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, et al (1996) Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg 183:297–306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Innovatec (Brussels, Belgium) (1991) Dermofilm, medical profile and test results

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zamir, G., Bloom, A.I. & Reissman, P. Prevention of intestinal adhesions after laparotomy in a rat model — a randomized prospective study. Res. Exp. Med. 197, 349–353 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004330050083

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004330050083

Key words

Navigation