Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of postoperative pain treatment on outcome—current status and future strategies

  • Current Concepts in Clinical Surgery
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

The effect of postoperative pain relief on morbidity and hospital stay is reviewed.

Results

Beneficial effects of postoperative pain relief by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) opioids on morbidity and hospital stay have not been documented. The clinical outcome effects of the 20%–30% opioid sparing by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents have not been defined, but recent data suggest hastened recovery in cholecystectomy and knee surgery. The effect of continuous epidural analgesia on morbidity and hospital stay remains controversial except for improved pulmonary outcome. However, existing randomised trials on continuous epidural analgesia have insufficient design due to predominantly opioid-based epidural analgesia and the lack of a revision of perioperative care programmes to take advantage of the beneficial physiological effects of balanced epidural analgesia.

Conclusion

The effects of pain relief on outcome remains debatable, despite beneficial effects of pathophysiological responses. Future outcome studies are required where optimised dynamic pain relief is integrated with a multimodal rehabilitation programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kehlet H, Dahl JB (2003) Anaesthesia, surgery and challenges for postoperative recovery. Lancet 362:1921–1928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Walder B, Schafer M, Henzi I, Tramer MR (2001) Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled opioid analgesia for acute postoperative pain. A quantitative systematic review. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 45:795–804

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beattie WS, Badner NH, Choi P (2001) Epidural analgesia reduces postoperative myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 93:853–858

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ballantyne JC, Carr DB, deFerranti S, Suarez T, Lau J, Chalmers TC, Angelillo IF, Mosteller F (1998) The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials. Anesth Analg 86:598–612

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kehlet H, Holte K (2001) Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome. Br J Anaesth 87:62–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holte K, Kehlet H (2003) Postoperative epidural analgesia and outcome—a research agenda. In: Tramèr MR (ed) Evidence-based resource in anaesthesia and analgesia, 2nd edn. BMJ Books, pp 175–183

  8. Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, McKee A, Kehlet H, van Zundert A, Sage D, Futter M, Saville G, Clark T, MacMahon S (2000) Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ 321:1493–1497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilmore DW (2002) From Cuthbertson to fast-track surgery: 70 years of progress in reducing stress in surgical patients. Ann Surg 236:643–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kehlet H (1998) Modification of responses to surgery by neural blockade: clinical implications. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PS (eds) Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and management of pain, 3rd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, pp 129–175

  11. Holte K, Kehlet H (2002) Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia – effects on surgical stress responses and implications for postoperative nutrition. Clin Nutr 21:199–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holte K, Kehlet H (2002) Perioperative single-dose glucocorticoids administration: pathophysiologic effects and clinical implications. J Am Coll Surg 195:694–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Moiniche S, Dahl JB (2002) Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens on postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, PONV and pain after abdominal surgery (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Update Software, Oxford

  14. Kehlet H, Rung GW, Callesen T (1996) Postoperative opioid-analgesia: time for a reconsideration? J Clin Anesth 8:441–445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Power I, Barrett S (1999) Analgesic agents for the postoperative period. Non-opioids. Surg Clin N Am 79:275–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buvanendran A, Kroin JS, Tuman KJ, Lubenow TR, Elmofty D, Moric M, Rosenberg AG (2003) Effects of perioperative administration of a selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor on pain management and recovery of function after knee replacement. A randomised controlled trial. JAMA 290:2411–2418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gan TJ, Joshi GP, Viscusi E, Cheung RY, Dutsch W, Fort JD, Chen C (2004) Preoperative parenteral parecoxib and follow up oral valdecoxib reduces length of stay and improve quality of patient recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Anesth Analg (in press)

  18. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J (2003) Preoperative dexamethasone improves surgical outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Ann Surg 238:651–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sauerland S, Nagelschmidt M, Malmann P, Neugebauer EA (2000) Risks and benefits of preoperative high-dose methylprednisolone in surgical patients: a systematic review. Drug Saf 23:449–461

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Henzi I, Walder B, Tramèr MR (2000) Dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: a quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 90:186–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park WY, Thompson JS, Lee KK (2001) Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study. Ann Surg 234:560–569

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Norris EJ, Beattie C, Perler BA, Martinez EA, Meinert CL, Anderson GF, Grass JA, Sakima NT, Gorman R, Achuff SC, Martin BK, Minken SL, Williams GM, Traystman RJ (2001) Double-masked randomized trial comparing alternate combinations of intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in abdominal aortic surgery. Anesthesiology 95:1054–1067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rigg JR, Jamrozik K, Myles PS, Silbert BS, Peyton PJ, Parsons RW, Collins KS, MASTER Anaesthesia Trial Study Group. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia and outcome of major surgery: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:1276–1282

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peyton PJ, Myles PS, Silbert BS, Rigg JA, Jamrozik K, Parsons R (2003) Perioperative epidural analgesia and outcome after major abdominal surgery in high-risk patients. Anesth Analg 96:548–554

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. de Leon-Casasola OA (2003) When it comes to outcome, we need to define what a perioperative epidural technique is. Anesth Analg 96:315–318

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Holte K, Sharrock NE, Kehlet H (2002) Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess. Br J Anaesth 89:622–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brandstrup B, Tønnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortsø E, Ørding H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, the Danish Study Group on Perioperative Fluid Therapy (Iversen LH, Gramkow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen P-E, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppesen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F) (2003) Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens. A randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 238:641–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carli F, Mayo N, Klubien K, Schricker T, Trudel J, Belliveau P (2002) Epidural analgesia enhances functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life after colonic surgery: results of a randomized trial. Anesthesiology 97:540–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Perkins FM, Kehlet H (2000) Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology 93:1123–1133

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Macrae WA (2001) Chronic pain after surgery. Br J Anaesth 87:88–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a grant from the Danish Research Council (22-01-0160).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Gastroenterology 435, Hvidovre University Hospital, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark

    Henrik Kehlet

Authors
  1. Henrik Kehlet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik Kehlet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kehlet, H. Effect of postoperative pain treatment on outcome—current status and future strategies. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389, 244–249 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0460-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0460-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation