Skip to main content
Log in

Opposite effects of a time-trial and endurance cycling exercise on the neural efficiency of competitive cyclists

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Time-trial require cyclists to have an acute control on their sensory cues to regulate their pacing strategies. Pacing an effort accurately requires an individual to process sensory signals with efficacy, a factor that can be characterized by a high neural efficiency. This study aimed to investigate the effect of a cycling time-trial on neural efficiency in comparison to a low intensity endurance exercise, the latter supposedly not requiring high sensory control.

Methods

On two separate days, 13 competitive cyclists performed a session comprising of two 10 min treadmill tests, performed at different intensity zones from 1 to 5 on the rating subjective exercise intensity scale. The tests were performed before and after both a time-trial and endurance cycling exercise. Electroencephalography activity was measured during each intensity zones of the treadmill exercises. Neural efficiency was then calculated for each intensity block using the α/β electroencephalography activity ratio.

Results

The neural efficiency averaged on the 5 IZ decreased following the time-trial in the motor cortex (− 13 ± 8%) and prefrontal cortex (− 10 ± 12%), but not after the endurance exercise.

Conclusion

To conclude, the time-trial impaired the neural efficiency and increasing the RPE of the cyclists in the severe intensity zone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials are available.

Abbreviations

MC:

Motor cortex

PC:

Parietal cortex

PFC:

Prefrontal cortex

RSEI:

Rate of subjective exercise intensity

RPE:

Rate of perceived exertion

IZ:

Intensity zones

RPEIZblock :

RPE measured during a block of the treadmill test at different IZ of the RSEI scale (1–5)

α/β IZblock :

Alpha/beta ratio measured during a block of the treadmill test at different IZ of the RSEI scale (1–5)

α/β IZMean :

Averaged of the 5 α/βIZblock

END:

Endurance

TT:

Time-trial

References

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive any funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VS, TP, FG and AG conceived and design research. VS and TP conducted experiments. VS analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. TP, AG and FG read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Scholler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Each participant wrote informed consent, and the study was conducted following the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (1983) and approved by the regional ethics committee.

Additional information

Communicated by William J. Kraemer.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scholler, V., Groslambert, A., Pirlot, T. et al. Opposite effects of a time-trial and endurance cycling exercise on the neural efficiency of competitive cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol 123, 1991–2000 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05216-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05216-1

Keywords

Navigation