Skip to main content
Log in

The generalized force–velocity relationship explains why the preferred pedaling rate of cyclists exceeds the most efficient one

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most efficient pedaling rate (lowest oxygen consumption) at a workload of 50–300 W has been reported to be in the range of 42–60 rpm. By contrast, most competitive cyclists prefer a pedaling rate of more than 90 rpm. The reason for this difference is still unknown. We assume that the high pedaling rate preferred by cyclists can be explained by the inherent properties of muscle fibers. To obtain statements which do not depend on muscle’s cross-section and length, we generalized Hill’s characteristic equations where muscle force and heat liberation are related to shortening velocity. A pedaling rate of f ηmax yields to maximal efficiency, whereas the higher pedaling rate f Pmax leads to maximal power. The ratio f Pmax/f ηmax between these two pedaling rates ranges from 1.7 to 2.4, and it depends on the muscle’s fiber-type composition. In sprints and competitions of very short duration, f Pmax is more advantageous because energy supply is not the predominant limiting factor. The price to be paid for the most powerful pedaling rate is lower efficiency and higher energy cost. In longer exercises, economy is more important and the optimal pedaling rate shifts toward f ηmax. We conclude that the optimal pedaling rate, representing the fastest race performance, is not fixed but depends on race duration; it ranges between f ηmax and f Pmax. Our results are not only of interest for competitive cyclists but also for investigations using cycle ergometers: maximum power might not be reached by using a pedaling rate near the most efficient one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron R (2001) Aerobic and anaerobic power characteristics of off-road cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33:1387–1393

    Google Scholar 

  • Beneke R (2003) Methodological aspects of maximal lactate steady state—implications for performance testing. Eur J Appl Physiol 89:95–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Prampero PE (2000) Cycling on earth, in space, on the moon. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:345–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dorel S, Bourdin M, Van Praagh E, Lacour J-R, Hautier CA (2003) Influence of two pedalling rate conditions on mechanical output and physiological responses during all-out intermittent exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 89:157–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner J A, Claflin D R, McCully KK (1986) Power output of fast and slow fibers from human skeletal muscles. In: Jones NL, McCartney N, McComas AJ (eds) Human muscle power. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill., pp 81–94

  • Gotshall RW, Bauer TA, Fahrner SL (1996) Cycling cadence alters exercise hemodynamics. Int J Sports Med 17:17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill AV (1938) The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond 126:136–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill AV (1964) The effect of load on the heat of shortening of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond 159:297–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintosh BR, Neptune RR, Horton JF (2000) Cadence, power, and muscle activation in cycle ergometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1281–1287

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JC, Spirduso WW (2001) Determination of maximal cycling power: crank length, pedaling rate and pedal speed. Eur J Appl Physiol 84:413–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCartney N, Heigenhauser GJF, Jones NL (1983) Power output and fatigue of human muscle in maximal cycling exercise. J Appl Physiol 55:218–224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JS, Hansen EA, Sjøgaard G (2004) Pedalling rate affects endurance performance during high-intensity cycling. Eur J Appl Physiol 92:114–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant AJ (1994) Human power output and muscle fatigue. Int J Sports Med 15:116–121

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant AJ, Hoinville E, Young A (1981) Maximum leg force and power output during short-term dynamic exercise. J Appl Physiol 51:1175–1182

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vandewalle H, Pérès G, Heller J, Panel J, Monod H (1987) Force–velocity relationship and maximal power on a cycle ergometer. Eur J Appl Physiol 56:650–656

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt IR, Gibbs CL (1979) Recovery heat production of mammalian fast- and slow-twitch muscles. Am J Physiol 230:1637–1643

    Google Scholar 

  • Widrick JJ, Freedson PS, Hamill J (1992) Effect of internal work on the calculation of optimal pedaling rates. Med Sci Sport Exerc 24:376–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie DR (1960) Thermodynamics and the interpretation of biological heat measurements. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 10:259–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams PE, Goldspink G (1978) Changes in sarcomer length and physiological properties in immobilized muscle. J Anat 127:459–468

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Professor Pietro di Prampero’s helpful discussions during the preparation of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Götz Kohler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohler, G., Boutellier, U. The generalized force–velocity relationship explains why the preferred pedaling rate of cyclists exceeds the most efficient one. Eur J Appl Physiol 94, 188–195 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1283-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-004-1283-2

Keywords

Navigation