Abstract
Purpose
To determine age-and sex-related changes in periocular morphology in Caucasians using a standardized protocol.
Methods
Healthy Caucasian volunteers aged 18–35 and 60–90 years old were recruited from the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, between October 2018 and May 2020. Volunteers with facial asymmetry, facial deformities, history of facial trauma, facial surgery, botox injection, eyelid ptosis, strabismus, or nystagmus, were excluded. Standardized three-dimensional facial photos of 68 young volunteers and 73 old volunteers were taken in this clinical practice. Position changes of endocanthion, pupil center, and exocanthion were analyzed in different age and gender groups, including palpebral fissure width (PFW): distance between endocanthions (En-En), pupil centers (Pu–Pu), exocanthions (Ex-Ex), endocanthion and nasion (En-Na), pupil center and nasion (Pu-Na), exocanthion and nasion (Ex-Na), endocanthion and pupil center (Pu-En), exocanthion and pupil center (Pu-Ex), and palpebral fissure inclination (PFI); angle of endocanthions to nasion (En-Na-En), pupils to nasion (Pu-Na-Pu), exocanthions to nasion (Ex-Na-Ex); endocanthion inclination (EnI), and exocanthion inclination (ExI).
Results
PFW, En-En, Ex-Na, Pu-Ex, PFI, ExI, and Ex-Na-Ex were significantly different between the young and old groups (p ≤ 0.004). There were sex-related differences in PFW, Ex-Ex, En-Na, Pu-Na, Ex-Na, Pu-En, PFI, and EnI between both groups (p ≤ 0.041).
Conclusion
The position change of the pupil is minimal relative to age; it is preferred to establish the reference plane to describe periocular changes. The endocanthion tends to move temporally and inferiorly, while the exocanthion tends to shift nasally and inferiorly with age.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
With the advent of plastic and facial rejuvenation surgery in the last few decades [1], the influence of age on the facial and especially on the periocular morphology has attracted much attention [1,2,3]. Some studies investigated how aging affects facial structures to improve the outcomes of facial rejuvenation surgeries [2, 4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. However, at present, comprehensive studies on how aging changes the periocular morphology in Caucasian populations are insufficient; a standardized examination protocol with defined reference landmarks is missing.
There is always a need for surgical plans for eye rejuvenation surgery to be strictly designed before the surgeries. However, as there is no standardized examination protocol and specific standards for reference, this process is currently difficult to achieve. Surgeons often need to make supervisory judgments instead of a standardized process, which might relate to the unsatisfactory results after eye rejuvenation surgeries.
Evaluation of position changes of the periocular soft tissue could draw conflicting conclusions due to the lack of reliable reference landmarks. For example, Pieter et al. [3, 13] used the mid pupil as a reference line, while other reports [4, 14,15,16] used either the endocanthion or exocanthion to compare the eyebrow position [17, 18]. Price et al. [19] considered that eyebrow elevation occurs with aging. However, Lambros et al. [10] found that brows descended in 29% of patients. These contrasting conclusions may be related to the displacement of the reference plane. Although different methods to assess the brow position have been described [3, 6, 9, 14, 15, 20, 21], no standardized protocol has been defined [13]. Therefore, it is important to establish a validated stable reference plane with a minimal age-related variation.
Most existing studies compared morphological changes only using two-dimensional photography or cephalograms to analyze the variables [22, 23]. However, the development of three-dimensional stereophotography holds considerable promise for quantitative and accurate assessment of soft tissue, including the periocular region [22, 24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35].
Therefore, this study aimed to investigate age- and sex-related changes in ocular morphology in a Caucasian population using two- and three-dimensional stereophotography, to identify more reliable landmarks, thus establishing a standardized examination protocol for subsequent studies and routine clinical assessment.
Materials and methods
Healthy Caucasian volunteers aged 18–35 and 60–90 years were recruited in our study from the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Cologne, between October 2018 and May 2020. Volunteers with facial asymmetry, facial deformities, history of facial trauma, facial surgery, botox injection, eyelid ptosis, strabismus, or nystagmus were excluded. This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Approval was obtained from the local institutional ethics committee (No. 17–199), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Stereophotography
Stereophotography was conducted using the VECTRA M3 3D imaging system (Canfield Scientific, Inc., Fairfield, NJ, USA). Images were captured while the volunteers looked straight forward without any expression in the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane. The same operator took the photographs. The 2D images were converted from 3D images using Mirror software (Canfield Scientific, Inc., Fairfield, NJ, USA). The camera was calibrated before each use.
Measurements
For each patient, landmarks including the nasion; endocanthion; exocanthion; the pupil centers; the pupil center superior landmarks (on the perpendicular line passing through the pupil center); and the endocanthion superior landmarks (on the perpendicular line passing through the endocanthion) were labeled, as shown in Fig. 1.
The following nine linear distances (Fig. 1) were measured in the 3D images: (1) palpebral fissure width; (2) distance between endocanthions (En-En); (3) distance between pupil centers (Pu–Pu); (4) distance between exocanthions (Ex-Ex); (5) distance between the endocanthion and nasion (En-Na); (6) distance between the pupil center and the nasion (Pu-Na); (7) distance between exocanthion and nasion (Ex-Na); (8) distance between the endocanthion and the homolateral pupil center (Pu-En); and (9) distance between exocanthion and the homolateral pupil center (Pu-Ex).
Six angular measurements (Fig. 2) were carried out in 2D photographs: (1) The palpebral fissure inclination (PFI): the angle between the endocanthion superior landmark-endocanthion and endocanthion-exocanthion; (2) the angle of the endocanthions to nasion (En-Na-En); (3) the angle of the pupils to nasion (Pu-Na-Pu); (4) the angle of the exocanthions to nasion (Ex-Na-Ex); (5) the endocanthion inclination (EnI)—the angle between the pupil center superior landmark-pupil center line and the pupil center-endocanthion line; and (6) the exocanthion inclination (ExI)—the angle between the line of the pupil center superior landmark-pupil center and the line of pupil center-exocanthion.
Statistical analysis
SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. An independent sample t test was performed after the normal distribution was verified using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test to analyze differences between groups. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.
Results
A total of 141 Caucasian volunteers, including 68 young and 73 old participants, were recruited. The age composition of each group and the differences of nine linear distance and six angular measurements between the young and old groups are shown in Table 1. Differences of measurements between different ages are shown in Table 2.
There were differences in PFW between young females and old females aged 70–80 and 80–90 years (p < 0.001), while there were differences between young men and all subgroups of old men (p = 0.031, 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). Sex-related differences were observed in both the young and old groups (p = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively).
Differences in the nine linear distances and six angular measurements between different sexes are shown in Table 3. There were sex-related differences in the PFI in both the young and old groups (p = 0.010 and 0.001, respectively). There was a difference between females in the young group and those aged 80–90 years in the old group (p = 0.002), while males in the young group showed differences with those aged above 70 (p < 0.05).
The endocanthion-related measurements included En-En, En-Na, Pu-En, En-Na-En, and EnI. En-En significantly differed between the young and old groups (p < 0.001), but no significant differences were found between sexes in both the young and old groups (p = 0.175 and 0.683, respectively). However, women in the 80–90 subgroup showed differences with young and 70–80-year-old women (p < 0.001 and p = 0.045, respectively). En-Na distance did not significantly differ between the young and old groups (p = 0.253). However, sex differences existed in both the young and old groups (p < 0.001, respectively). Females in the 80–90-year subgroup showed differences with young females and those aged 60–70 for En-Na (p = 0.0031 and 0.0240, respectively). The Pu-En distance did not significantly differ between the young and old groups (p = 0.958). However, sex differences existed in both the young and old groups (p = 0.003 and 0.001, respectively). The En-Na-En was not significantly different between the young and old groups (p = 0.685). Also, no difference between sexes existed in both groups (p = 0.707 and 0.078, respectively). In contrast, male volunteers in the 60–70-year subgroup showed a difference with young males and females in the 60–70-year subgroup for En-Na-En (p = 0.047 and 0.035, respectively). The EnI was not significantly different between the young and old groups (p = 0.348). However, both the young and the old groups showed sex-related differences (p = 0.041 and 0.002, respectively). In addition, there were differences between females in the 60–70- and 80–90-year subgroups (p = 0.018).
Pupil center-related measurements included Pu–Pu, Pu-Na, and Pu-Na-Pu. No significant difference was found between the young and old groups for Pu–Pu (p = 0.054); however, differences between sexes were observed in the young group (p = 0.001). Females in the young group also differed from 80- to 90-year-old females (p = 0.035). There was no difference in Pu-Na between the young and old groups (p = 0.218), but differences were found between sexes in both groups (p < 0.001). There was no difference in Pu-Na-Pu between the young and old groups (p = 0.234), and no significant difference was found between sexes in the young group (p = 0.496) and between the young and old women (p = 0.247, 0.475, and 0.774 in each subgroup, respectively). However, the Pu-Na-Pu results for females and males in the old group were different (p = 0.031).
The exocanthion-related variables included Ex-Ex, Ex-Na, Pu-Ex, Ex-Na-Ex, and ExI. No significant differences were observed between the young and old groups for Ex-Ex (p = 0.114); however, a difference between sexes existed in both the young and old groups (p = 0.001 and 0.005, respectively). A difference in Ex-Na was observed between the young and old groups (p = 0.004). For females, the difference also existed between young and 70–80-year-old females (p = 0.009). There were sex-related differences in Pu-Ex in both the young and old groups (both p < 0.001). There were also significant differences in Pu-Ex between the young and old age groups (p < 0.001). Results of Pu-Ex for young females were significantly different from females aged 70–80 and 80–90 years (both p < 0.001). In contrast, Pu-Ex for males in the young group was significantly different from all old male subgroups (p = 0.002, 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). A difference was found between old men and women, with a p value of 0.014. However, Pu-Ex was not significantly different between females and males in the young group (p = 0.196). Ex-Na-Ex was significantly different between the young and old groups (p = 0.003). However, the values for female and male volunteers in the old group were different (p = 0.021). Ex-Na-Ex in the young male group was significantly different between males aged 60–70 and 80–90 years (p = 0.012 and 0.017, respectively), while we found no difference between young and old females (p = 0.341, 0.275, and 0.336, respectively). ExI was significantly different between the young and old groups (p < 0.001). ExI in the young female group was significantly different compared to old females in all subgroups (p = 0.037, 0.003, and 0.001, respectively), while ExI in the young male group differed with 80–90-year-old women (p < 0.001). Males in the 80–90-year-old subgroup showed differences with those in the 70–80-year-old subgroup and females in the 80–90-year-old subgroup (p = 0.003 and 0.007, respectively).
The PFW, En-En, Ex-Na, Pu-Ex, PFI, EnI, and En-Na-En significantly changed (all p < 0.05). The pupil-related measurements (Pu–Pu, Pu-Na, and Pu-Na-Pu) did not significantly differ between the young and elderly groups. However, Pu–Pu and Pu-Na were significantly different between the sexes. The En-Na, Pu-En, En-Na-En, and EnI did not significantly differ between the young and old groups. However, significant differences existed between sexes in both the young and old groups. More apparent changes were observed after the age of 80 years in females. There was a significant difference in En-En between the young and old groups; the difference was greater in women, especially those over 80 years old. Among females, there were significant differences between the young and older group over 80 years old (p < 0.001), and significant differences existed between females in the 70–80 and 80–90 subgroups (p = 0.045). Ex-Na, Pu-Ex, Ex-Na-Ex, and ExI were significantly different between the young and old groups. In addition, significant differences existed between the sexes, mainly occurring after 70 years for females and after 80 years for males. The PFW distance was significantly different between the young and old groups and became more significant after the age of 70 years for females and 60 years for males. The PFW distance was also significantly different between the two sexes, which could also be observed in the young groups. In addition, the difference between the young and old groups for PFI became evident after 80 years of age for females and 70 for males. The PFI was significantly different between sexes, which also existed in the young groups.
Discussion
Increasing attention has been paid to changes in periocular morphology in the last decade. However, the positional change of the endocanthion, pupil, and exocanthion during aging is still controversial [2, 4,5,6, 8]. Therefore, the positional changes of these landmarks were investigated in Caucasian populations of different ages and sexes in this study. Linear distance measurements were calculated in three-dimensional as well as two-dimensional photographs. Angle measurements were obtained from two-dimensional images to reduce the effect of redundant skin on measurements of older volunteers.
From our study, we can draw the following conclusions. First, the change in pupil position is minimal relative to age compared with other landmarks, although it has a sex difference among Caucasian populations. Furthermore, the endocanthion was not significantly sex-related, but it tends to move temporally and inferiorly with age, and the exocanthion tends to shift to the nasal and inferior sides with age (as shown in Fig. 3). Also, both these changes become more significant after the age of 70 years in females and the age of 80 years in males.
Our results are supported by some existing literature. Price et al. [19] reported that exocanthion descent is a component of periorbital aging in females. Val Lambros et al. [10] reported that 74% of the old patients exhibited medial drift of the exocanthion. Bruneau et al. [4] also confirmed that the exocanthion tendon’s laxity might also induce variations with aging. Van den Bosch et al. [36] performed a cross-sectional cohort study of 320 healthy volunteers aged between 10 and 89 years. Their results showed that the width of the horizontal eyelid fissure was shortened between the middle-aged and old age groups. They also considered that aging does not affect the position of the eyeball, which is consistent with our results and those of Darcy et al. [5] who confirmed that the globe position does not change significantly with the bony orbit in the superoinferior axis. Park et al. [37] reported that the palpebral fissure slant gradually decreases with age in Korean females when they approach their 60 s. Rhee et al. [38] suggested that pupillary distance is nearly constant in each ethnicity and could be used as an ethnic characteristic, consistent with the study conducted by Jonathan et al. [11] and our results.
Our results also differ from some previous studies concerning periocular morphology change with age. Van den Bosch et al. [36] considered that aging does not affect the lateral canthus’ position. However, their study did not measure absolute distances, which may have affected the accuracy of results. Interestingly, Val Lambros et al. [10] compared photographs of the same patients and reported that the endocanthion did not move laterally. The reason for this contradictory conclusion could be that the two-dimensional photos they used do not always accurately reflect the actual location, especially for distance measurements. Moreover, the standardized photo collection is another weakness when compared with 3D photography [24, 25, 39].
The nasion is the most anterior point of the frontonasal suture that joins the nasal part of the frontal bone and the nasal bones [40]. As the most used landmark in maxillofacial surgery and otorhinolaryngology, it is less affected by age after puberty and is used frequently to establish a reference plane [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48].
Val Lambros et al. [49] published a study in 2020, in which 594 patients were categorized into “young” and “old” groups by sex. Results of this study also showed that the horizontal eyelid distance of elderly volunteers was shortened by an average of 2.3 mm (p < 0.001) than young ones, and the lateral canthal angle moves medially. This conclusion was consistent with our research. However, his research only analyzes the horizontal changes of the eyelid fissure, and lacks the vertical direction, especially the changes in the movement trajectory relative to the nasion landmark.
Our results are also supported by some studies that focused on changes in orbital anatomy. Some studies indicate that due to weakened orbicularis muscle function, inferiorly directed tension is placed on the lower eyelid, which is attributed to slack palpebral skin and lateral tarsal ligaments and gravity, resulting in tendon attenuation and lower lid laxity [12]. Besides, some other studies [1, 50] have shown that the superomedial and inferolateral aspects of the orbital rim have a strong predisposition to resorption with aging as well as the orbital angle. They also showed that the mobility required for the function of the lateral orbital crow’s feet areas as well as the inferolateral orbital rim is structurally associated with a less ligamentous fixation of the soft tissues to the bone, which weakens the attachment of the muscles and ligaments to the bone in these areas. It is also reasonable to speculate that bone structure resorption could contribute to the facial ligament and muscle movement through the periosteum attachments. In addition, the ligament might move toward a more inferior inclined alignment as the ligament develops fatigue during aging [1]. Our results confirm that there is less movement of the endocanthion when compared with the exocanthion in older populations. In contrast, studies have shown that despite orbital bone absorption in the orbital rim, the eyeball position in the orbit can remain relatively stable [5], although some researchers have suggested enophthalmos due to orbital bone resorption [23].
Still, this study had some limitations. First, it was a cross-sectional population study based on comparisons among groups of individuals across different ages. Variations may affect the accuracy of results between individuals. Furthermore, although participants in the young and old groups are comparable, there were fewer volunteers in the 60–70 subgroup; thus, the results concerning this subgroup may not be as significant as those of the other subgroups. Nevertheless, in general, our sample size is adequate compared to other studies. Besides, the pupil position is often changed with eye movement, and obtaining the correct pupil position requires the operator’s repeated practice and good cooperation of the subject.
Additionally, we proposed the horizontal and vertical movements of the endocanthion and exocanthion with ages after a comprehensive analysis of linear distance in 3D photographs and angles in 2D photographs. However, we did not emphasize the sagittal changes of the pupil center, endocanthion, and exocanthion. On the one hand, the sagittal changes are impossible to measure for the pupil center and endocanthion blocked by the eyeball in lateral view. On the other hand, the sagittal movement has been incorporated in 3D positional changes, but it is not easy to separate it individually. To date, sagittal changes are often systematically hidden and ignored in 2D photography due to the lack of depth measurement, even though it might not be guaranteed that the above three landmarks would be stable in the sagittal direction with age. One of the study’s clinical significances is providing a more reliable and accurate reference plane for clinically eyebrow position-changing analysis, and we hope that this article might provide some guidance for 2D photography techniques. It is also hoped that sagittal changes can be better elucidated in the future as technology develops.
Nevertheless, our study provides researchers with further important information. First, the pupil is preferred over the endocanthion or exocanthion to establish the reference plane to describe periocular changes. Second, linear distance measurements using three-dimensional photographs are advantageous, while two-dimensional photographs are preferable for angular measurements.
In summary, our results demonstrated that the pupil is more stable during the aging process and is preferred to establish reference planes to describe the periocular aging changes. The exocanthion moves more dramatically than the endocanthion; both move inferiorly and toward the midline of the pupil with age. This process occurs earlier in females than in males.
References
Cotofana S, Fratila AA, Schenck TL, Redka-Swoboda W, Zilinsky I, Pavicic T (2016) The anatomy of the aging face: a review. Facial Plast Surg 32:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582234
Asaad M, Kelarji AB, Jawhar CS, Banuelos J, Taslakian E, Wahood W, Vyas KS, Sharaf B (2019) Eyebrow height changes with aging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7:e2433. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000002433
Lazarus D (2010) Changes in eyebrow position and shape with aging and brow lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1291–1292. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d45aee
Bruneau S, Foletti JM, Muller S, Vercasson C, Lauwers F, Guyot L (2016) Does the eyebrow sag with aging? An anthopometric study of 95 Caucasians from 20 to 79 years of age. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:305e–312e. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000475756.78956.40
Darcy SJ, Miller TA, Goldberg RA, Villablanca JP, Demer JL, Rudkin GH (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging characterization of orbital changes with age and associated contributions to lower eyelid prominence. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:921–929. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181811ce8 (discussion 930-921)
Glass LR, Lira J, Enkhbold E, Dimont E, Scofield S, Sherwood PR, Winn BJ (2014) The lateral brow: position in relation to age, gender, and ethnicity. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 30:295–300. https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0000000000000095
Iblher N, Gladilin E, Stark BG (2013) Soft-tissue mobility of the lower face depending on positional changes and age: a three-dimensional morphometric surface analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:372–381. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318278d67c
Imaizumi K, Taniguchi K, Ogawa Y, Matsuzaki K, Nagata T, Mochimaru M, Kouchi M (2015) Three-dimensional analyses of aging-induced alterations in facial shape: a longitudinal study of 171 Japanese males. Int J Legal Med 129:385–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-014-1114-x
Kraus D, Formoly E, Iblher N, Stark GB, Penna V (2019) A morphometric study of age- and sex-dependent changes in eyebrow height and shape(✰). J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 72:1012–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.01.011
Lambros V (2007) Observations on periorbital and midface aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1367–1376. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000279348.09156.c3 (discussion 1377)
Pointer JS (1999) The far interpupillary distance. A gender-specific variation with advancing age. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 19:317–326. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.1999.00441.x
Richard MJ, Morris C, Deen BF, Gray L, Woodward JA (2009) Analysis of the anatomic changes of the aging facial skeleton using computer-assisted tomography. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 25:382–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b2f766
Verduijn PS, Selles RW, Mureau MA (2014) A simple, reliable, and validated method for measuring brow position. Ann Plast Surg 73:81–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31826d298e
Kim BP, Goode RL, Newman JP (2009) Brow elevation ratio: a new method of brow analysis. Arch Facial Plast Surg 11:34–39. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2008.508
Matros E, Garcia JA, Yaremchuk MJ (2009) Changes in eyebrow position and shape with aging. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1296–1301. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b455e8
Sclafani AP, Jung M (2010) Desired position, shape, and dynamic range of the normal adult eyebrow. Arch Facial Plast Surg 12:123–127. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2010.17
Sidle DM, Loos BM, Ramirez AL, Kabaker SS, Maas CS (2005) Use of BioGlue surgical adhesive for brow fixation in endoscopic browplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7:393–397. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.7.6.393
Troilius C (1999) A comparison between subgaleal and subperiosteal brow lifts. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1079–1090 (discussion 1091-1072)
Price KM, Gupta PK, Woodward JA, Stinnett SS, Murchison AP (2009) Eyebrow and eyelid dimensions: an anthropometric analysis of African Americans and Caucasians. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:615–623. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addc98
Dar SA, Rubinstein TJ, Perry JD (2015) Eyebrow position following upper blepharoplasty. Orbit 34:327–330. https://doi.org/10.3109/01676830.2015.1078375
Huijing MA, van der Palen J, van der Lei B (2014) The effect of upper eyelid blepharoplasty on eyebrow position. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67:1242–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.05.022
Li Q, Zhang X, Li K, Quan Y, Cai X, Xu S, Zhu F, Lu R (2016) Normative anthropometric analysis and aesthetic indication of the ocular region for young Chinese adults. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 254:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3179-8
Park K, Guo Z, Park DH (2018) Measurement of the area of corneal exposure using digital image and its application during assessment for blepharoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42:208–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0980-2
Kim YC, Kwon JG, Kim SC, Huh CH, Kim HJ, Oh TS, Koh KS, Choi JW, Jeong WS (2018) Comparison of periorbital anthropometry between beauty pageant contestants and ordinary young women with Korean ethnicity: a three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42:479–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-1040-7
Jayaratne YS, Deutsch CK, Zwahlen RA (2013) Normative findings for periocular anthropometric measurements among Chinese young adults in Hong Kong. Biomed Res Int 2013:821428. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/821428
Andrade LM, Rodrigues da Silva AMB, Magri LV, Rodrigues da Silva MAM (2017) Repeatability study of angular and linear measurements on facial morphology analysis by means of stereophotogrammetry. J Craniofac Surg 28:1107–1111. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003554
Celebi AA, Kau CH, Ozaydin B (2017) Three-dimensional anthropometric evaluation of facial morphology. J Craniofac Surg 28:e470–e474. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003773
de Menezes M, Rosati R, Ferrario VF, Sforza C (2010) Accuracy and reproducibility of a 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetric imaging system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2129–2135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.036
Dindaroglu F, Kutlu P, Duran GS, Gorgulu S, Aslan E (2016) Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: a comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry. Angle Orthod 86:487–494. https://doi.org/10.2319/041415-244.1
Duppe K, Becker M, Schonmeyr B (2018) Evaluation of facial anthropometry using three-dimensional photogrammetry and direct measuring techniques. J Craniofac Surg 29:1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004580
Gibelli D, Pucciarelli V, Cappella A, Dolci C, Sforza C (2018) Are portable stereophotogrammetric devices reliable in facial imaging? A validation study of VECTRA H1 device. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 76:1772–1784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.01.021
Guo Y, Hou X, Rokohl AC, Jia R, Heindl LM (2019) Reliability of periocular anthropometry: a comparison of direct, 2-dimensional, and 3-dimensional techniques. Dermatol Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000002243
Guo Y, Schaub F, Mor JM, Jia R, Koch KR, Heindl LM (2020) A simple standardized three-dimensional anthropometry for the periocular region in a European population. Plast Reconstr Surg 145:514e–523e. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006555
Hyer JN, Murta F, Juniat VAR, Ezra DG (2020) Validating three-dimensional imaging for volumetric assessment of periorbital soft tissue. Orbit: 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2020.1711780
Jodeh DS, Curtis H, Cray JJ, Ford J, Decker S, Rottgers SA (2018) Anthropometric evaluation of periorbital region and facial projection using three-dimensional photogrammetry. J Craniofac Surg 29:2017–2020. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000004761
van den Bosch WA, Leenders I, Mulder P (1999) Topographic anatomy of the eyelids, and the effects of sex and age. Br J Ophthalmol 83:347–352. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.83.3.347
Park DH, Choi WS, Yoon SH, Song CH (2008) Anthropometry of asian eyelids by age. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1405–1413. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000304608.33432.67
Rhee SC, Lee SH (2010) Attractive composite faces of different races. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:800–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9606-7
Guo Y, Rokohl AC, Lin M, Heindl LM (2020) Three-dimensional anthropometry in periorbital region. Annals of Eye Science; Vol 6 (March 2021): Annals of Eye Science. https://doi.org/10.21037/aes-20-99
Newman GV, Newman RA (2003) The angle orthodontist. Angle Orthod 73:219. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073%3c0220:Rfdh%3e2.0.Co;2 (author reply 219-220)
Chortrakarnkij P, Lonic D, Lin HH, Lo LJ (2017) Establishment of a reliable horizontal reference plane for 3-dimensional facial soft tissue evaluation before and after orthognathic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 78:S139-s147. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000001020
Gibelli D, Collini F, Porta D, Zago M, Dolci C, Cattaneo C, Sforza C (2016) Variations of midfacial soft-tissue thickness in subjects aged between 6 and 18years for the reconstruction of the profile: a study on an Italian sample. Leg Med (Tokyo) 22:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.08.005
Gonzales PS, Machado CEP, Michel-Crosato E (2018) Photoanthropometry of the face in the young White Brazilian population. Braz Dent J 29:619–623. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201802027
Kasinathan G, Kommi PB, Kumar SM, Yashwant A, Arani N, Sabapathy S (2017) Evaluation of soft tissue landmark reliability between manual and computerized plotting methods. J Contemp Dent Pract 18:317–321. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2038
Przygocka A, Podgórski M, Jędrzejewski K, Topol M, Polguj M (2012) The location of the infraorbital foramen in human skulls, to be used as new anthropometric landmarks as a useful method for maxillofacial surgery. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 71:198–204
Shin KJ, Gil YC, Lee SH, Song WC, Koh KS, Shin HJ (2016) Positional relationship of ethmoidal foramens with reference to the nasion and its significance in orbital surgery. J Craniofac Surg 27:1854–1857. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000002911
Tsuzuki D, Watanabe H, Dan I, Taga G (2016) MinR 10/20 system: Quantitative and reproducible cranial landmark setting method for MRI based on minimum initial reference points. J Neurosci Methods 264:86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.02.024
Weinberg SM (2019) 3D stereophotogrammetry versus traditional craniofacial anthropometry: comparing measurements from the 3D facial norms database to Farkas’s North American norms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 155:693–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.06.018
Lambros V (2020) Facial aging: A 54-year, three-dimensional population study. Plast Reconstr Surg 145:921–928. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006711
Mendelson B, Wong CH (2012) Changes in the facial skeleton with aging: implications and clinical applications in facial rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36:753–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9904-3
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Jinhua Liu and Alexander C. Rokohl. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jinhua Liu, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Approval was obtained from the local institutional ethics committee (No. 17–199).
Consent to participate
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Meeting presentations
None.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Jinhua Liu and Alexander C. Rokohl contributed equally, and both should be considered first authors.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, J., Rokohl, A.C., Liu, H. et al. Age-related changes of the periocular morphology: a two- and three-dimensional anthropometry study in Caucasians. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 261, 213–222 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05746-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05746-y