Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical findings in eyes with BEST1-related retinopathy complicated by choroidal neovascularization

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the characteristics of eyes diagnosed with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) complicated by choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

Methods

This was a retrospective, multicenter observational case series. Fourteen genetically confirmed BVMD patients and 9 ARB patients who had been examined in 2 ophthalmological institutions in Japan were studied. The findings in a series of ophthalmic examinations including B-scan optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) were reviewed.

Results

CNV was identified in 5 eyes (17.9%) of BVMD patients and in 2 eyes (11.1%) of ARB patients. Three of 5 eyes with BVMD were classified as being at the vitelliruptive stage and 2 eyes at the atrophic stage. The CNV in 2 BVMD eyes were diagnosed as exudative because of acute visual acuity reduction, retinal hemorrhage, and intraretinal fluid, while the CNV in 3 BVMD eyes and 2 ARB eyes were diagnosed as non-exudative. The visual acuity of the two eyes with exudative CNV did not improve despite anti-VEGF treatments. None of the eyes with non-exudative CNV had a reduction of their visual acuity for at least 4 years. All of the CNV were located within hyperreflective materials which were detected in 16 eyes (57.1%) of the BVMD eyes and in 7 eyes (38.9%) of the ARB eyes.

Conclusions

CNV is a relatively common complication in BEST1-related retinopathy in Asian population as well. The prognosis of eyes with exudative CNV is not always good, and OCTA can detect CNV in eyes possessing hyperreflective materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, SU, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Petrukhin K, Koisti MJ, Bakall B et al (1998) Identification of the gene responsible for Best macular dystrophy. Nat Genet 19:241–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/915

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson AA, Guziewicz KE, Lee CJ, Kalathur RC, Pulido JS, Marmorstein LY, Marmorstein AD (2017) Bestrophin 1 and retinal disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 58:45–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.01.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Marmorstein AD, Marmorstein LY, Rayborn M, Wang X, Hollyfield JG, Petrukhin K (2000) Bestrophin, the product of the Best vitelliform macular dystrophy gene (VMD2), localizes to the basolateral plasma membrane of the retinal pigment epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:12758–12763. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.220402097

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson AA, Lee YS, Chadburn AJ, Tammaro P, Manson FD, Marmorstein LY, Marmorstein AD (2014) Disease-causing mutations associated with four bestrophinopathies exhibit disparate effects on the localization, but not the oligomerization, of Bestrophin-1. Exp Eye Res 121:74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2014.02.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Best F II (1905) Über eine hereditäre maculaaffektion. Beitrag zur Vererbungslehre Z Augenheilk 13:199–212

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gass JDM (1997) Heredodystrophic disorders affecting the pigment epithelium and retina. In: Gass JD (ed) Stereoscopic Atlas of Macular Diseases: Diagnosis and Treatment. St. Louis, C.V. Mosby, pp 304–325

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schatz P, Klar J, Andréasson S, Ponjavic V, Dahl N (2006) Variant phenotype of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy associated with compound heterozygous mutations in VMD2. Ophthalmic Genet 27:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13816810600677990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Burgess R, Millar ID, Leroy BP et al (2008) Biallelic mutation of BEST1 causes a distinct retinopathy in humans. Am J Hum Genet 82:19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.08.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Boon CJ, Klevering BJ, Leroy BJ, Hoyng CB, Keunen JE, den Hollander AI (2009) The spectrum of ocular phenotypes caused by mutations in the BEST1 gene. Prog Retin Eye Res 28:187–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2009.04.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakanishi A, Ueno S, Hayashi T, Katagiri S, Kominami T, Ito Y, Terasaki H et al (2016) Clinical and genetic findings of Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy in Japanese cohort. Am J Ophthalmol 168:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.04.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakanishi A, Ueno S, Hayashi T et al (2020) Changes of cone photoreceptor mosaic in Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. Retina 40:181–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hussain RN, Shahid FL, Empeslidis T, Ch’ng SW (2015) Use of intravitreal bevacizumab in a 9-year-old child with choroidal neovascularization associated with Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. Ophthalmic Genet 36:265–269. https://doi.org/10.3109/13816810.2014.962706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan KN, Mahroo OA, Islam F, Webster AR, Moore AT, Michaelides M (2017) Functional and anatomical outcomes of choroidal neovascularization complicating BEST1-related retinopathy. Retina 37:1360–1370. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shahzad R, Siddiqui MA (2017) Choroidal neovascularization secondary to Best vitelliform macular dystrophy detected by optical coherence tomography angiography. J AAPOS 21:68–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2016.08.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cennamo G, Cesarano I, Vecchio EC, Reibaldi M, de Crecchio G (2012) Functional and anatomic changes in bilateral choroidal neovascularization associated with vitelliform macular dystrophy after intravitreal bevacizumab. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 28:643–646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chhablani J, Jalali S (2012) Intravitreal bevacizumab for choroidal neovascularization secondary to Best vitelliform macular dystrophy in a 6-year-old child. Eur J Ophthalmol 22:677–679. https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guduru A, Gupta A, Tyagi M, Jalali S, Chhablani J (2018) Optical coherence tomography angiography characterisation of Best disease and associated choroidal neovascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol 102:444–447. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parodi MB, Romano F, Cicinelli MV, Rabiolo A, Arrigo A, Pierro L, Iacono P, Bandello F (2018) Retinal vascular impairment in Best vitelliform macular dystrophy assessed by means of optical coherence tomography angiography. Am J Ophthalmol 187:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parodi MB, Arrigo A, Bandello F (2020) Optical coherence tomography angiography quantitative assessment of macular neovascularization in Best vitelliform macular dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 61:61. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.6.6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar V, Chatra K (2018) Fibrotic pillar leads to focal choroidal excavation in Best vitelliform dystrophy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 256:2083–2087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-018-4120-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grossniklaus HE, Green WR (2004) Choroidal neovascularization. Am J Ophthalmol 137:496–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2003.09.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fujiki R, Ikeda M, Yoshida A et al (2018) Assessing the accuracy of variant detection in cost-effective gene panel testing by next-generation sequencing. J Mol Diagn 20:572–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.04.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mizobuchi K, Hayashi T, Yoshitake K, Fujinami K, Tachibana T, Tsunoda K, Iwata T, Nakano T (2020) Novel homozygous CLN3 missense variant in isolated retinal dystrophy: a case report and electron microscopic findings. Mol Genet Genomic Med 8:e1308. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Katagiri S, Hayashi T, Ohkuma Y, Sekiryu T, Takeuchi T, Gekka T, Kondo M, Iwata T, Tsuneoka H (2015) Mutation analysis of BEST1 in Japanese patients with Best’s vitelliform macular dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol 99:1577–1582. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S et al (2015) Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med 17:405–423. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gao T, Tian C, Hu Q, Liu Z, Zou J, Huang L, Zhao M (2018) Clinical and mutation analysis of patients with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy or Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy in Chinese population. Biomed Res Int 2018:4582816. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4582816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor Emeritus Duco Hamasaki of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute for the discussions and editing the final version of the manuscript. The swept-source optical coherence tomography device used in this study was on loan from Carl Zeiss Meditec.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant numbers 19K09928 to S.U. and 21K0975 to T.H. and Takayanagi Retina Research Award to M.M.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MM and SU conceived of the presented idea. MM, KM, and SU collected clinical and image data. TH and YK performed gene analysis. MM, JT, and SU verified the analytical methods. YI, HT, and KN helped supervise the project. SU supervised the project. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinji Ueno.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The procedures used in this study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Nagoya University (approval number 2020–0173) and Jikei University School of Medicine (approval number 24–231, 6997).

Consent to participate

Written informed consents were obtained from all the patient.

Consent for publication

I, SU, transfers to Springer the publication rights and he warrants that his contribution is original and that he has full power to make this grant. The author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.

I understand that the text and any pictures published in the article will be used only in educational publications intended for professional or if the publication or product is published on an open access basis, I understand that it will be freely available on the internet and may be seen by the general public. The pictures and text may also appear on other websites or in print, and may be translated into other languages or used for commercial purposes. I understand that the information will be published without my name attached, but that full anonymity cannot be guaranteed. I have been offered the opportunity to read the manuscript. I acknowledge that it is not possible to ensure complete anonymity, and someone may be able to recognize me. However, by signing this consent form, I do not in any way give up, waive, or remove my rights to privacy. I may revoke my consent at any time before publication, but once the information has been committed to publication (“gone to press”), revocation of the consent is no longer possible.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miyagi, M., Takeuchi, J., Koyanagi, Y. et al. Clinical findings in eyes with BEST1-related retinopathy complicated by choroidal neovascularization. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 260, 1125–1137 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05447-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05447-y

Keywords

Navigation