Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trabeculectomy offers better intraocular pressure reduction in intrapatient comparison to transscleral cyclophotocoagulation

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Both trabeculotomy (TE) as well as transscleral endodiode laser cyclophotocoagulation (CPC) are common approaches in glaucoma surgery. The purpose of this study was to perform an intraindividual comparison of these procedures carried out by the same surgeon in the same patient on the same day.

Methods

An observational monocentric retrospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with a bilateral refractory open-angle glaucoma who underwent trabeculectomy in one eye and transscleral endodiode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the fellow eye simultaneously were included and followed up with over the course of 1 year.

Results

Eighty-two eyes of 41 patients were included. Seventeen patients (41.5%) were men and 24 (58.5%) women. The mean age was 68.7 ± 9.5 years. The diagnosis comprised 33 (80.5%) patients with a primary open-angle glaucoma, five (12.2%) patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and three (7.3%) patients with pigment dispersion glaucoma. A reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) was seen in both after TE (from 26.2 ± 13.2 to 10.6 ± 4.1 mmHg, 52 weeks post-treatment) as well as CPC (from 24.2 ± 9.9 to 15.0 ± 5.4 mmHg, 52 weeks post-treatment). In comparison to each other, TE was significantly more effective in lowering the IOP (10.6 ± 4.1 vs. 13.4 ± 5.0; p = 0.0030, 52 weeks post-treatment) and needed antiglaucomatous medications (0.45 ± 0.80 vs. 1.24 ± 1.13; p = 0.0009, 52 weeks post-treatment). Consistently, the achievement rate of an IOP ≤ 16 mmHg without antiglaucomatous medications was significantly higher in TE-treated eyes (65.8% vs. 31.6%; p = 0.0019). Re-interventions, including 10 secondary TEs, were commonly required in those eyes undergoing CPC, especially in younger patients.

Conclusions

Trabeculectomy was demonstrated to be more effective in reducing IOP in comparison to fellow eyes receiving CPC. In particular, in younger patients, an additional TE in the CPC-treated eyes was necessary. The outcome of those secondary TEs however was comparable to the primarily performed TEs. Our study thus supports the use of CPC as tool to control IOP, especially in the context of bilateral refractive glaucoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, Mariotti SP (2004) Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 82:844–851

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bourne RR, Jonas JB, Flaxman SR, Keeffe J, Leasher J, Naidoo K, Parodi MB, Pesudovs K, Price H, White RA, Wong TY, Resnikoff S, Taylor HR, Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease S (2014) Prevalence and causes of vision loss in high-income countries and in Eastern and Central Europe: 1990-2010. Br J Ophthalmol 98:629–638. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M, Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial G (2002) Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, ILL: 1960) 120:1268–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Prum BE Jr, Lim MC, Mansberger SL, Stein JD, Moroi SE, Gedde SJ, Herndon LW Jr, Rosenberg LF, Williams RD (2016) Primary open-angle Glaucoma suspect preferred practice pattern((R)) guidelines. Ophthalmology 123:P112–P151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.10.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirwan JF, Lockwood AJ, Shah P, Macleod A, Broadway DC, King AJ, McNaught AI, Agrawal P, Trabeculectomy Outcomes Group Audit Study G (2013) Trabeculectomy in the 21st century: a multicenter analysis. Ophthalmology 120:2532–2539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reibaldi A, Uva MG, Longo A (2008) Nine-year follow-up of trabeculectomy with or without low-dosage mitomycin-c in primary open-angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 92:1666–1670. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.140939

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Landers J, Martin K, Sarkies N, Bourne R, Watson P (2012) A twenty-year follow-up study of trabeculectomy: risk factors and outcomes. Ophthalmology 119:694–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.09.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zahid S, Musch DC, Niziol LM, Lichter PR, Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study G (2013) Risk of endophthalmitis and other long-term complications of trabeculectomy in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS). Am J Ophthalmol 155:674–680, 680 e671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.10.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grehn F (2008) Surgery of primary open angle glaucoma. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 225:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1027124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rotchford AP, Jayasawal R, Madhusudhan S, Ho S, King AJ, Vernon SA (2010) Transscleral diode laser cycloablation in patients with good vision. Br J Ophthalmol 94:1180–1183. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2008.145565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin SC (2008) Endoscopic and transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for the treatment of refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma 17:238–247. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815f2539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bloom PA, Tsai JC, Sharma K, Miller MH, Rice NS, Hitchings RA, Khaw PT (1997) “Cyclodiode”. Trans-scleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of advanced refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmology 104:1508–1519 discussion 1519-1520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bruggemann A, Despouy JT, Wegent A, Muller M (2013) Intraindividual comparison of canaloplasty versus trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in a single-surgeon series. J Glaucoma 22:577–583. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e318255bb30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL (2007) Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy study after one year of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 143:9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dulli L, Winkler N, Toteberg-Harms M, Funk J, Schweier C (2015) Visual outcome after trabeculectomy—a retrospective study. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 232:399–404. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1545813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matlach J, Dhillon C, Hain J, Schlunck G, Grehn F, Klink T (2015) Trabeculectomy versus canaloplasty (TVC study) in the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Acta Ophthalmol 93:753–761. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.12722

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. WuDunn D, Cantor LB, Palanca-Capistrano AM, Hoop J, Alvi NP, Finley C, Lakhani V, Burnstein A, Knotts SL (2002) A prospective randomized trial comparing intraoperative 5-fluorouracil vs mitomycin C in primary trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 134:521–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kramp K, Vick HP, Guthoff R (2002) Transscleral diode laser contact cyclophotocoagulation in the treatment of different glaucomas, also as primary surgery. Graefe’s archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 240:698–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-002-0508-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Flamm C, Wiegand W (2004) Intraocular pressure after cyclophotocoagulation with the diode laser. Ophthalmologe 101:263–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-003-0913-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Winkler NF, Funk J (2013) Transscleral cyclophotocoagulation as primary surgical intervention in glaucoma. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 230:353–357. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1328359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schlote T, Grub M, Kynigopoulos M (2008) Long-term results after transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in refractory posttraumatic glaucoma and glaucoma in aphakia. Graefe’s archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 246:405–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-007-0708-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pucci V, Tappainer F, Borin S, Bellucci R (2003) Long-term follow-up after transscleral diode laser photocoagulation in refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 217:279–283. https://doi.org/10.1159/000070635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Noureddin BN, Zein W, Haddad C, Ma'luf R, Bashshur Z (2006) Diode laser transcleral cyclophotocoagulation for refractory glaucoma: a 1 year follow-up of patients treated using an aggressive protocol. Eye (London, England) 20:329–335. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6701875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Iliev ME, Gerber S (2007) Long-term outcome of trans-scleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 91:1631–1635. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.116533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hasan S, Theilig T, Unterlauft JD (2019) Comparing the efficacy of trabeculectomy and diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in primary open-angle glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-019-01093-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fieß A, Shah P, Sii F, Godfrey F, Abbott J, Bowman R, Bauer J, Dithmar S, Philippin H (2017) Trabeculectomy or transscleral cyclophotocoagulation as initial treatment of secondary childhood glaucoma in Northern Tanzania. J Glaucoma 26:657–660. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh K, Dangda S, Ahir N, Mutreja A, Bhattacharyya M (2017) Diode laser cyclophotocoagulation paves way to a safer trabeculectomy in eyes with medically uncontrollable intraocular pressure. Int Ophthalmol 37:365–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0270-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kosoko O, Gaasterland DE, Pollack IP, Enger CL (1996) Long-term outcome of initial ciliary ablation with contact diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for severe glaucoma. The Diode Laser Ciliary Ablation Study Group. Ophthalmology 103:1294–1302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Paul.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Philipps-University Marburg, Germany, and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paul, C., Kaus, S., Müller, HH. et al. Trabeculectomy offers better intraocular pressure reduction in intrapatient comparison to transscleral cyclophotocoagulation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 257, 2481–2487 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04450-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04450-8

Keywords

Navigation