Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes after stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Stenting is a common endovascular therapy for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS). We sought to update the evaluation of global short-term safety and long-term efficacy outcomes after stenting for symptomatic ICAS and explore their distributional characteristics.

Methods

Major databases including Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE were systematically searched from January 1st, 2005, for RCTs and observational studies which reported short- and long-term outcomes after stenting for symptomatic ICAS. Each outcome was pooled with meta-analysis and the impacts of study location, publication time, and other population characteristics were further assessed by the univariate and multivariate Poisson regression analyses.

Results

A total of 8408 patients were identified in 92 studies from 16 countries across five WHO regions. The estimated rate of short-term stroke or death was 6.68% (95% CI 5.60–8.36%), and the rate of long-term stroke or death was 4.43% (95% CI 2.61–6.60%). After adjustment of age, sex, study location, preprocedual stenosis, publication period and study design, multivariate regression analysis showed that the rate of short-term stroke or death was different between Western and Eastern countries (10.27% versus 5.52%, p = 0.018). The rates of short-term, stroke, ischemic stroke and long-term death were also significantly higher in Western compared to Eastern countries.

Conclusion

This systematic review provided the worldwide profile of short- and long-term outcomes of stenting for symptomatic ICAS. The generally acceptable outcomes indicate that stenting may still be feasible in selected patients. Regional disparity calls for more cautious decisions and future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banerjee C, Chimowitz MI (2017) Stroke caused by atherosclerosis of the major intracranial arteries. Circ Res 120:502–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Global Health Estimates 2016 (2018) Deaths by cause, age, sex, by country and by region, 2000–2016. World Health Organization, Geneva. https://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/

  3. Qureshi AI, Caplan LR (2014) Intracranial atherosclerosis. Lancet 383:984–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bang OY (2014) Intracranial atherosclerosis: current understanding and perspectives. J Stroke 16:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Holmstedt CA, Turan TN, Chimowitz MI (2013) Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol 12:1106–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wityk RJ, Lehman D, Klag M, Coresh J, Ahn H, Litt B (1996) Race and sex differences in the distribution of cerebral atherosclerosis. Stroke 27:1974–1980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Gu Q, Zamanillo MC (1995) Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The northern manhattan stroke study. Stroke 26:14–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wong LK (2006) Global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis. Int J Stroke 1:158–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu Z, Yao C, Zhao D, Wu G, Wang W, Liu J et al (2001) Sino-MONICA project: a collaborative study on trends and determinants in cardiovascular diseases in china, part I: morbidity and mortality monitoring. Circulation 103:462–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aghaebrahim A, Jovin T, Jadhav AP, Noorian A, Gupta R, Nogueira RG (2014) Endovascular recanalization of complete subacute to chronic atherosclerotic occlusions of intracranial arteries. J Neurointerv Surg 6:645–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cruz-Flores S, Diamond AL (2006) Angioplasty for intracranial artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):Cd004133

  12. Gao P, Zhao Z, Wang D, Wu J, Cai Y, Li T et al (2015) China angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial severe stenosis (CASSISS): a new, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in china. Interv Neuroradiol 21:196–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma N, Mo DP, Gao F, Miao ZR (2013) Endovascular recanalization for chronic symptomatic middle cerebral artery total occlusion. J Neurointerv Surg 5:e15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Fiorella D, Turan TN, Janis LS et al (2014) Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet 383:333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Turan TN, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Chimowitz MI (2009) Treatment of atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis. Stroke 40:2257–2261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abou-Chebl A, Steinmetz H (2012) Critique of “stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis” by Chimowitz et al in the New England Journal of Medicine. Stroke 43:616–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsivgoulis G, Katsanos AH, Magoufis G, Kargiotis O, Papadimitropoulos G, Vadikolias K et al (2016) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 9:351–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu SC, Leung TW, Lee KT, Wong LK (2014) Angioplasty and stenting of intracranial atherosclerosis with the wingspan system: 1-year clinical and radiological outcome in a single asian center. J Neurointerv Surg 6:96–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. BMJ 339:b2535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW, Alberts MJ, Chaturvedi S, Feldmann E et al (2009) Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: A scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association stroke council; council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia; council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention; council on cardiovascular nursing; and the interdisciplinary council on peripheral vascular disease. The american academy of neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 40:2276–2293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eypasch E, Lefering R, Kum CK, Troidl H (1995) Probability of adverse events that have not yet occurred: A statistical reminder. BMJ 311:619–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu TX, Li Y, Liu GJ (2006) Investigation of authenticity of ‘claimed’ randomized controlled trials (rcts) and quality assessment of RCT reports published in china, Dublin, Ireland. https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/investigation-authenticity-claimed-randomized-controlled-trials-rcts-quality-assessment-rct-reports/

  23. Gress DR, Smith WS, Dowd CF, Van Halbach V, Finley RJ, Higashida RT (2002) Angioplasty for intracranial symptomatic vertebrobasilar ischemia. Neurosurgery 51:23–27 (discussion 27–29)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Higashida RT, Tsai FY, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, Smith T, Fraser K et al (1993) Transluminal angioplasty for atherosclerotic disease of the vertebral and basilar arteries. J Neurosurg 78:192–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, Bravata DM, Chimowitz MI, Ezekowitz MD et al (2014) Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke 45:2160–2236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yu S, Leung T, Lee K, Wong L. Angioplasty and stenting of intracranial atherosclerosis with the wingspan system: 1-year clinical and radiological outcome in a single asian center. 2014;6:96–102

  27. Luo J, Wang T, Gao P, Krings T, Jiao L (2018) Endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: current debates and future prospects. Front Neurol 9:666

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2016YFC1301700). The funder has no role in study design, implementation, data analysis, manuscript writing and publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liqun Jiao.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Research involving human participants and/or animal

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data and does not involve human participants and/or animals. Thus, no ethical approval is needed.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25020 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, T., Yang, K., Luo, J. et al. Outcomes after stenting for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol 267, 581–590 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-09176-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-09176-x

Keywords

Navigation