Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous dopaminergic delivery in Parkinson’s disease

  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias occur in the majority of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and are likely to result from changes in dopamine production, storage and release, occurring as consequences of the nigrostriatal degenerative process. All studies comparing levodopa versus dopamine agonist early therapy indicate that initiation with agonists is associated with a reduced risk of motor complications —in particular, dyskinesias— possibly because agonists’ longer half-lives provide continuous dopaminergic delivery. In advanced PD patients, switching from a pulsatile to continuous dopaminergic delivery may widen patients’ therapeutic window. Currently, this can be accomplished only with subcutaneous apomorphine or duodenal levodopa infusions. Apomorphine is a highly soluble agonist whose effect is similar to dopamine. Conversely, replacing whole oral therapy with levodopa infusion bypasses gastric emptying and avoids peaks and troughs in plasma by releasing levodopa in the duodenum/jejunum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fabbrini G, Brotchie JM, Grandas F, Nomoto M, Goetz CG (2007) Levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Mov Disord 22:1379–1389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schrag A, Quinn N (2000) Dyskinesias and motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. A community-based study. Brain 123:2297–2305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chapuis S, Ouchchane L, Metz O, Gerbaud L, Durif F (2005) Impact of the motor complications of Parkinson’s disease on the quality of life. Mov Disord 20:224–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Antonini A, Barone P (2008) Dopamine agonist-based strategies in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Sci 29(Suppl 5):S371–S374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hardie RJ, Lees AJ, Stern GM (1984) On-off fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. A clinical and neuropharmacological study. Brain 107:487–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grandas F, Luquin MR, Rodriguez M, Vaamonde J, Lera G, Obeso JA (1992) Motor fluctuations in Parkinson disease: risk factors. Neurologia 7:89–93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenner P (2004) Avoidance of dyskinesia: preclinical evidence for continuous dopaminergic stimulation. Neurology 62(1 Suppl 1):S47–S55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stock Exchange Release: Primary objective of STRIDE-PD study was not achieved. Orion Corporation (Finland) 2009

  9. Antonini A, Tolosa E, Mizuno Y, Yamamoto M, Poewe W (2009) A reassessment of risks and benefits of dopamine agonists in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 8:929–937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rascol O, Brooks DJ, Korczyn AD, De Deyn PP, Clarke CE, Lang AE (2000) A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson’s disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa. 056 Study Group. N Engl J Med 342(20):1484–1491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parkinson Study Group (2009) Long-term effect of initiating Pramipexole vs. Levodopa in early Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 66(5):563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hauser RA, Rascol O, Korczyn AD, Jon Stoessl A, Watts RL, Poewe W et al (2007) Ten-year follow-up of Parkinson’s disease patients randomized to initial therapy with ropinirole or levodopa. Mov Disord 22(16):2409–2417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katzenschlager R, Head J, Schrag A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Evans A, Lees AJ (2008) Fourteen-year final report of the randomized PDRG-UK trial comparing three initial treatments in PD. Neurology 71(7):474–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Poewe W, Kleedorfer B, Wagner M, Bosch S, Schelosky L (1993) Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusions for fluctuating Parkinson’s disease. Long-term follow-up in 18 patients. Adv Neurol 60:656–659

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Poewe WH, Rascol O, Quinn N, Tolosa E, Oertel WH, Martignoni E et al (2007) Efficacy of pramipexole and transdermal rotigotine in advanced Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 6(6):513–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Katzenschlager R, Hughes A, Evans A, Manson AJ, Hoffman M, Swinn L et al (2005) Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine therapy improves dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease: a prospective study using single-dose challenges. Mov Disord 20(2):151–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stocchi F, Ruggieri S, Vacca L, Olanow CW (2002) Prospective randomized trial of lisuride infusion versus oral levodopa in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain 125(Pt 9):2058–2066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Antonini A, Tolosa E (2009) Apomorphine and levodopa infusion therapies for advanced Parkinson’s disease: selection criteria and patient management. Expert Rev Neurother 9:859–867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurlan R, Rothfield KP, Woodward WR et al (1988) Erratic gastric emptying may cause “random” fluctuations of parkinsonian mobility. Neurology 38:419–421

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Antonini A (2007) New strategies in motor parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 13(Suppl 3):S446–S449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mouradian MM, Juncos J, Fabbrini G, Chase TN (1987) Motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease: pathogenetic and therapeutic studies. Ann Neurol 22:475–479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurlan R, Nutt JG, Woodward WR et al (1988) Duodenal and gastric delivery of levodopa in Parkinsonism. Ann Neurol 23:589–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sage JI, Sonsalla PK, McHale DM et al (1990) Clinical experience with duodenal infusions of levodopa for the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson’s disease. Adv Neurol 53:383–386

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nyholm D, Nilsson Remahl AI, Dizdar N et al (2005) Duodenal levodopa infusion monotherapy vs. oral polypharmacy in advanced Parkinson disease. Neurology 64:216–223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nyholm D (2006) Enteral levodopa/carbidopa gel infusion for the treatment of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Expert Rev Neurother 6:1403–1411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Antonini A, Isaias IU, Canesi M, Zibetti M, Mancini F, Manfredi L et al (2007) Duodenal levodopa infusion for advanced Parkinson’s disease: 12-month treatment outcome. Mov Disord 22(8):1145–1149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Honig H, Antonini A, Martinez-Martin P et al (2009) Intrajejunal levodopa infusion in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot multicenter study of effects on nonmotor symptoms and quality of life. Mov Disord 24:1468–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Antonini A, Chaudhuri KR, Martinez-Martin P, Odin P (2010) Oral and infusion based strategies for managing motor complications in patients with Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs 24(2):119–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Dr. Antonini has received honoraria from Solvay and Chiesi Pharmaceuticals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelo Antonini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antonini, A., Ursino, G., Calandrella, D. et al. Continuous dopaminergic delivery in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 257 (Suppl 2), 305–308 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5714-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5714-1

Keywords

Navigation