Abstract
Free delayed recall is considered the memory measure with the greatest sensitivity for the early diagnosis of dementia. However, its specificity for dementia could be lower, as deficits other than those of pure memory might account for poor performance in this difficult and effortful task. Cued recall is supposed to allow a better distinction between poor memory due to concurrent factors and impairments related to the neurodegenerative process. The available cued recall tests suffer from a ceiling effect. This is a prospective, longitudinal study aiming to assess the utility of a new memory test based on cued recall that avoids the ceiling effect in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Twenty-five patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 22 probable AD patients (NINCDS-ADRDA) at a mild stage, 22 elderly patients with subjective memory complaints (SMC) and 38 normal age-matched controls took part in the study. The patients underwent a thorough cognitive evaluation and the recommended screening procedure for the diagnosis of dementia. All patients were re-examined 12–18 months later. A newly devised delayed cued recall test using semantic cues (The RI48 Test) was compared with three established memory tests: the Ten Word-List Recall from CERAD, the “Doors” and the “Shapes” Tests from “The Doors and People Test Battery”. Forty-four % of the MCI patients fulfilled criteria for probable AD at follow-up. The RI48 Test classified correctly 88% of the MCI and SMC participants and was the best predictor of the status of MCI and mild AD as well as the outcome of the MCI patients. Poor visual memory was the second best predictor of those MCI patients who evolved to AD. A cued recall test which avoids the ceiling effect is at least as good as the delayed free recall tests in the early detection of AD.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam S, Van der Linden M, Poitrenaud J, Kalafat M, et les membres du GREMEM (2004) L’épreuve de rappel indicé à 48 items (RI-48). In: Van der Linden M, Adam S, Agniel A, Baisset Mouly C, et al. (eds) L’évaluation des troubles de la mémoire: Présentation de quatres tests de mémoire épisodique (avec leur étalonnage). Marseille: Solal
Albert MS (1996) Cognitive and neurobiological markers of early Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:13547–13551
Baddeley A, Emslie H, Nimmo-Smith I (1994) Doors and People. Thames Valley Test Company
Buschke H, Sliwinski MJ, Kuslansky G, Lipton RB (1997) Diagnosis of early dementia by the Double Memory Test: Encoding specificity improves diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Neurology 48:989–997
Buschke H (1984) Cued recall in amnesia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 6:433–440
de Partz MP, Bilocq V, De Wilde V, Seron X, Pillon A (2001) LEXIS: Tests pour l’évaluation des troubles lexicaux chez la personne aphasique. Marseille: Solal
Elias MF, Beiser A, Wolf PA, Au R, White RF, D’Agostino RB (2000) The preclinical phase of Alzheimer disease. A 22-year prospective study of the Framingham Cohort. Arch Neurol 57:808–813
Ergis AM, Van der Linden M, Deweer B (1994) L’exploration des troubles de la mémoire épisodique dans la maladie d’Alzheimer débutante au moyen d’une épreuve de rappel indicé. Rev Neuropsychol 4:47–68
Flicker C, Ferris SH, Reisberg B (1993) A longitudinal study of cognitive function in elderly persons with subjective memory complaints. J Am Geriatr Soc 41:1029–1032
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini Mental State”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198
Gifford DR, Cummings JL (1999) Evaluating dementia screening tests. Methodologic standards to rate their performance. Neurology 52:224–227
Greene JDW, Baddeley AD, Hodges JR (1996) Analysis of the episodic memory deficit in early Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from the doors and people test. Neuropsychologia 34:537–551
Grober E, Buschke H, Crystal H, Bang S, Dresner R (1988) Screening for dementia by memory testing. Neurology 38:900–903
Grober E, Lipton RB, Hall C, Crystal H (2000) Memory impairment on free and cued selective reminding predicts dementia. Neurology 54:827–832
Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982) The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143:29–36
Hogrefe CJ (1962) Test d2. Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie
Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Cohen LA, Martin RL (1982) A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 140:566–572
Ivanoiu A, Adam S, Van der Linden M, et al. (2000) The episodic memory evaluation in incipient Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol 247(Suppl 3):III/13 (Abstract)
Ivanoiu A, Vanderlinden M, Seron X, Sindic CJM (1999) Contribution of free and cued recall to the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol 246 (Suppl 1):I/122 (Abstract)
Jonker C, Geerlings MI, Schmand B (2000) Are memory complaints predictive for dementia? A review of clinical and population-based studies. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 15:983–991
Kertesz A, Mohs RC (1999) Cognition. In: Gauthier S (ed) Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2nd ed. London: Martin Dunitz, Ltd., pp 179–196
Mattis S (1988) Dementia Rating Scale: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources
McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, et al. (1984) Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 34:939–944
Meiran N, Stuss D, Guzman A, Lafleche G, Willmer J (1996) Diagnosis of dementia. Methods for interpretation of scores of 5 neuropsychological tests. Arch Neurol 53:1043–1054
Morris JC, Mohs RC, Rogers H, Fillenbaum G, Heyman A (1988) Consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD). Clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Psychopharmacol Bull 24:641–644
Petersen RC, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Kokmen E, Tangalos EG (1994) Memory function in very early Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 44:867–872
Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E (1999) Mild cognitive impairment. Clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 56:303–308
Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology (1994) Practice parameter for diagnosis and evaluation of dementia (summary statement). Neurology 44:2203–2206
Ritchie K, Fuhrer R (1992) A comparative study of the performance of screening tests for senile dementia using receiver operating characteristics analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 45:627–637
Rouleau I, Salmon DP, Butters N, Kennedy C, McGuire K (1992) Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses of Clock Drawings in Alzheimer’s and Huntington Disease. Brain Cogn 18:70–87
Small BJ, Fratiglioni L, Viitanen M, Winblad B, Backman L (2000) The course of cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Three- and 6-year follow-up of a population-based sample. Arch Neurol 57:839–844
StatView (1992–1994) Abacus Concepts, Inc.
Tuokko H, Vernon-Wilkinson R, Weir J, Beattie BL (1991) Cued recall and early identification of dementia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 13:871–879
Welsh K, Butters N, Hughes J, Mohs R, Heyman A (1991) Detection of abnormal memory decline in mild cases of Alzheimer’s disease using CERAD neuropsychological measures. Arch Neurol 48:278–281
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ivanoiu, A., Adam, S., Van der Linden, M. et al. Memory evaluation with a new cued recall test in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol 252, 47–55 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0597-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0597-2