Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Establishment of two forensic medicine OSCE stations on the subject of external post-mortem examination

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An improvement in quality of medical external post-mortem examinations among others can be achieved by more intensive training of medical students. Modern learning and teaching methods such as e-learning modules and SkillsLab stations should be used for this. The introduction of corresponding methods of assessment such as the OSCE procedure is necessary to test the success of learning. In Halle (Germany), two OSCE stations on the subject of external post-mortem examinations were introduced in 2016. The ‘practical external post-mortem examination’ station test skills and abilities students have learned during practical external post-mortem examination in small group classes on a simulation doll. At the ‘death certificate’ station, an original death certificate must be filled in, testing the knowledge, skills and abilities learned in the SkillsLab station and during e-learning. A total of 148 students took part in the test. At both stations, at least two thirds of the students (69.5 and 81.7%) were able to show good or very good test results. In addition to the strengths, a detailed evaluation of the test results showed that there were still deficits in terms of the corresponding courses (e.g. inspection of the neck region in the small group classes), which will have to be remedied in the future. When analysing the test concept and the test implementation, objectivity was nearly perfect. There was a satisfactory internal consistency and stability over 8 months. Ultimately, in addition to several strengths (such as good understanding and transparency of the checklists) the evaluation of the examiners also showed further potential areas for improvement (e.g. harmonisation of the degree of difficulty for the individual rotations) when designing the OSCE stations. Overall, it was possible to determine that the OSCE testing format is a suitable tool to test external post-mortem examination skills and that conclusions about improvements in teaching can also be drawn from this.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anders S, Fischer-Bruegge D, Fabian M, Raupach T, Petersen-Ewert C, Harendza S (2011) Teaching post-mortem external examination in undergraduate medical education—the formal and the informal curriculum. Forensic Sci Int 210(1–3):87–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ermenc B (1999) Discrepancies between clinical and post-mortem diagnoses of causes of death. Med Sci Law 39(4):287–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lahti RA, Penttilä A (2001) The validity of death certificates: routine validation of death certification and its effects on mortality statistics. Forensic Sci Int 115(1–2):15–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karger B, Lorin de la Grandmaison G, Bajanowski T, Brinkmann B (2004) Analysis of 155 consecutive forensic exhumations with emphasis on undetected homicides. Int J Legal Med 118(2):90–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Parai JL, Kreiger N, Tomlinson G, Adlaf EM (2006) The validity of the certification of manner of death by Ontario coroners. Ann Epidemiol 16(11):805–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ravakhah K (2006) Death certificates are not reliable: revivification of the external post-mortem examination. South Med J 99(7):728–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Winkel BG, Holst AG, Theilade J, Kristensen IB, Thomsen JL, Hougen HP, Bundgaard H, Svendsen JH, Haunsø S, Tfelt-Hansen J (2012) Differences in investigations of sudden unexpected deaths in young people in a nationwide setting. Int J Legal Med 126(2):223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Minelli N, Marchetti D (2013) Discrepancies in death certificates, public health registries, and judicial determinations in Italy. J Forensic Sci 58(3):705–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brinkmann B, Banaschak S, Bratzke H, Cremer U, Drese G, Erfurt C, Giebe W, Lang C, Lange E, Peschel O, Philipp KP, Püschel K, Riße M, Tutsch-Bauer E, Vock R, Du Chesne A (1997) Fehlleistungen bei der Leichenschau in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Arch Kriminol 199(1–12):65–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Franchitto N, Rougé D (2010) Appraisal by year six French medical students of the teaching of forensic medicine and health law. Med Sci Law 50(4):205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Anders S, Mueller M, Sperhake JP, Petersen-Ewert C, Schiekirka S, Raupach T (2014) External post-mortem examination in undergraduate medical education—what do students really learn? Int J Legal Med 128(6):1031–1038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martínez-Jarreta B, Monsó E, Gascón S, Casalod Y, Abecia E, Kolb S, Reichert J, Radon K (2009) NetWoRM team. E-learning strategies in occupational legal medicine based on problem solving through "CASUS" system. Leg med (Tokyo) 11(Suppl 1):S313–S314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Albrecht UV, Folta-Schoofs K, Behrends M, von Jan U (2013) Effects of mobile augmented reality learning compared to textbook learning on medical students: randomized controlled pilot study. J med Internet Res 15(8):e182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Magalhães T, Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Santos A (2014) Teaching forensic medicine in the University of Porto. J Forensic Legal Med 25:45–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Noone PH, Raj Sharma S, Khan F, Raviraj KG, Shobhana SS (2013) Use of role play in undergraduate teaching of ethics—an experience. J Forensic Legal Med 20(3):136–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Feiser J, Bellmann D, Krämer T, Hohenberg G, Wendorf A, Wilske J (2009) Teaching legal medicine: Neukonzeption der Lehre im Fach Rechtsmedizin an der Universität des Saarlandes. GMS Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie 5(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schmeling A, Kellinghaus M, Becker JC, Schulz R, Schäfer A, Pfeiffer H (2011) A web-based e-learning programme for training external post-mortem examination in curricular medical education. Int J Legal Med 125(6):857–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heide S, Lessig R, Diers V, Rönsch M, Stoevesandt D (2016) Etablierung der Station „Leichenschau“ im SkillsLab und E-Learning. Rechtsmedizin 26 (2): 90–96

  19. Nikendei C, Jünger J (2006) OSCE-praktische Tipps zur Implementierung einer klinisch-praktischen Prüfung. GMS Z Med Ausbild 23(3):Doc47

    Google Scholar 

  20. Henssge C (1988) Death time estimation in case work. I. The rectal temperature time of death nomogram. Forensic Sci Int 38:209–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wirtz M, Caspar F (2002) Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cicchetti D (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6:284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. George D, Mallery P (2002) SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, 11.0 update. 4 ed. Allyn & Bacon, Boston

  24. Pramod Kumar GN, Sentitoshi ND, Menezes RG, Kanchan T (2015) Student’s perspectives on objective structured practical examination (OSPE) in forensic medicine—a report from India. J Forensic Legal Med 32:39–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Menezes RG, Nayak VC, Binu VS, Kanchan T, Rao PP, Baral P, Lobo SW (2011) Objective structured practical examination (OSPE) in forensic medicine: students’ point of view. J Forensic Legal Med 18(8):347–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller GE (1990) The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med 65:563–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Prince KJ, Boshuizen HP, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ (2005) Students’ opinions about their preparation for clinical practice. Med Educ 39(7):704–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Preusche I, Schmidts M, Wagner-Menghin M (2012) Twelve tips for designing and implementing a structured rater training in OSCEs. Med Teach 34(5):368–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Osail AM, Al-Sheikh MH, Al-Osail EM, Al-Ghamdi MA, Al-Hawas AM, Al-Bahussain AS, Al-Dajani AA (2015) Is Cronbach’s alpha sufficient for assessing the reliability of the OSCE for an internal medicine course? Bio Med Central Research Notes 8:582

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fisseni HJ (2004) Lehrbuch der psychologischen Diagnostik. Hogrefe, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  31. Swanson DB, Norman GR, Linn RL (1995) Performance-based assessment: lessons learnt from the health professions. Educ Res 24:5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chan J, Humphrey-Murto S, Pugh DM, Su C, Wood T (2014) The objective structured clinical examination: can physician-examiners participate from a distance? Med Educ 48(4):441–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Park SE, Kim A, Kristiansen J, Karimbux NY (2015) The influence of examiner type on dental students’ OSCE scores. J Dent Educ 79(1):89–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Forensic Medicine, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Franzosenweg 1, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany

    S. Heide, R. Lessig, V. Hachmann & D. Stiller

  2. Dorothea Erxleben Learning Centre, Medical Faculty of the Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

    M. Rönsch, D. Stoevesandt, A. Biolik & J. Kellner

  3. Clinic and Polyclinic of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Halle University Hospital, Halle, Germany

    S. Watzke

Authors
  1. S. Heide
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Lessig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Hachmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. Stiller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Rönsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Stoevesandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. Biolik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. S. Watzke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J. Kellner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Heide.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Heide, S., Lessig, R., Hachmann, V. et al. Establishment of two forensic medicine OSCE stations on the subject of external post-mortem examination. Int J Legal Med 132, 311–319 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1630-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1630-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation