Skip to main content
Log in

Blood Trace Evidence on Washed Textiles - a systematic approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 08 March 2017

Abstract

Luminol has been used for a long time for detecting latent blood traces during police investigations because it is easy to use and does not pose any health risks, while providing trace evidence for DNA analysis. It is often the method of choice for examining clothing. Clothes worn during the offense are often destroyed or washed afterwards by the offenders. The purpose of this study is to show the possibilities of blood and DNA detection on washed clothes by documenting the macroscopic results and their chemiluminescence after washing. The tests comprised different fabrics and laundry detergents including different washing and drying methods. Chemiluminescence was detected on almost all blood-marked samples (95.9%), even after all traces visible to the naked eye have been removed by washing. Evidence of a complete DNA profile or individual alleles could be confirmed in almost all of the test cases (93.3%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adair TW, Shaw RL (2005) Enhancement of bloodstains on washed clothing using luminol and LCV reagents. News (IABPA) 21:4–10

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brinkmann B, Madea B (2004) Handbuch gerichtliche Medizin 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Drösser C (2013) Soll man Blutflecken ausschließlich mit kaltem Wasser entfernen und mit heißem? Die Zeit. Ausgabe 31

  4. Gifford WD (1999) Bloodstain survival in water. IABPA News 15(2):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haeseler G, Köhn G (2010) Respiratorisches Monitoring. In: Leuwer M, Marx G, Trappe HJ, Zuzan O (eds) Checkliste Intensivmedizin, 3rd edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, p 60

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein A, Feudel E, Türk E, Püschel K, Gehl A (2007) Lumineszenz nach Luminolanwendung – Richtig- oder falschpositiv? Rechtsmedizin 17:146–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kunz SN, Adamec J, Gilg T, Kaiser C, Peschel O, Schulz MM (2012) Visualisierung latenter Blutspuren. Rechtsmedizin 22:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pex JO (2005) The use and limitations of luminol in bloodstain pattern analysis. News (IABPA) 21:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reuter P (2005) Wörterbuch Medizin, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weber K (1995) Die Anwendung der Chemolumineszenz des Luminols. Z Gerichtl Med 57:410

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolin Edler.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1569-7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edler, C., Gehl, A., Kohwagner, J. et al. Blood Trace Evidence on Washed Textiles - a systematic approach. Int J Legal Med 131, 1179–1189 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1549-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1549-y

Keywords

Navigation