Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of procaine penicillin with sulbactam-ampicillin in the treatment of peritonsillar abscesses

  • General otolaryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The clinical efficacy of procaine penicillin and sulbactam-ampicillin was compared in patients with peritonsillar abscesses after peroral abscess drainage. Forty-two patients were randomly assigned to receive either procaine penicillin or sulbactam-ampicillin intramuscularly on an outpatient basis. The mean time required for clinical symptoms (throat pain, dysphagia and fever) to resolve was compared. No statistically significant difference was found between the clinical recoveries of patients using either antibiotic (P > 0.05). The authors conclude that intramuscular procaine penicillin can be safely prescribed on an outpatient basis to most patients with peritonsillar abscess after incision and drainage. In contrast, a broader spectrum and more expensive antibiotic, such as sulbactam-ampicillin, should be reserved for non-responders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 3 October 1996 / Accepted: 26 June 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yılmaz, T., Ünal, Ö., Figen, G. et al. A comparison of procaine penicillin with sulbactam-ampicillin in the treatment of peritonsillar abscesses. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 255, 163–165 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050050035

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004050050035

Navigation