Skip to main content
Log in

Pediatric middle ear cholesteatoma: the comparative study of congenital cholesteatoma and acquired cholesteatoma

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the differences between congenital cholesteatoma (CC) and acquired cholesteatomas (AC) in children by comparing clinical features and treatment courses. This was a retrospective study which retrospectively evaluated 127 children with middle ear cholesteatomas using medical records from January 1999 to December 2012 in the Department of Otolaryngology, Niigata University Hospital. The study comprised 69 and 58 cases of CC and AC, respectively. The main outcome measures include patient backgrounds, the opportunities for consultations, mastoid cell development, intraoperative finding of stapes, surgical procedure and number of surgeries. The average age at operation was 6.4 and 9.8 years in CC and AC, respectively. AC was more prevalent in boys. Mastoid development was better in CC than in AC. We adopted a two-stage operation in 17 cases (25 %) of CC and in 22 cases (38 %) of AC. The repeat surgery rate was 11.6 % in CC and 27.6 % in AC. Three times as many operations were required for three cases (4.3 %) of CC and 10 cases (17.2 %) of AC. The lesions in AC were more difficult to control. In the treatment of pediatric middle ear cholesteatoma, we had to keep the outcome in mind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morita Y, Yamamoto Y, Oshima S et al (2014) Acquired cholesteatoma in children: clinical features and surgical outcome. Auris Nasus Larynx 41(5):417–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Corso E, Marchese MR, Scarano E et al (2006) Aural acquired cholesteatoma in children: surgical findings, recurrence and functional results. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 70(7):1269–1273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Levine JL, Wright CG, Pawlowski KD et al (1998) Postnatal persistence of epidermoid rests in the human middle ear. Laryngoscope 108(1):70–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tono T, Aoyagi M, Ito T et al (2010) Staging of middle ear Cholesteatoma 2010. Otol Jpn 20(5):743–745

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tono T (2012) Staging of middle ear cholesteatoma proposed by Japan Otological Society. The 9th international conference on cholesteatoma and ear surgery. Nagasaki, Japan

  6. Potsic WP, Korman SB, Samadi DS et al (2002) Congenital cholesteatoma: 20 years’ experience at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Otolasyngol Head Neck Surg 126(4):409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson M, Roger G, Koltai PJ et al (2002) Congenital cholesteatoma:classification, management, and outcome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(7):810–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Benhammou A, Nguyen DQ, El Makahloufi K et al (2005) Long term results of congenital middle ear cholesteatoma in children. Ann Otlaryngol Chir Cervicofac 122(3):113–119

  9. Lazarrd DS, Roger G, Denoyelle F et al (2007) Congenital cholesteatoma: risk factors for residual disease and retraction pockets—a report on 117 cases. Laryngoscope 117(4):634–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsuoka A (1994) Inflammatory middle ear diseases in children-sex differences. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 97(3):436–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kojima H, Tanaka Y, Shiwa M et al (2006) Congenital cholesteatoma clinical features and surgical results. Am J Otolaryngol 27(5):229–305

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iino Y, Imamura Y, Hiraishi M et al (1998) Mastoid pneumatization in children with congenital cholesteatoma: an aspect of the formation of open-type and closed-type cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 108(7):1071–1076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakano Y, Sato Y (1990) Prognosis of otitis media with effusion in children, and size of the mastoid air cell system. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 471:56–61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McRackan TR, Abdellatif WM, Wanna GB et al (2011) Evaluation of second look procedures for pediatric cholesteatomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 145(1):154–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nevoux J, Lenoir M, Roger G et al (2010) Childhood cholesteatoma. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 127(4):143–150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vercruysse JP, De Foer B, Somers T et al (2008) Mastoid and epitympanic bony obliteration in pediatric cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 29(7):953–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Trinidade A, Skingsley A, Yung MW (2015) Pediatric cholesteatoma surgery using single-staged canal wall down approach: results of a 5-year longitudinal study. Otol Neurotol 36(1):82–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Drahy A, Barros AD, Lerosey Y et al (2012) Acquired cholesteatoma in children: strategies and medium-term result. Eur Ann Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(5):225–229

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuka Morita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morita, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Oshima, S. et al. Pediatric middle ear cholesteatoma: the comparative study of congenital cholesteatoma and acquired cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 1155–1160 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3679-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3679-5

Keywords

Navigation