Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring the characteristics of children with obstructive adenoid responding to mometasone fuorate monohydrate: preliminary results

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed at observing the efficacy of mometasone fuorate monohydrate nasal spray on obstructive adenoids in children and identifying the characteristics of responders using a pilot study including children aged 2–11 years, with evidence of more than 50 % obstruction. Allergic rhinitis and nasal obstruction were evaluated on baseline (V0), 6- (V1), and 12-week (V2) visits. Degree of obstruction was evaluated by nasopharyngoscopy at V0 and V2. Subjects received 100 μg mometasone fuorate daily. Results were compared with those of a matching control group. Nineteen children (8 females, 11 males; 2.25–8.50 years old, mean 4.24 years, median 4.00 years) completed treatment and follow-up adequately. There was 58 % reduction in a clinical score assessing the severity of adenoidal obstruction (P < 0.05), 56 % reduction in severity of obstructive symptom (P < 0.05), and 75 % reduction in allergic rhinitis score (P < 0.05) between V0 and V1. No further significant improvement was noticed between V1 and V2. The degree of obstruction dropped from 85 to 61 % as noted on endoscopy (P < 0.05). None in the control group showed spontaneous decrease or resolution of the symptoms. Age of patients, allergic rhinitis score, and severity of the clinical score had no impact on the response parameters. No side effects were observed. Mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray appears to be effective in treating children with obstructive adenoids. The effect seems to be independent of the presence of mild intermittent allergic rhinitis, the age of patient, or the severity of symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bitar MA, Berjawi G, Youssef M, Fuleihan N (2009) How frequent is adenoid obstruction? Impact on the diagnostic approach. Pediatr Int 51(4):478–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bitar MA, Rahi A, Khalife M, Madanat LM (2006) A Suggested Clinical Score to Predict the Severity of Adenoids Obstruction. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263(10):924–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ying M (1988) Immunological basis of indications for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy. Acta Otolaryngol Stockh. 454:279–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ikinciogullari A, Dogu F (2002) ikinciogullari A, Egin Y, Babacan E. Is immune system influenced by adenotonsillectomy in children? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 66(3):251–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Linder-Aronson S, Adenoids (1970) Their effect on mode of breathing and nasal airflow and their relationship to characteristics of the facial skeleton and the dentition. A biometric, rhino-manometric and cephalometro-radiographic study on children with and without adenoids. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl Stockh. 265:1–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bachert C, van Cauwenberge P, Khaltaev N, World Health Organization (2002) Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) in collaboration with the World Health Organization. Allergy 57(9):841–855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Torrey J, Reese M (1945) Initial aerobic flora of newborn infants. AJDC 69:208–214

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mackowiak P (1982) The normal microbial flora. N Engl J Med 307:83–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brodsky L, Koch J (1993) Bacteriology and immunology of normal and diseased adenoids in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119:821–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vandenberg SJ, Heatley DG (1997) Efficacy of adenoidectomy in relieving symptoms of chronic sinusitis in children. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123(7):675–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Linder TE, Marder HP, Munzinger J (1997) Role of adenoids in the pathogenesis of otitis media: a bacteriologic and immunohistochemical analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 106(8):619–623

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berlucchi M, Salsi D, Valetti L, Parrinello G, Nicolai P (2007) The role of mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray in the treatment of adenoidal hypertrophy in the pediatric age group: preliminary results of a prospective, randomized study. Pediatrics 119(6):e1392–e1397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cengel S, Akyol MU (2006) The role of topical nasal steroids in the treatment of children with otitis media with effusion and/or adenoid hypertrophy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 70(4):639–645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Demain JG, Goetz DW (1995) Pediatric adenoidal hypertrophy and nasal airway obstruction: reduction with aqueous nasal beclomethasone. Pediatrics 95(3):355–364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chadha NK, Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, César JA (2009) Using nasal steroids to treat nasal obstruction caused by adenoid hypertrophy: does it work? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140(2):139–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldbart AD, Veling MC, Goldman JL, Li RC, Brittian KR, Gozal D (2005) Glucocorticoid receptor subunit expression in adenotonsillar tissue of children with obstructive sleep apnea. Pediatr Res 57(2):232–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schenkel EJ, Skoner DP, Bronsky EA, Miller SD, Pearlman DS, Rooklin A et al (2000) Absence of growth retardation in children with perennial allergic rhinitis after one year of treatment with mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray. Pediatrics 105(2):22

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors and sponsors would like to thank and acknowledge the valued contribution of the following primary health care physicians: Bassem Abu Merhi, MD; Zeinab Tahsh, MD; Mohamed Arab, MD; Bilan Yaman, MD; and Ali El-Ghoul, MD. This study was sponsored by Schering-Plough Levant, a subsidiary of Schering-Plough pharmaceutical.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed A. Bitar.

Additional information

L. Mahfoud, J. Nassar and R. Dana are currently in private practice in Lebnaon. Trial registration number: P04367; Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT00553891.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bitar, M.A., Mahfoud, L., Nassar, J. et al. Exploring the characteristics of children with obstructive adenoid responding to mometasone fuorate monohydrate: preliminary results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 931–937 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2155-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2155-8

Keywords

Navigation