Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of oral trigeminal sensitivity in humans

  • Miscellaneous
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to establish a clinical test for the assessment of oral trigeminal sensitivity. Capsaicin-impregnated filter paper strips (five concentrations: 0.0001–1%) were used to measure trigeminal thresholds. The strips were placed on the anterior tongue for 10 s. Subjects were asked to report the onset of any sensory perception, quality and duration of sensory perception. Thresholds were estimated in two ways: (1) threshold (THR1) related to sensory perception and (2) intensity related threshold (THR2). The test was applied to 63 healthy subjects (mean age 40 years; 34 women, 29 men). For whole-mouth testing with capsaicin, a small but significant correlation was found between THR1 and THR2 (r 63 = 0.41). Coefficients of correlation between test and re-test were r 30 = 0.60 for THR1 and r 30 = 0.78 THR2. Neither THR1 nor THR2 indicated either side or sex-related differences. Age-related differences were only found in THR2 scores, which were lower in young subjects (<40 years). Reliable assessment of intraoral trigeminal sensitivity appears to be possible using the presently described technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aviv JE, Hecht C, Weinberg H, Dalton JF, Urken ML (1992) Surface sensibility of the floor of the mouth and tongue in healthy controls and in radiated patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 107:418–423

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Caterina MJ, Schumacher MA, Tominaga M, Rosen TA, Levine JD, Julius D (1997) The capsaicin receptor: a heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature 389:816–824

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Frasnelli J, Hummel T (2003) Age-related decline of intranasal trigeminal sensitivity: is it a peripheral event? Brain Res 987:201–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fukunaga A, Uematsu H, Sugimoto K (2005) Influences of aging on taste perception and oral somatic sensation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:109–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Green BG (1985) Sensory interaction between capsaicin and temperature in the oral cavity. Chem Senses 11:371–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Green BG, Schullery MT (2003) Stimulation of bitterness by capsaicin and menthol: differences between lingual areas innervated by the glossopharyngeal and chorda tympani nerves. Chem Senses 28:45–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Just T, Pau HW, Witt M, Hummel T (2006) Contact endoscopic comparison of morphology of human fungiform papillae of healthy subjects and patients with transected chorda tympani nerve. Laryngoscope 116:1216–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu L, Simon SA (1996) Similarities and differences in the currents activated by capsaicin, piperine, and zingerone in rat trigeminal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 76:1858–1869

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu L, Simon SA (2001) Acidic stimuli activates two distinct pathways in taste receptor cells from rat fungiform papillae. Brain Res 923:58–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller SL, Mirza N, Doty RL (2002) Electrogustometric thresholds: relationship to anterior tongue locus, area of stimulation, and number of fungiform papillae. Physiol Behav 75:753–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mueller C, Kallert S, Renner B, Stiassny K, Temmel AF, Hummel T, Kobal G (2003) Quantitative assessment of gustatory function in a clinical context using impregnated “taste strips”. Rhinology 41:2–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Murphy C, Quinonez C, Nordin S (1995) Reliability and validity of electrogustometry and its application to young and elderly persons. Chem Senses 20:499–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nomura T, Ogawa H (1985) The taste and mechanical response properties of neurons in the parvicellular part of the thalamic posteromedial ventral nucleus of the rat. Neurosci Res 3:91–105

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ogawa H, Imoto T, Hayama T (1984) Responsiveness of solitario-parabrachial relay neurons to taste and mechanical stimulation applied to the oral cavity in rats. Exp Brain Res 54:349–358

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Perez R, Fuoco G, Dorion JM, Ho PH, Chen JM (2006) Does the chorda tympani nerve confer general sensation from the tongue? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135:368–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Renton T, Thexton A, Hankins M, McGurk M (2003) Quantitative thermosensory testing of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves in health and after iatrogenic injury. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:36–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Santamaria E, Wei FC, Chen IH, Chuang DC (1999) Sensation recovery on innervated radial forearm flap for hemiglossectomy reconstruction by using different recipient nerves. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:450–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schiffman SS, Zervakis J (2002) Taste and smell perception in the elderly: effect of medications and disease. Adv Food Nutr Res 44:247–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Simons CT, O’Mahony M, Carstens E (2002) Taste suppression following lingual capsaicin pre-treatment in humans. Chem Senses 27:353–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sostman AL, Simon SA (1991) Trigeminal nerve responses in the rat elicited by chemical stimulation of the tongue. Arch Oral Biol 36:95–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stillman JA, Morton RP, Hay KD, Ahmad Z, Goldsmith D (2003) Electrogustometry: strengths, weaknesses, and clinical evidence of stimulus boundaries. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 28:406–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Rostock, Doberaner Strasse 137-139, 18057, Rostock, Germany

    Tino Just, Hans Wilhelm Pau & Susanne Steiner

  2. Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Dresden University of Technology Medical School, Dresden, Germany

    Thomas Hummel

Authors
  1. Tino Just
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hans Wilhelm Pau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susanne Steiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas Hummel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tino Just.

Additional information

Portions of the results were presented at the 28th meeting of Association for Chemosensory Sciences in Sarasota, Fl, April 2006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Just, T., Pau, H.W., Steiner, S. et al. Assessment of oral trigeminal sensitivity in humans. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264, 545–551 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0218-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006-0218-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation