Skip to main content
Log in

Positive results bias in randomized controlled trials in gynecologic oncology

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Availability of data and material

Will be provided by demand.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Cherpak LA et al (2019) Publication bias: association of diagnostic accuracy in radiology conference abstracts with full-text publication. Radiology 292(1):120–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dalton JE, Bolen SD, Mascha EJ (2016) Publication bias: the elephant in the review. Anesth Analg 123(4):812–813

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dick A et al (2022) Impact factor bias in randomized controlled trials in obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 4(5):100680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaver JA et al (2019) Advancing drug development in gynecologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 25(16):4874–4880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tang PA et al (2014) Factors associated with publication of randomized phase iii cancer trials in journals with a high impact factor. Curr Oncol 21(4):e564–e572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding was used in the conduct of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission. GL, TP and LK: Conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation and methodology, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. LM, BB and RM: data acquisition, investigation, drafting and revising.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Levin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

No ethical approval was needed by the institutional review board as this study analyzed only published available public data.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levin, G., Kogan, L., Matan, L. et al. Positive results bias in randomized controlled trials in gynecologic oncology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 309, 1681–1683 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07099-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07099-1

Navigation