Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Iatrogenic bladder and ureteral injuries following gynecological and obstetric surgery

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Key message

Ureteral injuries are often associated with complications and risk of fistula especially in case of malignancy. Length of catheterization should be reconsidered according to the injury.

Abstract

Purpose

Iatrogenic urinary tract injuries are potential complications of gynecologic and obstetric surgery. Our aim was to describe suture type and size, length of urethral catheterization, length of hospitalization, reoperation rate, follow-up, and impact on quality of life following iatrogenic bladder and ureteral injury.

Methods

In total, 81 women met inclusion criteria. Bladder injuries included 55 women, ureteral injuries in 23 women, and three women had bladder and ureteral injuries.

Results

Most bladder injuries were managed by a two-layer suture followed by transurethral catheterization for 11.4 days (95% CI 9.1–13.6). The most frequent suture type was 3.0 Vicryl in all subgroups. In total, 30.4% of ureteral injuries were managed by neoimplantation followed by ureteral stenting for 38.0 days (95% CI 22.0–54.0) and transurethral catheterization for 16.9 days (95% CI 5.3–28.4), or by ureteral stenting for 46.7 days (95% CI 31.5–61.2) and transurethral catheterization for 6.25 days (95% CI 1.0–13.5).

Altogether, 25 (30.9%) women underwent a reoperation mostly due to ureteral injury (68%). In total six women developed a fistula, of whom five had malignant surgery.

Multiple linear regression showed a statistically significant increased median length of urethral catheterization when the duration of surgery increased.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates a high reoperation rate, and a high fistula rate in case of malignancy. Length of catheterization was high even in case of benign surgery, however, only one woman developed a fistula in the benign group, suggesting a reduction in catheterization length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wong JMK, Bortoletto P, Tolentino J, Jung MJ, Milad MP (2018) Urinary tract injury in gynecologic laparoscopy for benign indication: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 131:100–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aydin C, Mercimek MN (2020) Laparoscopic management of bladder injury during total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Clin Pract 74:e13507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oliphant SS, Bochenska K, Tolge ME, Catov JM, Zyczynski HM (2014) Maternal lower urinary tract injury at the time of cesarean delivery. Int Urogynecol J 25:1709–1714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gilmour DT, Das S, Flowerdew G (2006) Rates of urinary tract injury from gynecologic surgery and the role of intraoperative cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 107:1366–1372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yossepowitch O, Baniel J, Livne PM (2004) Urological injuries during cesarean section: intraoperative diagnosis and management. J Urol 172:196–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Esparaz AM, Pearl JA, Herts BR, LeBlanc J, Kapoor B (2015) Iatrogenic urinary tract injuries: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Semin Intervent Radiol 32:195–208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Adelman MR, Bardsley TR, Sharp HT (2014) Urinary tract injuries in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:558–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sahai A, Ali A, Barratt R, Belal M, Biers S, Hamid R et al (2021) British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) consensus document: management of bladder and ureteric injury. BJU Int 128:539–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahman MS, Gasem T, Al Suleiman SA, Al Jama FE, Burshaid S, Rahman J (2009) Bladder injuries during cesarean section in a University Hospital: a 25-year review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 279:349–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chamsy D, King C, Lee T (2015) The use of barbed suture for bladder and bowel repair. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22:648–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan JK, Morrow J, Manetta A (2003) Prevention of ureteral injuries in gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1273–1277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rao D, Yu H, Zhu H, Duan P (2012) The diagnosis and treatment of iatrogenic ureteral and bladder injury caused by traditional gynaecology and obstetrics operation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 28:763–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. eBoks. e-boks.com. https://www.e-boks.com/danmark/en/what-is-e-boks/ Accessed 11.10.2021.

  14. Guldberg R, Brostrøm S, Hansen JK, Kærlev L, Gradel KO, Nørgård BM et al (2013) The Danish urogynaecological database: establishment, completeness and validity. Int Urogynecol J 24:983–990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Clausen J, Gimbel H, Arenholt LTS, Løwenstein E (2021) Validity and reliability of two Danish versions of the ICIQ-UI SF. Int Urogynecol J 32:3223–3233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. von Elm E AD, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2021) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. equator-network. https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/strobe/. Accessed 27 Sep 2021.

  17. Gungorduk K, Asicioglu O, Celikkol O, Sudolmus S, Ark C (2010) Iatrogenic bladder injuries during caesarean delivery: a case control study. J Obstet Gynaecol 30:667–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, Weitzen S, Myers DL (2005) Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 105:156–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Naicker S, Naidoo TD, Moodley J (2020) Obstetric-associated lower urinary tract injuries: a case series from a tertiary centre in a low-resource setting. Case Rep Womens Health 27:e00218

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ebert JF, Huibers L, Christensen B, Christensen MB (2018) Paper- or web-based questionnaire invitations as a method for data collection: cross-sectional comparative study of differences in response rate, completeness of data, and financial cost. J Med Internet Res 20:e24

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Open Patient data Explorative Network for the possibility to register and store data in the database. Furthermore, for statistical advice.

Funding

No financial support was given to the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AJ: Project development, data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing; MR: Protocol/Project development, manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Rudnicki.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jensen, AS., Rudnicki, M. Iatrogenic bladder and ureteral injuries following gynecological and obstetric surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 307, 511–518 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06800-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06800-0

Keywords

Navigation