Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In vitro characteristics of intravaginal Lactobacilli; why is L. iners detected in abnormal vaginal microbial flora?

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Our purpose is to investigate the reasons why Lactobacillus iners is detected in abnormal vaginal microbial flora.

Methods

In this study, in vitro characteristics of four type strains (L. crispatus, L. iners, L. gasseri, and L. jensenii) were examined by measuring the growth speed by OD660, and acid resistance, with gram stain and Live/Dead stain.

Results

The growth speed was L. gasseri > L. jensenii > L. crispatus > L. iners. Bacterial counts of all Lactobacilli in MRS medium began to decrease at the middle of the log-phase of the growth curve. In addition, L. iners grew to 106 CFU/mL and the others grew to 108 CFU/mL. L. iners was mostly Gram-negative with very short rod, while the others were mostly Gram-positive rods. L. iners was completely killed in the pH 3 medium, however, the others grew (in pH 3 medium) in 1/100 order compared with those in the pH 6 medium.

Conclusion

L. iners was not a typical gram-positive long rod Lactobacilli and presented weak acid-resistance. The reasons why L. iners is detected in abnormal vaginal microbial flora were presumed to be due to the unique morphologic and microbiologic characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoshimura K, Morotomi N, Fukuda K, Nakano M, Kashimura M, Hachisuga T, Taniguchi H (2011) Intravaginal microbial flora by the 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205(3):235 e231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.04.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Catallozzi M, Fraiz LD, Hargreaves KM, Zimet GD, Stanberry LR, Ratner AJ, Gelber SE, Rosenthal SL (2017) Pregnant women's attitudes about topical microbicides for the prevention and treatment of bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy. Int J STD AIDS 28(9):881–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462416679067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL (1991) Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 29(2):297–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kiss H, Petricevic L, Husslein P (2004) Prospective randomised controlled trial of an infection screening programme to reduce the rate of preterm delivery. BMJ 329(7462):371. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38169.519653.EB

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mohammadzadeh F, Dolatian M, Jorjani M, Alavi Majd H (2014) Diagnostic value of Amsel's clinical criteria for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Glob J Health Sci 7(3):8–14. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferris MJ, Norori J, Zozaya-Hinchliffe M, Martin DH (2007) Cultivation-independent analysis of changes in bacterial vaginosis flora following metronidazole treatment. J Clin Microbiol 45(3):1016–1018. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02085-06

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jakobsson T, Forsum U (2007) Lactobacillus iners: a marker of changes in the vaginal flora? J Clin Microbiol 45(9):3145. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00558-07

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamont RF, Sobel JD, Akins RA, Hassan SS, Chaiworapongsa T, Kusanovic JP, Romero R (2011) The vaginal microbiome: new information about genital tract flora using molecular based techniques. BJOG 118(5):533–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02840.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Petrova MI, Reid G, Vaneechoutte M, Lebeer S (2017) Lactobacillus iners: Friend or Foe? Trends Microbiol 25(3):182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2016.11.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Döderlein A (1892) Das Scheidensekret und seine Bedeutung für das Puerperalfieber. Besold, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  11. Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Claeys G, Verschraegen G, Van Simaey L, De Ganck C, De Backer E, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M (2005) Comparison between Gram stain and culture for the characterization of vaginal microflora: definition of a distinct grade that resembles grade I microflora and revised categorization of grade I microflora. BMC Microbiol 5:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-5-61

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Marrazzo JM (2005) Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med 353(18):1899–1911. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043802

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vasquez A, Jakobsson T, Ahrne S, Forsum U, Molin G (2002) Vaginal lactobacillus flora of healthy Swedish women. J Clin Microbiol 40(8):2746–2749. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.40.8.2746-2749.2002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Borgdorff H, Tsivtsivadze E, Verhelst R, Marzorati M, Jurriaans S, Ndayisaba GF, Schuren FH, van de Wijgert JH (2014) Lactobacillus-dominated cervicovaginal microbiota associated with reduced HIV/STI prevalence and genital HIV viral load in African women. ISME J 8(9):1781–1793. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Falsen E, Pascual C, Sjoden B, Ohlen M, Collins MD (1999) Phenotypic and phylogenetic characterization of a novel Lactobacillus species from human sources: description of Lactobacillus iners sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49(Pt 1):217–221. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-49-1-217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Backer E, Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Alqumber MA, Burton JP, Tagg JR, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M (2007) Quantitative determination by real-time PCR of four vaginal Lactobacillus species, Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae indicates an inverse relationship between L. gasseri and L. iners. BMC Microbiol 7:115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-7-115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KY: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing/editing; MO and MS: project development. All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by KY and MO. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KY and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuaki Yoshimura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This paper does not contain any studies with human nor animals.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoshimura, K., Ogawa, M. & Saito, M. In vitro characteristics of intravaginal Lactobacilli; why is L. iners detected in abnormal vaginal microbial flora?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 302, 671–677 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05634-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05634-y

Keywords

Navigation