Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy of dienogest in improving pain in women with endometriosis: a 12-month single-center experience

  • Review
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Dienogest has recently been marketed as a medical treatment for endometriosis. Given the recent introduction on the market of Dienogest, little data are available regarding its effectiveness in routine clinical practice.

Methods

The study is an observational, single-center, cohort study. Eligible was women with a surgical diagnosis of endometriosis dating back <24 months or a clinical/instrumental diagnosis of endometriosis and endometriosis-associated pelvic pain score of at least 40 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) at start of treatment and who had been taking Dienogest 2 mg once daily treatment at the time of study entry for no more than 30 days, consecutively observed between September 2013 to September 2014. In accordance with routine practice, women came back for clinical assessment and evaluation of pain after 1 (V1), 3 (V2), and 12 (V3) months.

Results

A total of 132 women were enrolled in the study. A total of 21 of the enrolled patients were released from the study during follow-up due to adverse effects. The mean pelvic pain VAS score at baseline was 8.9 (SD 1.3). The corresponding values were 6.7 (SD 3.2) and 5.7 (SD 3.7) for dyspareunia and dyschezia. The mean VAS scores progressively and significantly decreased to 0.9 (SD 1.6) for pelvic pain, 1.4 (SD 2.1) for dyspareunia and 0.2 (SD 0.9) for dyschezia, respectively, 12 months after start of treatment.

Conclusion

This study confirms that in routine clinical practice, Dienogest 2 mg is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for endometriosis-related pain in women with endometriosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andres Mde P, Lopes LA, Baracat EC, Podgaec S (2015) Dienogest in the treatment of endometriosis: systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:523–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Doyle JO, Missmer SA, Laufer MR (2009) The effect of combined surgical-medical intervention on the progression of endometriosis in an adolescent and young adult population. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 22:257–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Exacoustos C, Malzoni M, Di Giovanni A, Lazzeri L, Tosti C, Petraglia F, Zupi E (2014) Ultrasound mapping system for the surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril 102(143–150):e142

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fawzy M, Mesbah Y (2015) Comparison of dienogest versus triptorelin acetate in premenopausal women with adenomyosis: a prospective clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:1267–1271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedl F, Riedl D, Fessler S, Wildt L, Walter M, Richter R, Schussler G, Bottcher B (2015) Impact of endometriosis on quality of life, anxiety, and depression: an Austrian perspective. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:1393–1399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harada T, Momoeda M, Taketani Y, Aso T, Fukunaga M, Hagino H, Terakawa N (2009) Dienogest is as effective as intranasal buserelin acetate for the relief of pain symptoms associated with endometriosis–a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 91:675–681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hudelist G, English J, Thomas AE, Tinelli A, Singer CF, Keckstein J (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for non-invasive diagnosis of bowel endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:257–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kohler G, Faustmann TA, Gerlinger C, Seitz C, Mueck AO (2010) A dose-ranging study to determine the efficacy and safety of 1, 2, and 4 mg of dienogest daily for endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 108:21–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leyland N, Casper R, Laberge P, Singh SS, SOGC (2010) Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 32:S1–S32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luciano DE, Luciano AA (2011) Management of endometriosis-related pain: an update. Womens Health (Lond) 7:585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Luisi S, Parazzini F, Angioni S, Arena S, Beretta P, Candiani M, Cela V, Fedele L, Litta P, Maiorana A, Nappi L, Porpora MG, Rosati M, Zullo F, Tosti C, Petraglia F (2015) Dienogest treatment improves quality of life in women with endometriosis. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord 7(4):124–128

    Google Scholar 

  12. Momoeda M, Harada T, Terakawa N, Aso T, Fukunaga M, Hagino H, Taketani Y (2009) Long-term use of dienogest for the treatment of endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 35:1069–1076

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore J, Copley S, Morris J, Lindsell D, Golding S, Kennedy S (2002) A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 20:630–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Muzii L, di Tucci C, Achilli C, Benedetti Panici P (2015) Continuous versus cyclic oral contraceptives for endometriosis: any conclusive evidence? Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:477–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Petraglia F, Hornung D, Seitz C, Faustmann T, Gerlinger C, Luisi S, Lazzeri L, Strowitzki T (2012) Reduced pelvic pain in women with endometriosis: efficacy of long-term dienogest treatment. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:167–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Savelli L, Manuzzi L, Pollastri P, Mabrouk M, Seracchioli R, Venturoli S (2009) Diagnostic accuracy and potential limitations of transvaginal sonography for bladder endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:595–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Streuli I, de Ziegler D, Santulli P, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Batteux F, Chapron C (2013) An update on the pharmacological management of endometriosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 14:291–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Strowitzki T, Faustmann T, Gerlinger C, Seitz C (2010) Dienogest in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 151:193–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Strowitzki T, Marr J, Gerlinger C, Faustmann T, Seitz C (2010) Dienogest is as effective as leuprolide acetate in treating the painful symptoms of endometriosis: a 24-week, randomized, multicentre, open-label trial. Hum Reprod 25:633–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Troncon JK, Poli-Neto OB, Nogueira AA, Rosa ESJC (2015) Continuous or cyclic contraceptives for endometriosis: a question still without an answer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:481–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vercellini P, Pietropaolo G, De Giorgi O, Pasin R, Chiodini A, Crosignani PG (2005) Treatment of symptomatic rectovaginal endometriosis with an estrogen-progestogen combination versus low-dose norethindrone acetate. Fertil Steril 84:1375–1387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vercellini P, Somigliana E, Consonni D, Frattaruolo MP, De Giorgi O, Fedele L (2012) Surgical versus medical treatment for endometriosis-associated severe deep dyspareunia: I. Effect on pain during intercourse and patient satisfaction. Hum Reprod 27:3450–3459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vercellini P, Bracco B, Mosconi P, Roberto A, Alberico D, Dhouha D, Somigliana E (2016) Norethindrone acetate or dienogest for the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis: a before and after study. Fertil Steril 105(734–743):e733

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zorbas KA, Economopoulos KP, Vlahos NF (2015) Continuous versus cyclic oral contraceptives for the treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:37–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Petraglia F, Hornung D, Seitz C, Faustmann T, Gerlinger C, Luisi S, Lazzeri L, Strowitzki T (2012) Reduced pelvic pain in women with endometriosis: efficacy of long-term dienogest treatment. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(1):167–173. doi:10.1007/s00404-011-1941-7 (epub 2011 Jun 17)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fawzy Mesbah (2015) Comparison of dienogest versus triptorelin acetate in premenopausal women with adenomyosis: a prospective clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292(6):1267–1271. doi:10.1007/s00404-015-3755-5 (Epub 2015 May 20)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AM: project development. DI: data collection or management and manuscript writing/editing. FP: data analysis. WA: manuscript writing/editing. AM: manuscript writing/editing. LG: manuscript writing/editing. LA: project development.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Domenico Incandela.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

FP received fee by Bayer SpA for participation to Editorial Board. The other authors declare that they are no conflict of interest. All authors have full control of all primary data and that they agree to allow the Journal to review their data if requested.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maiorana, A., Incandela, D., Parazzini, F. et al. Efficacy of dienogest in improving pain in women with endometriosis: a 12-month single-center experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet 296, 429–433 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4442-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4442-5

Keywords

Navigation