Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cervicovaginal anastomosis by Gore-Tex in Mullerian agenesis

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine usage of polytetrafluoroethylene, Gore-Tex, as a stent in patients with congenital cervicovaginal agenesis.

Design

Follow-up study.

Setting

Tertiary center referral hospital.

Patients

Eight patients with Mullerian agenesis who had congenital cervical agenesis, associated with partial or complete vaginal aplasia.

Interventions

Laparoscopic uterovaginal anastomosis with placement of a polytetrafluoroethylene stent for reconstruction of cervical agenesis. In cases associated with vaginal agenesis, modified McIndoe vaginoplasty was done concomitantly.

Measurements and main results

Eight patients with cervical agenesis who had partial and complete vaginal aplasia underwent vaginoplasty. Mean (SD) follow-up after surgery (3 years old). All patients except three of them, (62.5 %) experienced relief of abdominal pain and regular menstruation. Due to ascending infection three of them (37.5 %) needed reoperation. So, they underwent laparotomy. Two of these three patients had total abdominal hysterectomy and one case tolerated resection of right obstructed side of didelphys uterus, then she became pregnant spontaneously. Four out of these eight cases were married and the others were single. One out of our married patients conceived three times. Her first pregnancy was aborted. She delivered two alive babies after inserting transabdominal Shirodkar suture in her other pregnancies.

Conclusion

Uterovaginal anastomosis assisted laparoscopy with polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) is effective and hopeful to relieve patients’ symptoms, menstruation regularity, and saving fertility. If ascending infection threatening health happens, hysterectomy will be recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions (1988) Fertil Steril 49: 944–955

  2. Rock JA (2008) Breech LL Surgery for the anomalies of the Mullerian ducts. In: Rock JA, Jones HW (eds) Telinde’s operative gynecology, 10th edn. kluwer/Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia (Figure 29.16)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rock JA, Roberts CP, Jones HW (2010) Congenital anomalies of the uterine cervix: lessons from 30 cases managed clinically by a common protocol. Fertil Steril 94(5):1858–1863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee CL, Wang CJ, Liu YH, Yen CF, Lai YL, Soong YK (1999) Laparoscopically assisted full thickness skin graft for reconstruction in congenital agenesis of vagina and uterine cervix. Hum Reprod 14:928–9230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maciulla GJ, Heine MW, Christian CD (1978) Functional endometrial tissue with vaginal agenesis. J Repord Med 21(6):373–376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Niver DH, Barrette G, Jewelewicz R (1980) Congenital atresia of the uterine cervix and vagina; three cases. Fertil Steril 33:25–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McAuley CE, Steed DL, Webster MW (1984) Seven-year follow-up of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) femoropopliteal bypass grafts. Ann Surg 199:57–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giannico S, Hammad F, Amodeo A et al (2006) Clinical outcome of 193 extracardiac fontan patients: the first 15 years. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(10):2065–2073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wells W, Malas M, Baker CJ, Quardt SM, Barr ML (2003) Depopulated vena caval homograft: a new venous conduit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126(2):498–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cukier J, Batzofin JH, Conners JS et al (1986) Genital tract reconstruction in a patient with congenital absence of a vagina and hypoplasia of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 68:32S–36S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rock JA, Jones HW (2008) Telinde’s operative gynecology, 10th edn. kluwer/Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  12. Selvaggi G, Monstrey S, Depypere H, Blondeel P, Van LK, Hamdi M et al (2003) Creation of a neovagina with use of a pudendal thigh fasciocutaneous flap and restoration of uterovaginal continuity. Fertil Steril 80:607–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gurlek A, Aslan SS, Frat C, Ozturk-Ersoz A, Burak F (2008) Combined cervical or vaginal reconstruction with prefabricated pudendal thigh flap in a case with cervical and vaginal agenesis (MURCS syndrome): a new and original technique. Ann Plast Surg 61:88–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hou CF, Wanf CJ, Lee CL, Chen HC, Soong YK (2008) Free microvasculr transfer of the vermiform appendix and colon for creation of a uterovaginal fistula: a new technique for cervicovaginal reconstruction. Fertil Steril 89:228.e1–228.e11

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hurst BS (1999) Permanent implantation of expanded polytetraflouroethylene is safe for pelvic surgery, United States Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Reproductive Surgery Study Group. Hum Reprod 14:925–927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Deffarges JV, Haddad B, Musset R, Paniel BJ (2001) Utero-vaginal anastomosis in women with uterine cervix atresia: long-term follow-up and reproductive performance. A study of 18 cases. Hum Reprod 16:1722–1725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee CL, Wang CJ, Liu YH, Yen CF, Soong YK (1999) Laparoscopic hemi-hysterectomy in treatment of a didelphic uterus with a hypoplastic cervix and obstructed hemivagina. Hum Reprod 14:1741–1743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Creighton SM, Davies MC, Cutner A (2006) Laparoscopic management of cervical agenesis. Fertil Steril 85:1510–1515

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G et al (2008) Laparoscopically assisted uterovestibular anastomosis in patients with uterine cervix atresia and vaginal aplasia. Fertil Steril 89:212–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kriplani A, Kachhawaa G, Awasthi D, Kulshrestha V (2012) Laparoscopy-assisted uterovaginal anastomosis in congenital atresia of uterine cervix: follow-up study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen DH, Lee CL, Wu KY, Cheng MH (2011) A novel approach to cervical reconstruction using vaginal mucosa-lined polytetrafluoroethylene graft in congenital agenesis of cervix. Fertil Steril 95:2433.e5–2433.e8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Casey AC, Laufer MR (1997) Cervical agenesis: septic death after surgery. Obstet Gynecol 90:706–707

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roberts CP, Rock JA (2011) Surgical methods in the treatment of congenital anomalies of the uterine cervix. 23: 251–257

  24. Herrera FA, Kohanzadeh S, Nasseri Y, Kansal N, Owens EL, Bodor R (2009) Management of vascular graft infections with soft tissue flap coverage: improving limb salvage rates- a veterans affairs experience. Am Surg 75:877–881

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank our reviewers for their helpful comments.

Conflict of interest

No actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azizeh Omidvar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rezaei, Z., Omidvar, A., Niroumanesh, S. et al. Cervicovaginal anastomosis by Gore-Tex in Mullerian agenesis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291, 467–472 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3442-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3442-y

Keywords

Navigation