Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modified LeFort colpocleisis: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to determine the anatomical and functional outcomes, as well as patients’ satisfaction and morbidity associated with modified LeFort colpocleisis.

Study design

Between 7/2007 and 6/2011 58 patients underwent a modified LeFort colpocleisis. Thirty-eight were available for follow-up visit. Records were reviewed for patients’ characteristics, operative data and incidence of complications. The follow-up visit comprised a medical history and a gynecological examination. A visual-analog-scale to assess patients’ quality of life after surgery was used. The patients were asked: “Would you again choose to have this surgery performed?” and “Do you regret choosing to have a vaginal closure procedure?” Statistical analysis was performed using R version 2.12.1, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

Results

There were no treatment failures within a mean follow-up of 14 months (range 3–41 months). 89 % of patients reported an improved quality of life postoperatively. No complications occurred intraoperatively and none of the patients regretted the loss of sexual function. All patients stated that they would choose to have the colpocleisis procedure again. Postoperatively 8 urinary tract infections, 2 hematomas and 1 pyometra occurred. Two patients complained about stress urinary incontinence and another one about an overactive bladder.

Conclusion

The study highlights an additional safe and effective option for an individualized treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FitzGerald MP, Richter HE, Siddique S, Thompson P, Zyczynski H, Weber A (2006) Colpocleisis review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(3):261–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reisenauer C, Wallwiener W (2011) Treatment of recurrent vaginal eversion after previous Le Fort colpocleisis. Int J Gynecol Obstet 114(2):161–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K et al (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adair FL, DaSef L (1936) The LeFort colpocleisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 32:218–226

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roth TM (2007) Pyometra and recurrent prolapse after LeFort colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J 18(6):687–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoskey KA, Shippey SH, Handa VL (2012) Surgical repair of recurrent prolapse after LeFort colpocleisis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 23:371–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. FitzGerald MP, Kulkarni N, Fenner D (2000) Postoperative resolution of urinary retention in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1361–1364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenzweig BA, Pushkin S, Blumenfeld D, Bhatia N (1992) Prevalence of abnormal urodynamic test results in continent women with severe genitourinary prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 79:539–542

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest. The study was not sponsored. Authors have had full control of all primary data and they agree to allow the Journal to review their data if requested.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christl Reisenauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reisenauer, C., Oberlechner, E., Schoenfisch, B. et al. Modified LeFort colpocleisis: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288, 1349–1353 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2930-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2930-9

Keywords

Navigation