Skip to main content
Log in

Timing and risk factors of maternal complications of cesarean section

  • Materno-fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the timing and risk factors of maternal complications of cesarean section (CS).

Methods

Review of the files of all women who underwent CS at a tertiary medical center between September 2007 and December 2008 yielded 100 patients with postpartum complications. Their clinical and surgery-related characteristics were compared with 100 women with uncomplicated CS operated in January 2009. Complications were analyzed by prevalence and time of occurrence.

Results

The only between-group difference in background factors was a higher rate of obesity (BMI > 30) in the controls. The complication rate was 5.7%. The most common complication was endomyometritis (3.6%), followed by wound infection (1.8%) and wound hematoma (1.2%). In most cases, endomyometritis was diagnosed on postoperative days 2–3 and wound complications on days 2–5; 7 of the 9 readmissions occurred on postoperative days 5–6. On multivariate analysis, significant independent predictors of postoperative complications were surgeon experience (OR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.2–4.8) and intra-partum CS (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.1–4.3).

Conclusion

Cesarean section performed by a resident or during active labor is associated with an increased risk of postpartum complications. Medical teams should be alert to morbidity in women at risk, particularly during the first 4 days after CS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curtin SC, Park MM (1999) Trends in the attendant, place, and timing of births, and in the use of obstetric interventions: United States, 1989–1997. National Vital Health Statistics Reports, vol 47. No 27. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD

    Google Scholar 

  2. (1991) US Public Health Service: Maternal and Child Health Bureau. Publication No. HRSA-M-CH 91-2. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services

  3. Gabbe SG (2002) Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cunningham F, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL (2005) Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. In: Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom N, Hauth J, Gilstrap L, Wenstrom K (eds) Williams obstetrics, 22nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 587–606

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burrows LJ, Meyn LA, Weber AM (2004) Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 103:907–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Petitti DB (1985) Maternal mortality and morbidity in cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 28:763–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frigoletto FD Jr, Ryan KJ, Phillippe M (1980) Maternal mortality rate associated with cesarean section: an appraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136:969–970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sachs BP, Yeh J, Acker D, Driscoll S, Brown DA, Jewett JP (1988) Cesarean section-related maternal mortality in Massachusetts, 1954–1985. Obstet Gynecol 71:385–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hofmeyr GJ, Smaill FM (2010) Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20(1):CD000933

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duff P (1986) Pathophysiology and management of postcesarean endomyometritis. Obstet Gynecol 67:269–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwartz WH, Grolle K (1981) The use of prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. A review of the literature. J Reprod Med 26:595–609

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cunningham FG, Hauth JC, Strong JD, Kapus SS (1978) Infectious morbidity following cesarean: comparison of two treatment regimens. Obstet Gynecol 52:656–661

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Goepfert A (2001) The MFMU Cesarean Registry: infectious morbidity following primary cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:S192 (SMFM abstract #410)

  14. Myles DT, Gooch J (2002) Obesity as an independent risk factor for infectious morbidity in patients who undergo cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 100(5):959–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nielsen TF, Hökegård KH (1983) Postoperative cesarean section morbidity: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 146:911–916

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chaim W, Bashiri A, Bar-David J, Shoham-Vardi I, Mazor M (2000) Prevalence and clinical significance of postpartum endometritis and wound infection. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 8:77–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Owen J, Andrews WW (1994) Wound complications after cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynecol 27:842–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrews WW, Sibai BM, Thom EA, Dudley D, Ernst J, McNellis D, Leveno KJ, Wapner R, Moawad A, O’Sullivan MJ et al (2003) Randomized clinical trial of metronidazole plus erythromycin to prevent spontaneous preterm delivery in fetal fibronectin-positive women. Obstet Gynecol 101:847–855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneid-Kofman N, Sheiner E (2005) Risk factors for wound infection following cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 90:10–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Martens MG, Kolrud BL (1995) Development of wound infection or separation after cesarean delivery. J Reprod Med 40(3):171–175

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McNeeley SG Jr, Hendrix SL, Bennett SM, Singh A, Ransom BB, Kmak DC, Morley GW (1998) Synthetic graft placement in the treatment of fascial dehiscence with necrosis and infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1430–1435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, Easterling TR (2000) Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalization. JAMA 283(18):2411–2416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hawrylyshyn PA, Bernstein P, Papsin FR (1981) Risk factors associated with infection following cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 139:294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Usha Kiran TS, Hemmadi S (2005) Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index. BJOG 112:768–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schutte JM, Steegers EAP, Santema JG, Schuitemaker NW, van Roosemalen J (2007) Maternal Mortality Committee of the Netherland Society of Obstetrics. Maternal deaths after elective cesarean section for breech presentation in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86:240–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yariv Yogev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hadar, E., Melamed, N., Tzadikevitch-Geffen, K. et al. Timing and risk factors of maternal complications of cesarean section. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283, 735–741 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1450-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1450-0

Keywords

Navigation