Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maternal and perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy: a seven year experience of a tertiary care center

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the risk factors, prevalance, epidemiological parameters and maternal-perinatal outcome in pregnant women with hypertensive disorder. Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis was undertaken on 255 consecutive cases of hypertensive disorder in pregnancy who were managed at Kocaeli University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology from June 1997 to November 2004. Demographic data involving age, parity, gestational week, clinical and laboratory findings were recorded from the medical files. Additionally delivery route, indications of cesarean section, fetal and maternal complications were determined. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS programme using Kruskal Wallis nonparametric test, ANOVA (Analysis of variance) and chi-square tests. Results: Of 5,155 deliveries in our clinic during the defined period, 438 cases (8.49%) were managed as hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. Medical records of 255 cases could be avaliable. Of 255 cases, 138 patients (54.11%) were found to have severe preeclampsia while 88 cases (34.50%) were diagnosed as mild preeclampsia. Twenty-nine patients (11.37%) were suffering from chronic hypertension. Of 138 severely preeclamptic cases, 28 cases (11%) had eclamptic convulsion and another 28 patients (11%) were demonstrated to have HELLP syndrome. Intrauterine growth restriction, oligohydramnios, placental ablation were the obstetric complications in 75 (29.4%), 49 (19.2%), 19 (7.5%) cases, respectively. Additionally multiple pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus were noted in 5.9% (n:15) and 3.9% (n:10) of the patients. Delivery route was vaginal in 105 patients (41.2%) while 150 patients (58.8%) underwent cesarean section with the most frequent indication to be fetal distress in 69 cases (46%). Cesarean section rate seemed to be the lowest (48.3%) in chronic hypertensive women while the highest (63.8%) in severe preeclamptic patients. Maternal mortality occured in 3 cases (1.2%) and all of those cases were complicated with HELLP syndrome. Intracranial bleeding was the cause of maternal death in one case while the other two cases were lost due to acute renal failure and disseminated intravascular coagulation, respectively. Intrauterine fetal demise was recorded in 24 cases on admission. Ten fetuses died during the intrapartum period. Mean gestational age and birth weight were 28±3.5 and 1000±416 g, respectively in this group. In these ten women, five cases were diagnosed as HELLP syndrome, two were severely preeclamptic and three were eclamptic. Perinatal mortality rate was found to be 144/1,000 births Conclusion: Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy is associated with increased risk of maternal-perinatal adverse outcome. The complications of severe preeclampsia and eclampsia could be prevented by more widespread use of prenatal care, education of primary medical care personnel, prompt diagnosis of high-risk patients and timely referral to tertiary medical centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aali BS, Ghafoorian J, Mohamed-Alizadeh S (2004) Severe preeclampsia and eclampsia in Kerman, Iran: complications and outcomes. Med Sci Monit 10(4):163–167

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Ghamdi Saeed MG, Al-Harbi AS, Khalil A, El-Yahya AR (1999) Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: prevalance, classification and adverse outcomes in northwestern Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med J 6:557–560

    Google Scholar 

  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2002) Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin no: 33. Int J Gynecol Obstet 77:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chames MC, Livingston JC, Ivester TS, Barton JR, Sibai BM (2002) Late postpartum eclampsia: a preventable disease? Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1174–1177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coppage KH, Polzin WJ (2002) Severe preeclampsia and delivery outcomes: is immediate cesarean delivery beneficial? Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:921–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Diejomaoh FME, Omu AE, Al-Busiri N, Taher S, Al-Othman S, Fatinikun T, Fernandes S (2004) Nitric oxide production is not altered in preeclampsia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 269:237–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Duley L (2003) Pre-eclampsia and the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Br Med Bull 67:161–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Foy R, Ramsay CR, Grimshaw JM, Penney GC, Vale L, Thomson A, Greer IA (2004) The impact of guidelines on mild hypertension in pregnancy: time series analysis. BJOG 111:765–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaio DS, Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Nucci LB, Matos MC, Branchtein L (2001) Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: frequency, and associate factors in a cohort of Brazilian women. Hypertens Pregnancy 20:269–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Geary M (1997) The HELLP syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynecol 104(8):887–891

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gofton EN, Capewell V, Natale R, Gratton RJ (2001) Obstetrical intervention rates and maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with gestational hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:798–803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanisch CG, Pfeiffer KA, Harald Schlebusch H, Schmolling J (2004) Adhesion molecules, activin and inhibin- candidates for the biochemical prediction of hypertensive diseases in pregnancy? Arch Gynecol Obstet 270:110–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hernandez R, Lopez JL (2001) Preeclampsia and eclampsia: experience at the Cento Medic Nacional de Terreon. Ginecol Obstet Mex 69:341–345

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Isler CM, Rinehart BK, Terrone DA, Martin PW; Magann EF, Martin JN (2000) Maternal mortality associated with HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(2):444–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Katz VL, Farmer R, Kuller JA (2000) Preeclampsia into eclampsia: toward a new paradigm. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1389–1396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kullberg G, Lindeberg S, Hanson U (2002) Eclampsia in Sweden. Hypertens Pregnancy 21(1):13–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuschel B, Zimmermann A, Schneider KTM, Fischer T (2004) Prolongation of pregnancy following eclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 113:245–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee W, O’Connell CM, Basket TF (2004) Maternal and perinatal outcomes of eclampsia: Nova Scotia, 1981–2000. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 26(2):119–123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Livingston CJ, Sibai BM (2001) Chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 28:447–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Matthys LA, Coppage KH, Lambers DS, Barton JR, Sibai BM (2004) Delayed postpartum preeclampsia: an experience of 151 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1464–1466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McCowan LM, Buist RG, North RA, Gamble G (1996) Perinatal morbidity in chronic hypertension. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103:123–129

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group (2000) Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on high blood pressure in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:S1–S22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nisell H, Palm K, Wolff K (2000) Prediction of maternal and fetal complications in preeclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:19–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sawhney H, Aggarwal N, Biswas R (2000) Maternal mortality associated with eclampsia and preeclampsia of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Res 26(5):351–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Serdar S, Gür E, Çolakoğulları M, Develioğlu O, Sarandöl E (2003) Lipid and protein oxidation and antioxidant function in women with mild and severe preeclampsia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 268:19–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sibai BM (1996) Hypertension in pregnancy. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL (eds) Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingston, New York, pp 935–996

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tranquilli AL, Giannibulo SR (2004) The weight of fetal growth restriction in 437 hypertensive pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 270:214–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Cortin SG, Mathews TJ, Park MM (2000) Births: final data for 1998 national vital statistics. Reports 48 (No.3)

  29. Vigil-De Gracia P, Montufar-Rueda C, Ruiz J (2003) Expectant management of severe preeclampsia and preeclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension between 24 and 34 weeks’ gestation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 107:24–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Walker JJ (2000) Preeclampsia. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 14(1):57–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiong X, FraserWD (2004) Impact of pregnancy-induced hypertension on birth weight by gestational age. Ped Perinatal Epidemiol 18:186–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zarean Z (2004) Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 87:194–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gülseren Yücesoy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yücesoy, G., Özkan, S., Bodur, H. et al. Maternal and perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy: a seven year experience of a tertiary care center. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273, 43–49 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0741-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0741-3

Keywords

Navigation