Skip to main content
Log in

Family planning influences and perceptions among dermatology residents from ACGME-accredited training programs: a survey-based study

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an increasing number of women pursue careers in dermatology, the structure and culture of training must reflect the evolving needs of dermatology residents. To examine perceived barriers to and perceptions of family planning amongst dermatology residents capable of becoming pregnant, evidence-based principles were employed to develop a 40-question survey for dermatology residents in ACGME-accredited training programs. A pilot study was conducted with the Harvard Combined Dermatology Residency Training Program residents before full-scale national electronic survey distribution from April to June 2023. Information was collected regarding factors influencing attitudes towards becoming pregnant during residency, as well as information regarding residency program family leave, fertility preservation, and lactation policies. Ultimately, 95 dermatology residents capable of becoming pregnant completed the survey. The majority (77.9%) of respondents reported intentionally delaying having children because of their careers, and 73.7% believed there is a negative stigma attached to being pregnant or having children during dermatology residency. Of respondents who had not yet attempted to become pregnant, 75.3% were concerned about the possibility of future infertility. Of the 60% of respondents considering fertility preservation options, 84.6% noted concerns about these procedures being cost-prohibitive on a resident salary. Only 2% of respondents reported that cryopreservation was fully covered through their residency benefits, while 20% reported partial coverage. Reported program parental leave policies varied considerably with 54.9%, 25.4%, 1.4%, and 18.3% of residents reporting 4–6 weeks, 7–8 weeks, 9–10 weeks, and 11 + weeks of available leave, respectively. Notably, 53.5% of respondents reported that vacation or sick days must be used for parental leave. Respondents reported lactation policies and on-site childcare at 49.5% and 8.4% of residency programs, respectively. The trends noted in the survey responses signal concerning aspects of family planning and fertility for dermatology residents capable of becoming pregnant. Residency family planning policies, benefits, and resources should evolve and homogenize across programs to fully support trainees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Adesoye T, Mangurian C, Choo EK et al (2017) Perceived discrimination experienced by Physician Mothers and Desired Workplace changes: a cross-sectional survey. JAMA Intern Med 177(7):1033–1036. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1394

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Anspach Will E, Maslow BS, Kaye L, Nulsen J (2017) Increasing awareness of age-related fertility and elective fertility preservation among medical students and house staff: a pre- and post-intervention analysis. Fertil Steril 107(5):1200–1205e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashrafzadeh S, Peters GA, Buzney EA, Lee H, Asgari MM (2021) Gender differences in dermatologist practice locations in the United States: a cross-sectional analysis of current gender gaps. Int J Women’s Dermatology 7(4):435–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2021.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Association of American Medical Colleges Matriculating Student Questionnaire 2022 All Schools Summary Report. Published online December 2022. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/report/matriculating-student-questionnaire-msq

  5. Bae G, Qiu M, Reese E, Nambudiri V, Huang S (2016) Changes in sex and ethnic diversity in Dermatology residents over multiple decades. JAMA Dermatol 152(1):92. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.4441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Costello CM, Harvey JA, Besch-Stokes JG et al (2022) The role research gap years play in a successful dermatology match. Int J Dermatology 61(2):226–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.15964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Effective July 2021: New Family Leave Policy. Accessed July 8 (2023) https://www.abderm.org/public/announcements/effective-july-2021-new-family-leave-policy

  8. Gracey LE, Cronin M, Shinkai K, Mathes EF (2018) Program Director and Resident perspectives on new parent leave in Dermatology Residency. JAMA Dermatol 154(10):1222. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2878

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Halley MC, Rustagi AS, Torres JS et al (2018) Physician mothers’ experience of workplace discrimination: a qualitative analysis. BMJ 363:k4926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4926

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawwass JF, Penzias AS, Adashi EY (2021) Fertility—a human right worthy of mandated insurance coverage: the evolution, limitations, and future of access to care. Fertil Steril 115(1):29–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kenyon LE, Malik R, Rodriguez D, Carmel ME (2021) Urology Program directors’ perception of pregnancy during Residency. Urology 153:75–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. MacVane CZ, Fix ML, Strout TD, Zimmerman KD, Block RB, Hein CL, Congratulations (2017) You’re pregnant! Now about your shifts. : the state of Maternity leave attitudes and culture in EM. West J Emerg Med 18(5):800–810

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mattessich S, Shea K, Whitaker-Worth D (2017) Parenting and female dermatologists’ perceptions of work-life balance. Int J Women’s Dermatology 3(3):127–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.04.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association. Insurance Coverage by State. Accessed July 23 (2023) https://resolve.org/learn/financial-resources-for-family-building/insurance-coverage/insurance-coverage-by-state/

  15. Rickards G, Magee C, Artino AR (2012) You can’t fix by analysis what you’ve spoiled by design: developing Survey instruments and Collecting Validity evidence. J Graduate Med Educ 4(4):407–410. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00239.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Humphrey and Bray developed the study concept and design. Humphrey and Wyant were responsible for acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. Humphrey and Wyant drafted the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine O. Brag.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Humphrey, V.S., Wyant, W.A. & Brag, K.O. Family planning influences and perceptions among dermatology residents from ACGME-accredited training programs: a survey-based study. Arch Dermatol Res 316, 159 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-024-02882-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-024-02882-9

Navigation