Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Postoperative recreational sports and subjective shoulder function: a comprehensive analysis following intramedullary stabilization of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction Sports-related outcomes and the role of recreational sports activities for shoulder function after intramedullary stabilization (IMS) of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures (DMCFs) in the general population are not well known. In this study, we aimed to determine the sport-related outcomes (return-to-sports [RTS] rate, type of sports, time until RTS, and intensity) and to explore the role of sports after IMS of DMCFs. Materials and Methods This single-center, retrospective, cohort study included patients who underwent IMS of DMCFs between 2009 and 2022 at a Level II trauma center in Germany, experienced no major complications, and had completed at least 1 year of follow-up. Propensity score matching was conducted to obtain a balanced sample of patients who did not engage (cases) and engaged (controls) in postoperative sports activities by adjusting for age and fracture complexity. Groups were compared to assess the impact of regular sports activities on subjective shoulder functioning at follow-up, as evaluated using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) questionnaires, after controlling for the patient- (i.e., sex and smoking) and treatment- (i.e., surgery duration and physical therapy) factors. Results Among the 199 patients included, the RTS rate was 97.5%, and 160 patients practiced regular postoperative activity, mostly in the same sport and intensity. In the matched cohort (39 cases and 39 controls), practicing regular sports activities postoperatively was the only independent factor associated with a higher OSS in the multiple regression analysis (unstandardized regression coefficient = 2.40; Bias-corrected and accelerated 95% confidence interval [0.28, 4.69]). Conclusions The sport-related outcomes after IMS of DMCFs in our cohort were comparable to those achieved after plate osteosynthesis, and IMS reported in the literature. Recreational sports activities benefitted subjective shoulder function, thereby encouraging further research and potentially influencing management policies. Level of evidence Grade IV – a retrospective observational cohort study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available upon request.

References

  1. Zhao JX, Zhao YP, Mao Z, Yin PB, Hao M, Lyu HC, et al. (2023) Intramedullary nailing versus plating fixation for the treatment of midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 54(Suppl 2):S70–s77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.02.026

  2. Langenhan R, Trifunovic-Koenig M, Probst A, Kilper A, Bushuven S, Schütz L, et al. (2023) Factors affecting duration of inability to work after intramedullary stabilization of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103643

  3. Jubel A, Andemahr J, Bergmann H, Prokop A, Rehm KE (2003) Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of midclavicular fractures in athletes. Br J Sports Med 37:480–483 discussion 484. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.6.480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Grassi FA, Tajana MS, D’Angelo F (2001) Management of midclavicular fractures: comparison between nonoperative treatment and open intramedullary fixation in 80 patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 50:1096–1100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meier C, Grueninger P, Platz A (2006) Elastic stable intramedullary nailing for midclavicular fractures in athletes: indications, technical pitfalls and early results. Acta Orthop Belg 72:269–275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morgan RJ, Bankston LS Jr., Hoenig MP, Connor PM (2010) Evolving management of middle-third clavicle fractures in the National Football League. Am J Sports Med 38:2092–2096. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510372795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Witzel K (2007) [Intramedullary osteosynthesis in fractures of the mid-third of the clavicle in sports traumatology].Z Orthop Unfall. 145:639–642. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-965616

  8. Ode GE, Larson TB, Connor PM, Fleischli JE, D’Alessandro DF (2020) Intramedullary fixation for Displaced Clavicle fractures in the Adolescent Athlete. J Surg Orthop Adv 29:81–87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liaghat B, Pedersen JR, Husted RS, Pedersen LL, Thorborg K, Juhl CB (2023) Diagnosis, prevention and treatment of common shoulder injuries in sport: grading the evidence – a statement paper commissioned by the Danish Society of Sports Physical Therapy (DSSF). Br J Sports Med 57:408–416. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-105674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Langenhan R, Bushuven S, Reimers N, Probst A (2021) S-shaped titanium endomedullary nail reduces telescoping of comminuted midshaft clavicular fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31:391–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Altay S, Koçak Z (2021) Multiple publications from the same dataset: is it Acceptable?Balkan. Med J 38:263–264. https://doi.org/10.5152/balkanmedj.2021.21008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daabiss M (2011) American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status classification. Indian J Anaesth 55:111–115. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.79879

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF (2018) Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2018. J Orthop Trauma 32:S1–S10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Laarhoven J, Hietbrink F, Ferree S, Gunning A, Houwert R, Verleisdonk E, et al. (2019) Associated thoracic injury in patients with a clavicle fracture: a retrospective analysis of 1461 polytrauma patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 45:59–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0673-6.pdf

  15. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. (UECG) Am J Ind Med 29:602–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::Aid-ajim4>3.0.Co;2-l. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group

  16. Dawson J, Rogers K, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A (2009) The Oxford shoulder score revisited.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 129:119–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0549-7

  17. Allain J, Goutallier D, Glorion C (1998) Long-term results of the Latarjet procedure for the treatment of anterior instability of the shoulder.J Bone Joint Surg am. 80:841–852. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199806000-00008

  18. Xu S, Chen JY, Lie HME, Hao Y, Lie DTT (2020) Minimal clinically important difference of Oxford, constant, and UCLA shoulder score for arthroscopic. Rotator cuff Repair J Orthop 19:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2019.11.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nyring MRK, Olsen BS, Amundsen A, Rasmussen JV (2021) Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder Index (WOOS) and the Oxford Shoulder score (OSS).Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 12:299–306. https://doi.org/10.2147/prom.S316920

  20. Zhou A, Xu S, Yew KSA, Lie DTT (2023) Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Oxford, constant, and University of California Los Angeles shoulder scores after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty to allow interpretation of patient-reported outcome measures and future statistical power analyses. 39:1405–1414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.12.027

  21. Liu P, Afzal I, Asopa V, Clement ND, Patel V Changes and thresholds in the Oxford Shoulder score following shoulder arthroplasty: minimal clinically important difference, minimal important and detectable changes, and patient-acceptable symptom state. Shoulder Elb 0: 17585732231176423, https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732231176423

  22. Cohen J (2013) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic

  23. Robertson GAJ, Wood AM (2016) Return to sport following clavicle fractures: a systematic review. Br Med Bull 119:111–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldw029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Souza NASM, d., Belangero PS, Figueiredo EAd, Pochini AdC, Andreoli CV, Ejnisman B (2018) Displaced midshaft clavicle fracture in athletes – should we operate?Revista Brasileira De Ortopedia. (English Edition) 53:171–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2018.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Govindasamy R, Kasirajan S, Meleppuram JJ, Thonikadavath F (2017) A retrospective study of titanium elastic stable intramedullary nailing in displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Rev Bras Ortop 52:270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoogervorst P, van Dam T, Verdonschot N, Hannink G (2020) Functional outcomes and complications of intramedullary fixation devices for midshaft clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 21:395. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03256-8

  27. Ju W, Mohamed SO, Qi B (2020) Comparison of plate fixation vs. intramedullary fixation for the management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Exp Ther Med 20:2783–2793. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Stuart BL, Grebel LE, Butler CC, Hood K, Verheij TJM, Little P (2017) Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 67:e643–e649. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp17X692153

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Chiao C (2005) Effects of recreational physical activity and back exercises on low back pain and psychological distress: findings from the UCLA Low Back Pain Study. Am J Public Health 95:1817–1824. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2004.052993

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ricks M, Borbas P, Perret M, Warby S, Hoy G (2019) When is early return too early? Clavicle plate fixation in Australian rules football athletes: a retrospective review of cases.F1000Research. 8:1615. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.19821.1

  31. Meisterling SW, Cain EL, Fleisig GS, Hartzell JL, Dugas JR (2013) Return to athletic activity after plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Am J Sports Med 41:2632–2636. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513501494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McKee RC, Whelan DB, Schemitsch EH, McKee MD (2012) Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.JBJS. 94:675–684

  33. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (2007) Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg 89(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00020

  34. Frigg A, Rillmann P, Perren T, Gerber M, Ryf C (2009) Intramedullary nailing of clavicular midshaft fractures with the titanium elastic nail: problems and complications. Am J Sports Med 37:352–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508328103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kirkley A, Alvarez C, Griffin S (2003) The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for disorders of the rotator cuff: the western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index. Clin J Sport Med 13:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042752-200303000-00004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing and Paul Schatz for the support in reviewing the manuscript. This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Funding

The authors have no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study´s conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Ronny Langenhan and Milena Trifunovic-Koenig. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Ronny Langenhan and Milena Trifunovic-Koenig, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronny Langenhan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the competent Ethics Committee (Landesärztekammer BW; approval number F-2021-048) and was conducted in accordance with the principles set forth in the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and national regulations.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. Data were processed under German national terms and regulations.

Declaration of generative AI and AI assisted technologies

All authors declare no use or assistance of artificial intelligence in conducting the study or writing this manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Langenhan, R., Probst, A., Bushuven, S. et al. Postoperative recreational sports and subjective shoulder function: a comprehensive analysis following intramedullary stabilization of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05319-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05319-0

Keywords

Navigation