Skip to main content
Log in

Parameters influencing complaints and joint function in patients with osteochondral lesions of the ankle—an investigation based on data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU)

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 19 July 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with osteochondral lesions of the ankle represent a heterogeneous population with traumatic, posttraumatic and idiopathic forms of this pathology, where the etiology of the idiopathic form is principally unknown. The aim of this study was to classify the heterogeneous patient population according to the patients’ complaints and joint function. Data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) was analyzed for this purpose to investigate whether traumatic and posttraumatic lesions cause more complaints and loss of joint function than idiopathic lesions. Moreover, it was sought to determine if lesion localization, defective area, stage, patient age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) are related to patients’ complaints and loss of joint function.

Materials and methods

A 117 patients with osteochondral lesions of the ankle were operated in 20 clinical centers in the period between October 2014 and January 2016. Data collection was performed by means of a web-based Remote Data Entry system at the time of surgery. Patients’ complaints and joint function were assessed with online questionnaires using the German versions of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), followed by statistical data evaluation.

Results

No significant difference was indicated between the groups with traumatic/posttraumatic lesions and idiopathic lesions with regard to most of the patients’ complaints and joint function, excluding the category Life quality of the FAOS score, where patients with idiopathic lesions had a significantly better quality of life (p = 0.02). No significant association was detected between lesion localization, defective area, patient age, gender, and BMI on the one hand, and patients’ complaints and joint function on the other. Similarly, no significant association was found between lesion stage according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification and patients’ complaints and joint function. However, a higher lesion stage according to the classification of Berndt and Harty, modified by Loomer, was significantly associated with more complaints and loss of joint function in some categories of the FAAM and FAOS scores (p ≤ 0.04).

Conclusions

Etiology of the lesion, lesion localization, defective area, lesion stage according to the ICRS classification, patient age, gender, and BMI do not seem to be of considerable relevance for prediction of patients’ complaints and loss of joint function in osteochondral lesions of the ankle. Using the classification of Berndt and Harty, modified by Loomer, seems to be more conclusive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 19 July 2018

    The original version of this article contained an error.

References

  1. Berndt AL, Harty M (1959) Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41-a:988–1020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hintermann B, Regazzoni P, Lampert C, Stutz G, Gachter A (2000) Arthroscopic findings in acute fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82(3):345–351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Laffenetre O (2010) Osteochondral lesions of the talus: current concept. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96(5):554–566. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2010.06.001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Loughlin PF, Heyworth BE, Kennedy JG (2010) Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of osteochondral lesions of the ankle. Am J Sports Med 38(2):392–404. doi:10.1177/0363546509336336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Talusan PG, Milewski MD, Toy JO, Wall EJ (2014) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: diagnosis and treatment in athletes. Clin Sports Med 33(2):267–284. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2014.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson DV, Lyne ED (1984) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: case report on two family members. J Pediatr Orthop 4(3):356–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammett RB, Saxby TS (2010) Osteochondral lesion of the talus in homozygous twins–the question of heredity. Foot Ankle Surg 16(3):e55–e56. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2010.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Woods K, Harris I (1995) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus in identical twins. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77(2):331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. DiGiovanni BF, Fraga CJ, Cohen BE, Shereff MJ (2000) Associated injuries found in chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int 21(10):809–815

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Valderrabano V, Wiewiorski M, Frigg A, Hintermann B, Leumann A (2007) [Chronic ankle instability]. Unfallchirurg 110 (8):691–699; quiz 700. doi:10.1007/s00113-007-1310-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Niemeyer P, Feucht MJ, Fritz J, Albrecht D, Spahn G, Angele P (2016) Cartilage repair surgery for full-thickness defects of the knee in Germany: indications and epidemiological data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(7):891–897. doi:10.1007/s00402-016-2453-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Niemeyer P, Schweigler K, Grotejohann B, Maurer J, Angele P, Aurich M, Becher C, Fay J, Feil R, Fickert S, Fritz J, Hoburg A, Kreuz P, Kolombe T, Laskowski J, Lutzner J, Marlovits S, Muller PE, Niethammer T, Pietschmann M, Ruhnau K, Spahn G, Tischer T, Zinser W, Albrecht D (2015) The German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) for evaluation of surgical treatment for cartilage defects: experience after six months including first demographic data. Z Orthop Unfall 153(1):67–74. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1383222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Spahn G, Fritz J, Albrecht D, Hofmann GO, Niemeyer P (2016) Characteristics and associated factors of Knee cartilage lesions: preliminary baseline-data of more than 1000 patients from the German cartilage registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(6):805–810. doi:10.1007/s00402-016-2432-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Loomer R, Fisher C, Lloyd-Smith R, Sisler J, Cooney T (1993) Osteochondral lesions of the talus. Am J Sports Med 21(1):13–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nauck T, Lohrer H (2011) Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the foot and ankle ability measure for patients with chronic ankle instability. Br J Sports Med 45(10):785–790. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.067637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van Bergen CJ, Sierevelt IN, Hoogervorst P, Waizy H, van Dijk CN, Becher C (2014) Translation and validation of the German version of the foot and ankle outcome score. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(7):897–901. doi:10.1007/s00402-014-1994-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zengerink M, Struijs PA, Tol JL, van Dijk CN (2010) Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(2):238–246. doi:10.1007/s00167-009-0942-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Elias I, Zoga AC, Morrison WB, Besser MP, Schweitzer ME, Raikin SM (2007) Osteochondral lesions of the talus: localization and morphologic data from 424 patients using a novel anatomical grid scheme. Foot Ankle Int 28(2):154–161. doi:10.3113/fai.2007.0154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hembree WC, Wittstein JR, Vinson EN, Queen RM, Larose CR, Singh K, Easley ME (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging features of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Int 33(7):591–597. doi:10.3113/fai.2012.0001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Savage-Elliott I, Ross KA, Smyth NA, Murawski CD, Kennedy JG (2014) Osteochondral lesions of the talus: a current concepts review and evidence-based treatment paradigm. Foot Ankle Spec 7(5):414–422. doi:10.1177/1938640014543362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) is initiated by the Working Group Clinical Tissue Regeneration and supported by the Deutsche Arthrose-Hilfe e.V. and the Stiftung Oskar-Helene-Heim.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Körner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

For this study data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU) was used, which is financially supported by the Deutsche Arthrose-Hilfe e.V. and the Stiftung Oskar-Helene-Heim.

Ethical approval

The local ethic committees at all participating clinical centers gave their approval.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Körner, D., Gueorguiev, B., Niemeyer, P. et al. Parameters influencing complaints and joint function in patients with osteochondral lesions of the ankle—an investigation based on data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137, 367–373 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2638-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2638-6

Keyword

Navigation