Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Two-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections: What is the value of cultures and white cell count in synovial fluid and CRP in serum before second stage reimplantation?

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Besides CRP in serum, white cell counts and cultures of synovial fluid are routinely used to detect periprosthetic joint infections. But the sensitivities of these parameters do vary from 12 to 100 %. In two stage revision arthroplasty before the second stage surgeons have to decide if reimplantation is justified. Therefore, we investigated the value of cultures and white cell count from the synovial fluid with a polymethyl methacrylate spacer in place and CRP in serum before reimplantation to detect persistent infection in a standardized setting.

Methods

115 patients with a two-stage revision hip or knee arthroplasty were included in this study. All patients had an antibiotic loaded polymethylmethacrylate spacer. Retrospectively synovial cultures, white blood count in synovial fluid and CRP in serum were assessed before reimplantation.

Results

The sensitivity of the synovial cultures was 5 % (95 % CI 0.13–24.87), with a specificity of 99 % (95 % CI 94.27–99.97). For white blood count in synovial fluid the sensitivity was 31.3 %, specificity was 39.1 %. Sensitivity for CRP in serum was 42.10 %, specificity was 84.21 %.

Conclusion

Cultures from synovial fluid and white blood count in synovial fluid and CRP seem to be uncertain parameters to exclude persistent infection. We do not recommend joint aspiration before reimplantation anymore. Further research is necessary to find other markers to confirm or exclude persistent infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Annual Report 2013

  2. Herberts P (2000) Malchau, Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 71(2):111–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meermans G, Haddad FS (2010) Is there a role for tissue biopsy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(5):1410–1417

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. McArthur BA, Abdel MP, Taunton MJ, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD (2015) Seronegative infections in hip and knee arthroplasty: periprosthetic infections with normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level. Bone Joint J 97-B(7):939–944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schäfer P, Fink B, Sandow D, Margull A, Berger I, Frommelt L (2008) Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy. Clin Infect Dis 47(11):1403–1409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frommelt L (2009) Diagnosis and treatment of foreign-body-associated infection in orthopaedic surgery. Orthopade 38(9):806–811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anagnostakos K, Jung J, Schmid NV, Schmitt E, Kelm J (2009) Mechanical complications and reconstruction strategies at the site of hip spacer implantation. Int J Med Sci 6(5):274–279

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bertazzoni Minelli E, Benini A, Magnan B, Bartolozzi P (2004) Release of gentamicin and vancomycin from temporary human hip spacers in two-stage revision of infected arthroplasty. J Antimicrob Chemother 53(2):329–334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Webb JC, Gbejuade H, Lovering A, Spencer R (2013) Characterisation of in vivo release of gentamicin from polymethyl methacrylate cement using a novel method. Int Orthop 37(10):2031–2036

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mortazavi SM, Vegari D, Ho A, Zmistowski B, Parvizi J (2011) Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: predictors of failure. Clin Orthop Rel Res 469(11):3049–3054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garvin KL, Evans BG, Salvati EA, Brause BD (1994) Palacos gentamicin for the treatment of deep periprosthetic hip infections. Clin Orthop Rel Res 298:97–105

    Google Scholar 

  12. Masri BA, Panagiotopoulos KP, Greidanus NV, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP (2007) Cementless two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infection after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(1):72–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Romano CL, Gala L, Logoluso N, Romano D, Drago L (2012) Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(12):2445–2453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pelt CE, Grijalva R, Anderson L, Anderson MB, Erickson J, Peters CL (2014) Two-stage revision TKA is associated with high complication and failure rates. Adv Orthop (Epub 2014 Dec 24)

  15. Stammers J, Kahane S, Ranawat V, Miles J, Pollock R, Carrington RW, Briggs T, Skinner JA (2015) Outcomes of infected revision knee arthroplasty managed by two-stage revision in a tertiary referral centre. Knee 22(1):56–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ibrahim MS, Raja S, Khan MA, Haddad FS (2014) A multidisciplinary team approach to two-stage revision for the infected hip replacement: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Bone Joint J 96-B(10):1312–1318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Kim DJ (2015) The outcome of infected total knee arthroplasty: culture-positive versus culture-negative. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(10):1459–1467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF (2013) Proceedings of the International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Bone Joint J 95-B(11):1450–1452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Virolainen P, Lahteenmaki H, Hiltunen A, Sipola E, Meurman O, Nelimarkka O (2002) The reliability of diagnosis of infection during revision arthroplasties. Scand J Surg 91(2):178–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmerli W, Moser C (2012) Pathogenesis and treatment concepts of orthopaedic biofilm infections. EMS Immunol Med Microbiol 65(2):158–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kusuma SK, Ward J, Jacofsky M, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ (2011) What is the role of serological testing between stages of two-stage reconstruction of the infected prosthetic knee? Clin Orthop Rel Res 469(4):1002–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mont MA, Waldman BJ, Hungerford DS (2000) Evaluation of preoperative cultures before second-stage reimplantation of a total knee prosthesis complicated by infection. A comparison-group study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A(11):1552–1557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghanem E, Azzam K, Seeley M, Joshi A, Parvizi J (2009) Staged revision for knee arthroplasty infection: what is the role of serologic tests before reimplantation? Clin Orthop Rel Res 467(7):1699–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schäfer P, Frommelt L (2008) The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(7):874–878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Janz V, Bartek B, Wassilew GI, Stuhlert M, Perka CF, Winkler T (2015) Validation of synovial aspiration in girdlestone hips for detection of infection persistence in patients undergoing 2-stage revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty (Epub 2015 Sept 8)

  26. Zhang AL, Feeley BT, Schwartz BS, Chung TT, Ma CB (2015) Management of deep postoperative shoulder infections: is there a role for open biopsy during staged treatment? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24(1):e15–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoell S, Borgers L, Gosheger G, Dieckmann R, Schulz D, Gerss J, Hardes J (2015) Interleukin-6 in two-stage revision arthroplasty: what is the threshold value to exclude persistent infection before re-implanatation? Bone Joint J 97-B(1):71–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Janz V, Wassilew GI, Hasart O, Matziolis G, Tohtz S, Perka C (2013) Evaluation of sonicate fluid cultures in comparison to histological analysis of the periprosthetic membrane for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection. Int Orthop 37(5):931–936 (Epub 2013 Mar 24)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Janz V, Wassilew GI, Kribus M, Trampuz A, Perka C (2015) Improved identification of polymicrobial infection in total knee arthroplasty through sonicate fluid cultures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135(10):1453–1457 (Epub 2015 Sep 8)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nelson CL, Jones RB, Wingert NC, Foltzer M, Bowen TR (2014) Sonication of antibiotic spacers predicts failure during two-stage revision for prosthetic knee and hip infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(7):2208–2214

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cabo J, Euba G, Saborida A, Gonzalez-Panisello M, Dominguez MA, Agullo JL et al (2011) Clinical outcome and microbiological findings using antibiotic-loaded spacers in two stage revision of periprosthetic joint infections. J Infect 63(1):23–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center of Arthroplasty and Revision Arthroplasty, Department of General Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, University Hospital Muenster, Albert Schweitzer Campus 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany

    Steffen Hoell, Andrea Moeller, Georg Gosheger, Jendrik Hardes, Ralf Dieckmann & Dino Schulz

Authors
  1. Steffen Hoell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Moeller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Georg Gosheger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jendrik Hardes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ralf Dieckmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dino Schulz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Hoell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoell, S., Moeller, A., Gosheger, G. et al. Two-stage revision arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infections: What is the value of cultures and white cell count in synovial fluid and CRP in serum before second stage reimplantation?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 447–452 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2404-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2404-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation