Skip to main content
Log in

Katheterablation von isthmusabhängigem Vorhofflattern

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Vorhofflattern ist eine der häufigsten supraventrikulären Rhythmusstörungen und tritt mit einer Inzidenz von 88/100.000 auf. Es besteht ein ähnlich hohes Thrombembolierisiko wie bei Vorhofflimmern und zusätzlich das Risiko einer 1:1 Überleitung auf die Ventrikel. Da die medikamentöse Dauertherapie keinen signifikanten Erfolg bringt, stellt die kathetergesteuerte Ablation von isthmusabhängigem Vorhofflattern eine Wirksame Alternative dar. Seit der Erstbeschreibung einer Radiofrequenzablation bis heute, konnte das Verfahren soweit verbessert werden, dass eine Erfolgsrate von 90-96% bei einer Rezidivrate von 2-6% erreicht wird. Die Komplikationen, wie ein AV-Block oder ein Perikarderguss, sind mit 2% relativ selten. Moderne Ablationstechniken wie z.B. das Kryoverfahren zeigen ähnliche Erfolgszahlen und stellen in Zukunft eine Alternative zur Radiofrequenzbehandlung dar.

Abstract

Atrial flutter is one of the most common supraventricular arrhythmic diseases and occurs with an incidence of 88/100,000. The high risk for thrombembolic events is similar to that for atrial fibrillation and also has the risk for fast conduction to the ventricle. Pharmacological treatment is not significantly effective. Catheter ablation of common atrial flutter offers an alternative with a high quality outcome ranging from 90-96% and a low recurrence rate of 2-6%. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the cavotricuspidal isthmus is an established treatment for common atrial flutter. Modern techniques like cryo-ablation show nearly the same results and will be an alternative to the RF ablation in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6
Abb. 7
Abb. 8

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Anselme F, Savouré A, Cribier A, Saoudi N (2001) Catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter : a randomized comparsion of 2 methods for determining complete bidirectional isthmus block. Circulation 102:1434–1439

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anselme F, Saoudi N, Poty H, Douillet R, Cribier A (1999) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter. Circ 99:534–540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borggrefe M, Budde T, Podczeck A, Breithardt G (1987) High frequency alternating current ablation of an accessory pathway in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 10 (3): 576–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Calkins H, Canby R, Weiss R et al. (2004) Results of catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. Am J Cardiol 94:437–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cauchemez B, Haissaguerre M, Fischer B, Thomas O, Clementy J, Coumel P (1996) Electrophysiological effects of catheter ablation of inferior vena cava tricuspid annulus isthmus in common atrial flutter. Circ 93:284–294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cosio FG, Arribas F, López-Gil M, Palacios J (1996) Atrial flutter mapping and ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 19:841–853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cosio FG, Arribas F, Lopez-Gil M, Gonzalez HD (1996) Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 7:60–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cosio FG (2002) Atrial flutter update. Card Electrophysiol Rev 6 (4): 356–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer B, Haissaguerre M, Garrigues S, Poquet F, Gencel L, Clementy J, Marcus FI (1995) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter in 80 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 26(6):1356–72

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer B, Jaïs P, Shah D, Chouairi S, Haïssaguerre M, Garrigues S, Poquet F, Gencel L, Clémenty J, Marcus FI (1996) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter in 200 patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 7(12):1225–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Granada J, Uribe W, Chyou PH, Maassen K, Vierkant R, Smith PN, Hayes J, Eaker E, Vidaillet H (2000) Incidence and predictors of atrial flutter in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol 36 (7): 2242–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hillock RJ, Melton IC, Crozier IG (2005) Radiofrequency ablation for common atrial flutter using 8-mm tip catheter and up to 150 W. Europace 7:413–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hindricks G (1993) The Multicentre European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS) : Complications of radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmias. Eur Heart Journ 14:1644–1653

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hindricks G, Kottkamp H (2000) Komplikationen und Risiken der Hochfrequenz Katheterablation tachykarder Herzrhythmusstörungen. Z Kardiol 89:186–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee KW, Yang Y, Scheinman MM (2005) Atrial flutter: a review of its history, mechanisms, clinical features and current therapy. Curr Probl Cardiol 30(3): 121–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewalter T, Yang A, Schwab JO, Schumacher B, Schrickel J, Bielik H, Lüderitz B (2003) Hybridtherapie des Vorhofflimmerns-eine neue therapeutische Alternative. DÄ 9:2309–2315

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mannebach H, Hamm C, Horstkotte D (2002) 18. Bericht über die Leistungszahlen der Herzkatheterlabore in der BRD. Ergebnisse einer gemeinsamen Umfrage der Kommission für Klinische Kardiologie und der Arbeitsgruppe Interventionelle Kardiologie und Angiologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie- Herz- und Kreislaufforschung über das Jahr 2001. Z Kardiol 91 (9): 727–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Meissner A, Borchard R, Müller C, Perings C, Trappe HJ (2006) Akutes Koronarsyndrom nach Katheterablation von Vorhofflattern. Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin 43:134–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Melichercik et al. (2002) Hybridtherapie zur Behandlung von Vorhofflimmern. Präsentation z. 68. Jahrestag der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie, Herz- und Kreislaufforschung, Mannheim

  20. Melo SL, Scanavacca MI, Darrieux FC, Hachul DT, Sosa EA (2007) Ablation of typical atrial flutter: a prospective randomized study of cooled-tip versus 8-mm-tip catheters. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 88:273–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Montenero AS, Bruno N, Antonelli A, Mangiameli D, Barbieri L, Andrew P, Zumbo F (2005) Comparison between a 7 french 6 mm tip cryothermal catheter and a 9 french 8 mm tip cryothermal catheter for cryoablation treatment of common atrial flutter. J Intervent Card Electrophys 13:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakagawa H, Lazzara R, Khastgir T et al. (1996) Role of the tricuspid annulus and the eustachian valve/ridge on atrial flutter. Relevance to catheter ablation of the septal isthmusand a new technique for rapid identification of ablation success. Circulation 94:407–424

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Natale A, Newby KH, Pisanó E, Leonelli F, Fanelli R, Potenza D, Beheiry S, Tomassoni G (2000) Prospective randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic therapy versus first-line radiofrequency ablation in patient with atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol 35 (7): 1898–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Neuzner J, Pitschner HF (Hrsg) (2007) Vorhofflimmern Vorhofflattern. 2. Aufl., Steinkopff Verlag Darmstadt 339–362

  25. Niebauer MJ, Chung MK (2001) Management of atrial flutter. Cardiol Rev 9 (5) 253–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Passman RS, Kadish AH, Dibs SR, Engelstein ED, Goldberger JJ (2004) Radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter : a randomized controlled study of two anatomic approaches. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 27:83–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Paydak H, Kall JG, Burke MC, Rubenstein D, Kopp DE, Verdino RJ, Wilber DJ (1998) Atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation of type I atrial flutter: Time to onset, determinants, and clinical course. Circulation 98: 315–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Reithmann C, Hahnefeld A, Fiek M, Ulbrich M, Steinbeck G (2007) Invasive Elektrophysiologie : Komplikationen, Alpträume und deren Management. Herzschr Elektrophys 4:204–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scavée C, Georger F, Jamart J, Mancini I, Collet B, Blommaert D, De Roy L (2003) Is a cooled tip catheter the solution for the ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus ? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 26:328–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Scavée C, Jaïs P, Hsu LF, Sanders P, Hocini M, Weerasooriya R, Macle L, Raybaud F, Clementy J, Haïssaguerre M (2004) Prospective randomized comparison of irrigated-tip and large tip catheter ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-depended atrial flutter. Eur Heart J 25:963–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmieder S, Ndrepepa G, Dong J, Zrenner B, Schreieck J, Schneider MA, Karch MR, Schmitt C (2003) Acute and long-term results of radiofrequency ablation of common atrial flutter and the influence of the right atrial isthmus ablation on the occurence of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 24 (19): 956–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shah DC, Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Takahashi A, Clémenty J (1999) Atrial flutter: contemporary electrophysiology and catheter ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 22:344–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shah DC, Takahashi A, Jaïs P, Hocini M, Clémenty J, Haïssaguerre M (1999) Local electrogram-based criteria of cavotricuspid isthmus block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 10:662–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Steinberg JS, Prasher S, Zelenkofske S, Ehlert FA (1995) Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter : Procedural success and long-term outcome. Am Heart J 130:85–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauerle, H., Japha, T. & Gonska, B.D. Katheterablation von isthmusabhängigem Vorhofflattern. Herzschr. Elektrophys. 19, 60–67 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-008-0001-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-008-0001-x

Navigation