Skip to main content
Log in

Association between ultra-processed food and snacking behavior in Brazil

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
European Journal of Nutrition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Ultra-processed food may play a role in facilitating snacking behavior because of their convenience and low satiety potential. This study aimed to describe the association between consumption of ultra-processed foods and frequency of snacking.

Methods

We analyzed data from 46,164 participants (≥ 10 years old) in the 2017–2018 Brazilian Household Budget Survey. Dietary data were collected by 24-h dietary recalls over one or two days for each participant. We estimated energy intake, ultra-processed food consumption, and level of snacking. We measured the association between ultra-processed food consumption and level of snacking using multinomial logistic regression, stratified by age group (adolescents, 10–19 years old; adults, 20–64 years old; elders, 65 or older).

Results

We found a statistically significant tendency of increased daily energy intake and consumption of snacks and that ultra-processed food consumption was positively associated with the level of snacking for all age groups. For adolescents, adults, and elders in the highest quintile of ultra-processed food consumption as a share of their entire diet, the relative risk ratio (95% CI) of having more than two snacks per day compared to no snacks was 14.21 (9.09–22.21), 4.44 (3.54–5.57), and 4.21 (2.67–6.64), respectively, when compared to the lowest quintile.

Conclusion

Higher consumption of ultra-processed food was associated with snacking behavior, and the strength of this association was stronger among adolescents. Efforts to mitigate ultra-processed food attributes that facilitate snacking should be incorporated into strategies to promote healthier food choices, especially among adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The 2017-2018 Brazilian Household Budget Survey data that support the findings of this study are publicly available from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística) website (“POF - Consumer Expenditure Survey, Microdata”, https://www.ibge.gov.br/en/statistics/social/population/25610-pof-2017-2018-pof-en.html?=&t=microdados).

Abbreviations

UPF:

Ultra-processed foods

References

  1. Duffey KJ, Pereira RA, Popkin BM (2013) Prevalence and energy intake from snacking in Brazil: analysis of the first nationwide individual survey. Eur J Clin Nutr 67:868–874. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Duffey KJ, Rivera JA, Popkin BM (2014) Snacking is prevalent in Mexico. J Nutr 144:1843–1849. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.114.198192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Piernas C, Popkin BM (2010) Snacking increased among U.S. Adults between 1977 and 2006. J Nutr 140:325–332. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.112763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mattes RD (2018) Snacking: a cause for concern. Physiol Behav 193:279–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (2020) Scientific Report of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: Advisory Report to the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC

  6. Duffey KJ, Popkin BM (2011) Energy density, portion size, and eating occasions: contributions to increased energy intake in the United States, 1977–2006. PLoS Med 8:e1001050. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001050

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bes-Rastrollo M, Sanchez-Villegas A, Basterra-Gortari FJ et al (2010) Prospective study of self-reported usual snacking and weight gain in a Mediterranean cohort: The SUN project. Clin Nutr 29:323–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2009.08.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Marmonier C, Chapelot D, Fantino M, Louis-Sylvestre J (2002) Snacks consumed in a nonhungry state have poor satiating efficiency: influence of snack composition on substrate utilization and hunger. Am J Clin Nutr 76:518–528. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/76.3.518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Graaf C (2006) Effects of snacks on energy intake: An evolutionary perspective. Appetite 47:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.02.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levitsky D (2005) The non-regulation of food intake in humans: Hope for reversing the epidemic of obesity. Physiol Behav 86:623–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bellisle F (2014) Meals and snacking, diet quality and energy balance. Physiol Behav 134:38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.03.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Njike VY, Smith TM, Shuval O et al (2016) Snack food, satiety, and weight. Adv Nutr 7:866–878. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.009340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Monteiro CA, Gomes FS, Cannon G (2010) The snack attack. Am J Public Health 100:975–981. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.187666

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Popkin BM, Duffey KJ (2010) Does hunger and satiety drive eating anymore? Increasing eating occasions and decreasing time between eating occasions in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr 91:1342–1347. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.28962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Monteiro CA, Cannon G, Levy RB et al (2019) Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them. Public Health Nutr 22:936–941. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980018003762

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Martini D, Godos J, Bonaccio M et al (2021) Ultra-processed foods and nutritional dietary profile: a meta-analysis of nationally representative samples. Nutrients 13:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Askari M, Heshmati J, Shahinfar H et al (2020) Ultra-processed food and the risk of overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Obes 44:2080–2091. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-020-00650-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Beslay M, Srour B, Méjean C et al (2020) Ultra-processed food intake in association with BMI change and risk of overweight and obesity: a prospective analysis of the French NutriNet-Santé cohort. PLoS Med 17:e1003256. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003256

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rauber F, Chang K, Vamos EP et al (2021) Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of obesity: a prospective cohort study of UK Biobank. Eur J Nutr 60:2169–2180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-020-02367-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Canhada SL, Luft VC, Giatti L et al (2020) Ultra-processed foods, incident overweight and obesity, and longitudinal changes in weight and waist circumference: the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). Public Health Nutr 23:1076–1086. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980019002854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hall KD, Ayuketah A, Brychta R et al (2019) Ultra-processed diets cause excess calorie intake and weight gain: an inpatient randomized controlled trial of ad libitum food intake. Cell Metab 30:67-77.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. da Louzada MLC, Martins APB, Canella DS et al (2015) Ultra-processed foods and the nutritional dietary profile in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 49:38. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049006132

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Steele EM, Raubenheimer D, Simpson SJ et al (2018) Ultra-processed foods, protein leverage and energy intake in the USA. Public Health Nutr 21:114–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017001574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pagliai G, Dinu M, Madarena MP et al (2021) Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr 125:308–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114520002688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Elizabeth L, Machado P, Zinöcker M et al (2020) Ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a narrative review. Nutrients 12:1955. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12071955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Fardet A (2016) Minimally processed foods are more satiating and less hyperglycemic than ultra-processed foods: a preliminary study with 98 ready-to-eat foods. Food Funct 7:2338–2346. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6fo00107f

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fardet A, Méjean C, Labouré H et al (2017) The degree of processing of foods which are most widely consumed by the French elderly population is associated with satiety and glycemic potentials and nutrient profiles. Food Funct 8:651–658. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6FO01495J

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Blundell JE (2017) The contribution of behavioural science to nutrition: appetite control. Nutr Bull 42:236–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brasileiro I, de Geografia e Estatística, (2020) Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares 2017–2018: análise do consumo alimentar pessoal no Brasil. IBGE, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moshfegh AJ, Rhodes DG, Baer DJ et al (2008) The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 88:324–332. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/88.2.324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Universidade de São Paulo, Food Research Center (2020) Tabela Brasileira de Composição de Alimentos (TBCA). In: Versão 7.1. http://www.fcf.usp.br/tbca. Accessed 25 Nov 2020

  32. Rodrigues RM, De Carli E, Araújo MC et al (2021) Limitations in the comparison of the Brazilian National Dietary Surveys of 2008–2009 and 2017–2018. Rev Saude Publica 55:1–10. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stata Corp (2018) Stata. Release 14. College Station, TX.

  34. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2021) POF 2017–2018—Consumer Expenditure Survey Microdata. https://www.ibge.gov.br/en/statistics/social/health/25610-pof-2017-2018-pof-en.html?=&t=microdados. Accessed 14 Nov 2022

  35. Chazelas E, Deschasaux M, Srour B et al (2020) Food additives: distribution and co-occurrence in 126,000 food products of the French market. Sci Rep 10:3980. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60948-w

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zinöcker M, Lindseth I (2018) The Western Diet–microbiome-host interaction and its role in metabolic disease. Nutrients 10:365. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10030365

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Schulte EM, Avena NM, Gearhardt AN (2015) Which foods may be addictive? The roles of processing, fat content, and glycemic load. PLoS ONE 10:e0117959. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0117959

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Small DM, DiFeliceantonio AG (2019) Processed foods and food reward. Science (1979) 363:346–347. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Farley TA, Baker ET, Futrell L, Rice JC (2010) The ubiquity of energy-dense snack foods: a National Multicity Study. Am J Public Health 100:306–311. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.178681

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Machado PP, Claro RM, Canella DS et al (2017) Price and convenience: The influence of supermarkets on consumption of ultra-processed foods and beverages in Brazil. Appetite 116:381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fay SH, White MJ, Finlayson G, King NA (2015) Psychological predictors of opportunistic snacking in the absence of hunger. Eat Behav 18:156–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.05.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Larson N, Story M (2009) A review of environmental influences on food choices. Ann Behav Med 38:56–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9120-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Benelam B (2009) Satiation, satiety and their effects on eating behaviour. Nutr Bull 34:126–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. De Cock N, Van Lippevelde W, Goossens L et al (2016) Sensitivity to reward and adolescents’ unhealthy snacking and drinking behavior: the role of hedonic eating styles and availability. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0341-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Ogden J, Coop N, Cousins C et al (2013) Distraction, the desire to eat and food intake. Towards an expanded model of mindless eating. Appetite 62:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Guimarães JS, Mais LA, Leite FHM et al (2020) Ultra-processed food and beverage advertising on Brazilian television by International Network for Food and Obesity/Non-Communicable Diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support benchmark. Public Health Nutr 23:2657–2662. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980020000518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Harris JL, Yokum S, Fleming-Milici F (2021) Hooked on junk: emerging evidence on how food marketing affects adolescents’ diets and long-term health. Curr Addict Rep 8:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-020-00346-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Boyland EJ, Whalen R (2015) Food advertising to children and its effects on diet: review of recent prevalence and impact data. Pediatr Diabetes 16:331–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fleming-Milici F, Harris JL (2020) Adolescents’ engagement with unhealthy food and beverage brands on social media. Appetite 146:104501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Popkin BM, Barquera S, Corvalan C et al (2021) Towards unified and impactful policies to reduce ultra-processed food consumption and promote healthier eating. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 9:462–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00078-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Taillie LS, Reyes M, Colchero MA et al (2020) An evaluation of Chile’s Law of Food Labeling and Advertising on sugar-sweetened beverage purchases from 2015 to 2017: a before-and-after study. PLoS Med 17:e1003015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003015

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Colchero MA, Rivera-Dommarco J, Popkin BM, Ng SW (2017) In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Health Aff 36:564–571. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Basu S, Madsen K (2017) Effectiveness and equity of sugar-sweetened beverage taxation. PLoS Med 14:e1002327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002327

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Basto-Abreu A, Torres-Alvarez R, Reyes-Sánchez F et al (2020) Predicting obesity reduction after implementing warning labels in Mexico: a modeling study. PLoS Med 17:e1003221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003221

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Schwartz MB, Just DR, Chriqui JF, Ammerman AS (2017) Appetite self-regulation: environmental and policy influences on eating behaviors. Obesity (Silver Spring) 25(Suppl 1):S26–S38. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Chapelot D (2011) The role of snacking in energy balance: a biobehavioral approach. J Nutr 141:158–162. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.109.114330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) – Finance Code 001 (stipend received by M.F.G.-V.). E.M.S. received a post-doctoral stipend, grant 2018/17972-9, from São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP). CAPES and FAPESP had no role in the design, analysis, or writing of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MFG-V, the first author, participated in the design and planning of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, and writing of the manuscript. EMS and GCA participated in the design and planning of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, the critical review of the content, and approval of the final version of the manuscript. MLCL and RBL participated in the design and planning of the study, interpretation of data, the critical review of the content, and approval of the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Fernanda Gombi-Vaca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

This study analyzed secondary survey data that is de-identifiable and publicly available. Therefore, this study did not require review by the Institutional Review Board. Verbally informed consent was obtained from all participants of the 2017–2018 Brazilian Household Budget Survey.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 177 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gombi-Vaca, M.F., Martinez-Steele, E., Andrade, G.C. et al. Association between ultra-processed food and snacking behavior in Brazil. Eur J Nutr (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-024-03340-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-024-03340-y

Keywords

Navigation