Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The association of reduced global longitudinal strain with cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction among patients receiving cancer therapy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cardiotoxicity is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients receiving cancer therapy. The most commonly used definition is cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) defined by a left ventricular ejection fraction reduction. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) has been implied to be superior in detecting early subclinical dysfunction.

Objectives

Evaluate the prevalence of reduced GLS and whether it is associated with CTRCD development among patients receiving cancer therapy.

Methods

Data were collected as part of the Israel Cardio-Oncology Registry (ICOR), a prospective registry enrolling all adult patients receiving different types of cancer therapy, who were referred to the cardio-oncology clinic. Patients were divided into two groups—reduced GLS (> − 17%) vs. preserved GLS (≤ − 17%). Multivariable analyses were adjusted for a propensity score for baseline characteristics.

Results

Among 291 consecutive patients, 48 (16%) patients were included in the reduced GLS group. Overall, 11 (5%) patients developed CTRCD at following echocardiogram evaluation. Patients with preserved GLS had a significantly lower risk for CTRCD development [odds ratio (OR) 0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03–0.41, p = 0.001], with every 1-unit improvement of GLS the risk of CTRCD decreased by 16% (OR 0.84, 95%CI 0.73–0.95, p = 0.007). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, including cardiovascular risk factors and systolic function, preserved GLS remained significantly associated with a lower risk for CTRCD development (OR 0.11, 95%CI 0.02–0.64, p = 0.014), with every 1-unit improvement lowering the risk by 19% (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.67–0.98, p = 0.032).

Conclusions

Reduced GLS is common among patients receiving cancer therapy and may identify patients at increased risk for CTRCD development.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CTRCD:

Cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

GLS:

Global longitudinal strain

STE:

Speckle-tracking echocardiography

ANT:

Anthracyclines

LV:

Left ventricle

SD:

Standard deviation

IQR:

Interquartile ranges

BB:

Beta blocker

ACEI:

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor

ARB:

Angiotensin II receptor blocker

LVEDD:

Left ventricle end diastolic diameter

LVESD:

Left ventricle end systolic diameter

OR:

Odd ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66:7–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tilemann LM, Heckmann MB, Katus HA, Lehmann LH, Müller OJ (2018) Cardio-oncology: conflicting priorities of anticancer treatment and cardiovascular outcome. Clin Res Cardiol 107(4):271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Patnaik JL, Byers T, DiGuiseppi C, Dabelea D, Denberg TD (2011) Cardiovascular disease competes with breast cancer as the leading cause of death for older females diagnosed with breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res 13(3):R64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Muñoz DR, Aboyans V, Asteggiano R, Galderisi M et al (2016) ESC position paper on cancer treatments and cardiovascular toxicity developed under the auspices of the ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Eur Heart J 2016(37):2768–2801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Quiñones MA, Greenberg BH, Kopelen HA, Koilpillai C, Limacher MC, Shindler DM et al (2000) Echocardiographic predictors of clinical outcome in patients with left ventricular dysfunction enrolled in the SOLVD registry and trials: significance of left ventricular hypertrophy: studies of left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1237–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Swain SM, Whaley FS, Ewer MS (2003) Congestive heart failure in patients treated with doxorubicin: a retrospective analysis of three trials. Cancer 91:2869–2879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sawaya H, Seba IA, Plana JC, Januzzi JL, Ky B, Cohen V et al (2011) Early detection and prediction of cardiotoxicity in chemotherapy-treated patients. Am J Cardiol 107:1375–1380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoon HJ, Kim KH, Kim HY, Park H, Cho JY, Hong YJ, Park HW, Kim JH, Ahn Y, Jeong MH, Cho JG, Park JC (2019) Impacts of non-recovery of trastuzumab-induced cardiomyopathy on clinical outcomes in patients with breast cancer. Clin Res Cardiol 10:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01417-x[Epub ahead of print] PMID: 30737527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Santoro C, Aripino G, Esposito R, Lembo M, Paciolla I, Cardalesi C et al (2017) 2D and 3D strain for detection of subclinical anthracycline cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients: a balance with feasibility. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:930–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cardinale D, Colombo A, Lamantia G, Colombo N, Civelli M, DeGiacomi G et al (2010) Anthracycline induced cardiomyopathy: clinical relevance and response to pharmacologic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:213–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wadhwa D, Fallah-Rad N, Grenier D, Krahn M, Fang T, Ahmadie R et al (2008) Trastuzumab mediated cardiotoxicity in the setting of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117:357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Buckert D, Cieslik M, Tibi R, Radermacher M, Rasche V, Bernhardt P, Hombach V, Rottbauer W, Wöhrle J (2018) Longitudinal strain assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance correlates to hemodynamic findings in patients with severe aortic stenosis and predicts positive remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Clin Res Cardiol 107(1):20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sawaya H, Sebag IA, Plana JC, Januzzi JL, Ky B, Tan TC et al (2012) Assessment of echocardiography and biomarkers for the extended prediction of cardiotoxicity in patients treated with anthracyclines, taxanes, and trastuzumab. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5:596–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geyer H, Caracciolo G, Abe H, Wilansky S, Carerj S, Gentile F et al (2010) Assessment of myocardial mechanics using speckle tracking echocardiography: fundamentals and clinical applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:351–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stanton T, Learno R, Marwick TH (2009) Prediction of all-cause mortality from global longitudinal speckle strain comparison with ejection fraction and wall motion scoring. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2(5):356–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sawaya H, Sebag IA, Plana JC, Januzzi JC, Ky B, Tan TC et al (2012) Assessment of echocardiography and biomarkers for the extended prediction of cardiotoxicity in patients treated with anthracyclines, taxanes, and trastuzumab. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 5:596–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Negishi K, Negishi T, Hare JL, Haluksa BA, Plana JC, Marwick TH (2013) Independent and incremental value of deformation indices for prection of trastuzumab induced cardiotoxicity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:493–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dalen J, Thorstensen A, Aase SA, Ingul CB, Topr H, Vatten LJ et al (2010) Segmental and global longitudinal strain and strain rate based on echocardiography of 1266 healthy individuals: the HUNT study in Norway. Eur J Echocardiogr 11(2):176–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Plana JC, Galderisi M, Barac A et al (2014) Expert Consensus for Multimodality Imaging Evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27(9):911–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(1–39):E14

    Google Scholar 

  21. Charbonnel C, Convers-Domart R, Rigaudeau S (2017) Assessment of global longitudinal strain at low-dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy, for the prediction of subsequent cardiotoxicity. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18:392–401

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fujikura K, Peltzer B, Tiwari N, Shim HG, Dinhofer AB, Shitole SG et al (2018) Reduced global longitudinal strain is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events or death after kidney transplant. Int J Cardiol 272:323–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krishnasamy R, Isbel NM, Hawley CM, Pascoe EM, Burrage M, Leano R et al (2015) Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a superior predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality when compared to ejection fraction in advanced chronic kidney disease. PLoS One 10(5):e0127044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Laufer-Perl M, Derakhshesh M, Milwidsky A, Mor L, Ravid D, Amrami N et al (2016) Usefulness of global longitudinal strain for early identification of subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in patients with active cancer. Am J Cardiol 122(10):1784–1789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Negishi K, Negishi T, Haluska BA, Hare JL, Plana JC, Marwick TH (2014) Use of speckle strain to assess left ventricular response to cardiotoxic chemotherapy and cardioprotection. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15(3):324–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gulati G, Heck SL, Ree AH, Hoffmann P, Schulz-Menger J, Fagerland MW et al (2016) Prevention of cardiac dysfunction during adjuvant breast cancer therapy (PRADA): a 2 × 2 factorial, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial of candesartan and metoprolol. Eur Heart J 37(21):1671–1680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bosch X, Rovira M, Sitges M, Domènech A, Ortiz-Pérez JT, de Caralt TM et al (2013) Enalapril and carvedilol for preventing chemotherapy-induced left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with malignant hemopathies: the OVERCOME trial (prevention of left ventricular dysfunction with enalapril and carvedilol in patients submitted to intensive chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant hemopathies). J Am Coll Cardiol 61(23):2355–2362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Thavendiranathan P, Poulin F, Lim KD, Plana JC, Woo A, Marwick TH (2014) Use of myocardial strain imaging for the early detection of cardiotoxic patients during and after cancer chemotherapy: a systematic review. J Am Coll Cardiol 63(25 Pt A):2751–2768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. El-Sherbeny WS, Sabry NM, Sharbay RM (2019) Prediction of trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. J Echocardiogr 17(2):76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rhea IB, Uppuluri S, Sawada S, Schneider BP, Feigenbaum H (2015) Incremental prognostic value of echocardiographic strain and its association with mortality in cancer patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(6):667–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bower JE, Ganz PA, Irwin MR, Castellon S, Arevalo J, Cole SW (2013) Cytokine genetic variations and fatigue among patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 31(13):1656–1661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Laufer-Perl.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laufer-Perl, M., Arnold, J.H., Mor, L. et al. The association of reduced global longitudinal strain with cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction among patients receiving cancer therapy. Clin Res Cardiol 109, 255–262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01508-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01508-9

Keywords

Navigation